...in front of your enemy's child?

[2012 Wont Happen]

Depends on the reason for my anger. If I was killing him for personal revenge, I would wait till a different time. If I knew I'd get another chance, I would also wait. However, if I was carrying out an assassination and this might be my only chance, I would eliminate my target regardless of the kid.

 

[Rolling Thunder]

This is somewhat irrelevant, as when I get into an enemy hideout I don't bother to even try and kill the big bad. I just level it with explosives. So, yes, I guess I killed the kid, but I neither knew nor would particularly have cared. I'm not particularly discriminate when it comes to vengeance.

 

[CloggedDonkey]

shoot the child and leave. I wouldn't kill my enemy, just his child to make him know how I felt when he killed my family/burned down my village/destroyed a city.

 

[dalek sec]

Blast him with the biggest gun I can find.

 

[webgurupc]

Turn off the game. Remove the disk from the drive. Scratch it along the concrete before it lands in the bin with the dog turds.

Cause thats where games motivated by revenge violence belong.

 

[wildpeaks]

I'd kill the bastard out of the kid's sight, then make sure the kid is raised by honest teachers, that way he can choose of his own free will if he wants to revenge his bastard parent or join me (but I'd be prepared to kick his ass if he comes after me).

 

[hudsonzero]

first i will check to see if the child isent just a stratgecly placed hostage

 

[wildpeaks]

Cause thats where games motivated by revenge violence belong.

While I agree with the concept, I have a hard time thinking of a recent game not motivated by revenge in one way or another right now :/

 

[Connosaurus Rex]

I would kill all, and I mean all if I just killed scores of men and women then an extra one child is permitted. Just hope to the good spirits that the ends justifies the means.

 

[cheese_wizington]

Scenario: You've been on a long journey to kill your enemy. If this was a book/movie the audience would be rooting for you to storm into the lair of your enemy and have an epic final showdown. and normally you would. You have your reasons to want this person dead, whatever reason it may be, they may be planning to destroy a city or they have murdered your whole village, or another "justifiable" reason to end this person's life.

However when you burst into where your enemy is, blood stained from all the minor threats in the way, with rock music blaring in the background, you notice your enemy sitting down... with their child. Under normal circumstances you would have engaged your enemy to a fight to the death (or just shoot them in the face) and settle matters, but how would this child affect your next actions? (if at all)

Edit: The child in this scenario is 12 years old.

Reminds me of the Bourne Identity.

OT: Time to scar a child for life!

 

[whycantibelinus]

That's like what if you were trying to kill Hitler and you popped in on him right when he is reading a nursery rhyme to his kid. You fucking kill him...........that's just the way it goes, tough shit for the kid.

 

[RanD00M]

Kill the enemy and raise the child as my own.

Every case in fiction where I've seen this approach, it fails.

That's because they don´t know my method.

BRAINWASH!!

 

[TheScarecrow]

Scenario: You've been on a long journey to kill your enemy. If this was a book/movie the audience would be rooting for you to storm into the lair of your enemy and have an epic final showdown. and normally you would. You have your reasons to want this person dead, whatever reason it may be, they may be planning to destroy a city or they have murdered your whole village, or another "justifiable" reason to end this person's life.

However when you burst into where your enemy is, blood stained from all the minor threats in the way, with rock music blaring in the background, you notice your enemy sitting down... with their child. Under normal circumstances you would have engaged your enemy to a fight to the death (or just shoot them in the face) and settle matters, but how would this child affect your next actions? (if at all)

Edit: The child in this scenario is 12 years old.

This seems a lot like Kill Bill Volume two.

 

[Metropocalypse]

I would decapitate him and take his headband!

 

[Shynobee]

Pop the kid first, then go for the main victim. Its insult to injury, and is a safety measure as it prevents the kid from coming to get revenge on me.

 

[FallenRainbows]

One thing would drive me to that and I'd probably blow the kids's head of just to make him suffer as I did, then kill him.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[sub]"Love can drive a man insane, loss too can drive a man insane. A lost love will drive a man to kill"
~Me[/sub]

 

[Gather]

Become best bro's (In the "I'm gonna kill you but later" way) and save the world as outside, it's raining aliens and we are the only two capable people in the world to do it...

And the kid makes me realize that. At the end, I would no longer have the urge to kill my bestest friend and we raise the kid together in the same household.

 

[RatRace123]

I would stare at the child coldly as I do, and say "remember my face"

Then I would be the villain in the sequel.

 

[Sir Prize]

Well, I'd go to me enemy and tell him that he should get the kid out of the room, quickly and would then hope that mt enemy would do that, out of fear for his/her child's life. I'd then kill him/her and leave.

Just because they have a child shouldn't mean that it makes what they right and that way the child doesn't have to see their parent die.

 

[Hazy]

Kill em all.

I pardon no child, as he will come to hunt me down. That will not be acceptable.