Yeah, okay, whatever. From what has been studied and from what I have seen children universally have problems with conversions of mass and volume (little alone other perceptual problems). You can universally 'wow' any child of 5 years and younger by pouring water from a large, short beaker into a skinny, long beaker.HG131 said:Quick FYI, I hate smoking, and think it should be illegal. Secondly, unless you do warrant-less raids on homes, laws like that would never work. Plus, it takes away the freedom of parents to have their own beliefs. Perhaps it's because I have always had an overdeveloped notion of reality, and could always tell the difference. I was reading books at age 2, and was reading at a high school level by third grade. I've never had to study, and always thought outside the box. Laws and rules are not the way to go, open-mindedness and understanding that the human mind is not as fragile as we believe is.
They'll think it's magic.
All children proceed from a state of egocentrism to sociocentrism. Which is why children act like children. That's not your fault, that's how children are hardwired. I have yet to see a child who didn't. Even your rundown of your merits seems disjointed from reality that children regularly associate with during the pre-operational phase (of which is, ironically, the age group you're talking about as you relate to me your memories).
One theory that a friend surmised in a developmental psych paper she wrote was the idea that maybe the lack of proper memory of Piaget's preoperational phase as adults is due to the fact that the worldviews and egocentrism that accompanies the mentality of that phase is universally misunderstandable in the adult psyche. Damn good paper and theory.
The idea that the reason why our memory falters trying to remember ourselves as children when we are 3 to 7 (beyond times of emotional distress which can resonate into powerful phobias) is because our brains cannot completely comprehend how we viewed the world in a said way, or how we rationalized the world in the way we did.
In short, you have much to learn about life. If Piaget's challengers were right about anything, being a child doesn't really end until one is 20-odd. As many people under the age of 20 still fail in the face of questions of moral integrity and retain levels of egocentrism that should have generally have been accepted as things that should be dropped for the sake of social cohesion.
Such questions as "Your wife is dying of a curable disease but you cannot afford the cure. Do you steal it and accept the consequences of your actions? Explain why you came up with your answer" and the like. The answers to the questions are surprising, even by people who are 18 or 19 who should possibly know better.
Sure the laws may not beable to be enforced, but I think the law should atleast state that it should be mentioned by store clerks to the parents who buy mature games "This product is not meant for use by children under the age of . It contains themes that are not suitable for developing minds.".
I think most parents would second guess their purchase for their children if they were told this. I know I would if confronted by such a direct comment. That being said I wouldn't buy a restricted product for my child to begin with.