BobDobolina said:
The (ridiculous) Australian laws are regulating porn.
My understanding is that they
were regulating porn. Australia already has legal precedent for animated characters (Simpsons and Powerpuff Girls specifically [1]) being treated as real in pornography trials.
All it takes is for one concerned citizen to cry "porn" and there's abolsutely nothing short of uncommon sense stopping it from becoming technical "porn".
Furthermore, there were allegations flying around in early 2010 over possible new regulations that cup-size is specifically taken into account when determining what age to treat them as. The source of these was the Australian Sex Party, a left wing minor political party in early 2010, citing experiences during an information session where allegedly small breasts were a determining factor in banning some "barely legal" (yet still legal) themed porn.
In the end, the mistake turned out to be theirs, and the assertation that 20-somethings with A-cup breasts are all treated equivalent to children was completely overblown[2].
However, whilst the situation was not nearly as dire as the party had made it out to be, the issue did persuade the media to dig up a bunch of somewhat arbitrary rulings.
The very fact that censorship decisions in Australia are determined "case by case" with no clear guidelines and in turn steamroll out inconsistent precedent ... let's just say, if I were a publisher with a monetary stake in something, I wouldn't give two shits about playing the righteous political card and instead turn around, bend over and play it damn well safe, treating even hearsay as real.
1. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/7770781.stm
2. http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/01/29/has-australia-really-banned-small-breasts/