
Yeah, unless you are some wildman going without, well, just about everything, then your not really a vegan. But, if you are a wildman, I bet you that your hunting your own food.
Why should we care? Why is it moral not to eat animals? Why should I not be able to eat bacon if I feel like it?Cubilone said:People saying that they do it because it's natural are just giving excuses for a weak moral line. Unless of course they don't care -- that is, I expect, most people.
You can stop there buddy, what exactly did we evolve from, well, common thing is monkies, so therefore were highly advanced monkies, argo were animals. Why should he have problem with eating meat, its like a lion in Africa just takes down a human, do you think that lion there will think twice about eating you and leaving scraps for the hyenas, hell no, he'll just do it.Cadmium Magenta said:Hi forum!
After watching MovieBob's recent Big Picture episode on the PeTA/Super Mario controversy, I'm curious about people's stance on animal rights here. What I found curious is that Bob asserted he supports animal rights, in that he abstains from products like fur and boycotts companies that test on animals. On the other hand though, eating animals does not seem to be problematic for him.
Just to be clear, I'm vegan myself and a very strong believer in animal rights, but I'm not a fan of PeTA and I absolutely agree with Bob's disapproval of their hysterical and sensationalist publicity work. Also, while I feel that being vegan is the most ethical way of living with animals, I do not view myself as being better than meat-eaters, nor do I think that eating meat makes you a bad person. Please don't see my opinion as an affront to your lifestyle and worldview. I don't mean to be hostile. My goal is to make people question some things we have been taught about the animals we eat, without shoving my own morality down their throats.
So let me just very briefly outline why I chose to become vegan:
Human beings are omnivores
Damn, that was a very legit point. Would this rule also apply, that per one head of cabbage you just depraved a mouse family of cabbage?TrilbyWill said:thats actually a good point... and i suppose if we stuck to one species it wouldnt be such a massive impact.Rawne1980 said:I eat meat because I like it.
The first time a steak looks up at me and tells me it doesn't want to be eaten is the time when turn vegan.
As that is never likely to happen, I guess i'll continue with this full english breakfast i'm about to cook.
http://web.archive.org/web/20041107084521/http://eesc.orst.edu/agcomwebfile/news/food/vegan.html
And there you go vegans, millions of animals die to feed you so now your high horse comes tumbling down.
Guess you don't have a moral high ground at all.
Please look at the picture below me.Orinon said:No, but the vegetarians actually care where it came fromEighth 1 said:So what you're saying is, vegetarians are smarter because they 'realize' that steak comes from cows? And what, everyone else just thinks that farmer brown and his cows make it in their magical workshop like santa and his fucking elves? Yeah... No, not buying it.Orinon said:"It is very, very VERY easy to just eat a slab of meat in front of you, and not care. But Vegetarians actually take the time to consider where that steak came from. The basic idea here is this: The vegetarians intelligence didn't just appear because they don't eat meat, It's from the mindset they possessed which made them realize where that steak came from "
most people see the steak and say `yep from a cow, not gonna think any more on it.`
First you say thisCadmium Magenta said:{your ok up until this point}
This means that there is no biological need for us to eat meat. We simply feel like eating it.
Therefore, whenever we kill an animal for food, we are essentially deciding that our appetite is more important than that creature's life. We are inflicting deadly violence on a defenseless being, simply for our own pleasure. Personally, I don't think that's ethical behavior.
Now, many people say that nature isn't ethical, that animals brutally kill and eat other animals all the time. That's true, but we are not animals. We are not lions or sharks. Lions or sharks cannot choose *not* to eat meat because they are natural carnivores and couldn't survive on a herbivorous diet. Humans, on the other hand, can. We are moral beings and as a result of our morality, we place innumerable restrictions on ourselves for the greater good: We prohibit or disapprove of theft, murder, rape, deception, defamation etc.
So why do we think it's okay to deprive an entire species of their liberty and kill them for their flesh?
To sum it up: Just because we *can* eat anything, doesn't necessarily mean that we *should*.
What do you think? I'm very curious to know.
maninahat said:You probably missed the point he made about humans being capable of choosing not to eat meat, a moral choice which appears to beyond most animals. So no, the OP isn't blaming animals for eating meat (they are apparently not capable of knowing any reason why they shouldn't), but he blames us for continuing to eat meat even when (unlike all animals) we have the luxury of choosing not to. We are, as you say, animals. But unlike other animals, we aren't starving and we can easily remove meat from our diets. In fact, our choice to eat meat is often less efficient than vegetarianism, due to the inevitable costs of feeding and maintaining livestock (you need room for corn or pastures ,just to feed the cows - room which could have just been used for crops, without the cow business).Christemo said:yes we are. we are animals, we are just the most advanced species of animals on the planet.Cadmium Magenta said:That's true, but we are not animals.
and on the topic of killing animals, if thats the case, of being omnivores, then why don´t animals like small cats live strictly off of catnip? do you think im going to punish my cat if he comes home with a mouse in his mouth.
it´s survival of the fittest. if the animal kingdom can´t keep up with us, they will have to evolve and adapt. do you think lions would start feeling bad for us if they hunted us and ate us? No.
Animals eat other animals, and thats exactly what we are. there´s no reason we should respect and not eat animals that would do the exact same to us given the chance.
You're doing some hardcore strawmanning that's bordering on self-parody, here. You raise some valid points here and there, but saying things such as eating meat is inherently wrong (eye of the beholder), that animals do it because they don't comprehend morality (instead of, you know, facing death from malnourishment, not to mention the potential destruction herbivores can cause when left unchecked), that meat is an entirely optional part of our diets (it's been proven countless times that we've evolved to eat and rely upon a variety of foods, and cannot get the nutrition meat provides elsewhere naturally, much as we can't get the nutrition some plant matter provides elsewhere naturally) and that vegetarians not only all put cost in mind in their decision to become one, but that it's their sole reasoning is... questionable, at best.maninahat said:No, he's saying that vegetarians take the time to weigh up the costs of getting that steak; they come to the rational decision that it isn't worth the added cost of producing beef, or the slaughter of the animal that produced it. Most people don't take that time to make such considerations. All vegetarians do (otherwise, they wouldn't have chosen to become one).Eighth 1 said:So what you're saying is, vegetarians are smarter because they 'realize' that steak comes from cows? And what, everyone else just thinks that farmer brown and his cows make it in their magical workshop like santa and his fucking elves? Yeah... No, not buying it.Orinon said:"It is very, very VERY easy to just eat a slab of meat in front of you, and not care. But Vegetarians actually take the time to consider where that steak came from. The basic idea here is this: The vegetarians intelligence didn't just appear because they don't eat meat, It's from the mindset they possessed which made them realize where that steak came from "
In my less empathetic point of view, we put restrictions on ourselves because together we can accomplish fantastic goals. But the most we can accomplish with cows is medium rare steak.Cadmium Magenta said:Hi forum!
We are moral beings and as a result of our morality, we place innumerable restrictions on ourselves for the greater good: We prohibit or disapprove of theft, murder, rape, deception, defamation etc.
So why do we think it's okay to deprive an entire species of their liberty and kill them for their flesh?
What do you think? I'm very curious to know.
Sorry, but you're wrong right there. Humans ARE animals.Cadmium Magenta said:but we are not animals.
Hi, yes all very well and good so far, save that last point. Sam Neil told me to eat red meat 3-4 times a week, and Sam Neil doesn't lie!Cadmium Magenta said:Hi forum!
After watching MovieBob's recent Big Picture episode on the PeTA/Super Mario controversy, I'm curious about people's stance on animal rights here. What I found curious is that Bob asserted he supports animal rights, in that he abstains from products like fur and boycotts companies that test on animals. On the other hand though, eating animals does not seem to be problematic for him.
Just to be clear, I'm vegan myself and a very strong believer in animal rights, but I'm not a fan of PeTA and I absolutely agree with Bob's disapproval of their hysterical and sensationalist publicity work. Also, while I feel that being vegan is the most ethical way of living with animals, I do not view myself as being better than meat-eaters, nor do I think that eating meat makes you a bad person. Please don't see my opinion as an affront to your lifestyle and worldview. I don't mean to be hostile. My goal is to make people question some things we have been taught about the animals we eat, without shoving my own morality down their throats.
So let me just very briefly outline why I chose to become vegan:
Human beings are omnivores, which means that we can eat almost anything. There are many divergent nutritional studies and opinions out there, but the gist seems to be that we can get by equally well on meat- or plant-based diets or any combination thereof,
Sorry to interrupt again, but, that's just how the food chain works, we're at the top, we get to pick and chose to eat whatever we want, and the ethics kinda don't exist, because many animals eat other animals to survive as well - your next point would be that we don't need meat to survive, but the same studies that tell of its dietry enhancements, show that our brains grow from eating red meat, so as a species, again give me new information if you have it (link might save time and energy, up to you, would prefer link as well if you don't mind).Cadmium Magenta said:as long as we spend some time thinking about what nutrients we need and where to get them.
This means that there is no biological need for us to eat meat. We simply feel like eating it.
Therefore, whenever we kill an animal for food, we are essentially deciding that our appetite is more important than that creature's life. We are inflicting deadly violence on a defenseless being, simply for our own pleasure. Personally, I don't think that's ethical behavior.
Well basically, as far as I'm aware, the coolest reason not to be a omnivore, and just become a herbivore, is that Spock was a vegetarian; he was another species though (or half another species, half Vulcan).Cadmium Magenta said:Now, many people say that nature isn't ethical, that animals brutally kill and eat other animals all the time. That's true, but we are not animals. We are not lions or sharks. Lions or sharks cannot choose *not* to eat meat because they are natural carnivores and couldn't survive on a herbivorous diet. Humans, on the other hand, can. We are moral beings and as a result of our morality, we place innumerable restrictions on ourselves for the greater good: We prohibit or disapprove of theft, murder, rape, deception, defamation etc.
So why do we think it's okay to deprive an entire species of their liberty and kill them for their flesh?
To sum it up: Just because we *can* eat anything, doesn't necessarily mean that we *should*.
What do you think? I'm very curious to know.
There are two types of vegans, the kind that just don't eat meat like my friend Jordan and the "holier than thou" such as yourself. Let me ask you something ol chap, how many bugs have you squashed? If roaches moved into your house, would you let them stay or would you kill them off? What if some mice decided to start eating your vegetables for you? If a few New York rats came in to setup an Italian restaurant using old family recipes, would you let them keep the place as long as they paid rent? Like all us "evil" meat eaters, you'd get rid of them, by lethal force if needed.Cadmium Magenta said:-My sniping hand, how it does hurt-
No, I didn't. I said they can feel those emotions, not that they experience them in the same way humans do.AndyFromMonday said:You certainly suggested that. The idea that animals can feel emotions outside of instinct is laughable. They're not sentient and our species is much more important than the pointless life of a cow or a pig. We thrive, they survive.Khada said:snip
I think I smell a massive hypocrite. Guess what. Plants are living creatures too, and there is no biological need for us to eat them. We simply feel like it. And don't forget that unless you're out their picking your own food by hand, you're killing animals yourself. [http://www.thebestpageintheuniverse.net/c.cgi?u=grill] Why do you think it's okay to deprive an entire species of their liberty and kill them as long as you don't plan to eat them after you kill them?Cadmium Magenta said:My goal is to make people question some things we have been taught about the animals we eat, without shoving my own morality down their throats.
...
This means that there is no biological need for us to eat meat. We simply feel like eating it.
Therefore, whenever we kill an animal for food, we are essentially deciding that our appetite is more important than that creature's life. We are inflicting deadly violence on a defenseless being, simply for our own pleasure. Personally, I don't think that's ethical behavior.
Now, many people say that nature isn't ethical, that animals brutally kill and eat other animals all the time. That's true, but we are not animals. We are not lions or sharks. Lions or sharks cannot choose *not* to eat meat because they are natural carnivores and couldn't survive on a herbivorous diet. Humans, on the other hand, can. We are moral beings and as a result of our morality, we place innumerable restrictions on ourselves for the greater good: We prohibit or disapprove of theft, murder, rape, deception, defamation etc.
So why do we think it's okay to deprive an entire species of their liberty and kill them for their flesh?
To sum it up: Just because we *can* eat anything, doesn't necessarily mean that we *should*.
What do you think? I'm very curious to know.
This post explains so much. Thank you, Orekoya.Orekoya said:That's inaccurate. Being an omnivore doesn't mean we can eat almost anything and will survive. By that logic you can eat your feces, which is edible, and survive the rest of your life. The "gist" you are mentioning is actually extremely bias because science has found out that the reason we gained our sentience is because the protein of meats added to our diet specifically made our brains bigger. By raising any human on a strictly vegan diet you are essentially devolving them.
The real gist of science is the more complex the diet, the more complex the creature.
That's inaccurate. Being an omnivore doesn't mean we can eat almost anything and will survive. By that logic you can eat your feces, which is edible, and survive the rest of your life. The "gist" you are mentioning is based in opinion with no factual back-up because science has found out that the reason we gained our sentience is because the protein of meats added to our diet specifically made our brains bigger [http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/secondhandsmoke/2010/08/07/human-omnivores-meat-made-our-brains-bigger/]. By raising any human on a strictly vegan diet you are essentially devolving them.Cadmium Magenta said:Human beings are omnivores, which means that we can eat almost anything. There are many divergent nutritional studies and opinions out there, but the gist seems to be that we can get by equally well on meat- or plant-based diets or any combination thereof, as long as we spend some time thinking about what nutrients we need and where to get them.
This means that there is no biological need for us to eat meat. We simply feel like eating it.
No. We are.Cadmium Magenta said:That's true, but we are not animals.
Also plants can live for weeks after being pulled from the ground/trees/etc which is why they still have their colors. When you eat your plants, you are eating them alive.mjc0961 said:I think I smell a massive hypocrite. Guess what. Plants are living creatures too, and there is no biological need for us to eat them. We simply feel like it.