I'll make it about the Boxer Rebellion in China, except I'll change it so the kung fu could actually deflect bullets, as was intended.
Kirosilence said:American Civil War FPS.
Although the game play would be pretty slow for a First Person Shooter, being that after every round you would need to preform a precise quick time event to reload your muzzle loader.
Also, there would be aliens, just to fuck shit up.
If Resistance has taught us anything, Historical Wars + Aliens = Win. (Yes I know they aren't ACTUALLY aliens, but they are in some.. weird.. way)0110100110 said:Kirosilence said:American Civil War FPS.
Although the game play would be pretty slow for a First Person Shooter, being that after every round you would need to preform a precise quick time event to reload your muzzle loader.
Also, there would be aliens, just to fuck shit up.
I'd love that.
Especially the fuckin aliens.
I assume the US is gone? Otherwise, I can sort of see it being a barrier between the two countries.super_smash_jesus said:it would be well in the future, and we would be invaded by some type of alien force, where our only hope would be a rough and tumble group of men dripping in testosterone and armored to the teeth. Oh wait....
I would like to see a game involving modern war between Canada and Mexico. Or as modern as mexico allows.
Vimy Ridge might be interesting to play through. I actually thought out a world war 1 shooter in my head earlier, and it turns out it could be fun if made right.Hardcore_gamer said:I would make a good FPS shooter that takes place in World war 1. Unlike what most people think the war was NOT just about trench warfare, and i think game developers could probably make a good war game out if it. Plus there are many epic battles that took place during that war like the battle of Some and Verdun witch claimed something like a million solders from both sides.
similar but more realistic, it would contain both strategy (similar to Total War campaign map) and FPS parts. The player could choose what kind of army he would build and what he will do with it, and (again similar to Total War) when the battles happen, the player would have the choice of participating in it, in a FPS way. For reasons of realism the players deaths and kills would affect the numbers of the armies involved. Oh and he would be able to drive any vehicle that his army posesses. OH and the graphics would be awesome! OH and it wouldn't be too strong on the hardware! Yeah... that would be awesomeDoug said:So...similar to World in Conflict or Freedom Fighters then ?VladBlok28 said:Fictional WWIII during the '70s - the height of the Cold War. No stupid high tech, no stupid sattelites, just plain ol' guns and bombs. And tanks. Lots of tanks.
And OFC there would be campaigns for both sides (but the the Soviets would win at the end![]()
![]()
See my post aboveSparrow Tag said:Luckily enough theres about 4,000 games that fit that exact dateVladBlok28 said:Fictional WWIII during the '70s - the height of the Cold War. No stupid high tech, no stupid sattelites, just plain ol' guns and bombs. And tanks. Lots of tanks.
And OFC there would be campaigns for both sides (but the the Soviets would win at the end![]()