Heh. I lol'd. Oh Trailmix, your bluntness never ceases to amuse me.Old Trailmix said:I think she should be shot.
But she wasn't doing it out of mercy! I have seen the video and she cheers and laughs when she throws them in. She is just a horrible person and deserves to be punished. How can you defend her actions? And I admit that because it was puppies I felt more horrified and I really did hate the woman! But why wouldn't someone who has lived with dogs all their lives take this to heart?Mad Stalin said:How would you get rid of them then? It's not like it's cheap to pay a vet to put them down you know.How would you get rid of them then? It's not like it's cheap to pay a vet to put them down you know. People are just crying because it is little puppies, truth is dogs are a pestilence in alot of places. Bet you didn't hear anything about the people who lit their hamster on fire and used it as a golfball, cause you know, it's a hamster and noone gives a shit about hamsters. If she had tortured them or something, then yea, she should be punished, but thats not the case so all she should get would be a like 400 euro fine or something similar. I may be a jackass, but I am a realistic jackass.Phoenix09215 said:Yeah but I mentioned that she enjoyed it... And then you went on and said it didn't matter because they would die anyway. If she was doing it for mercy I doubt she would've drowned them in a river. Its not very humane!Mad Stalin said:way to put words in my mouth you twatsticle. Who/where did it say it was for amusement? seemed like mercy killing if you ask me, but hey, you go on and demand death penalty for animal cruelty. long live hypocrisyPhoenix09215 said:So its ok to drown a bunch of helpless puppies for your own amusement, because they would die anyway?Mad Stalin said:Its eastern Europe, they were most likely unwanted puppies and would've starved to death anyway i seriously don't get what all the fuss is aboutPhoenix09215 said:but dude... she actually threw puppies in to a river. You could hear them yelping, and she just tossed them in like they were garbage (and she enjoyed it...)Zyst said:I honestly think that Animal Cruelty is not good. But I think 6400 dollars is overdoing it a bit.
Nothing deserves to be treated like that
Thats errr real nice that... real nice
And again... I never said she should be killed, but I think she should get more then a fine because I don;t think thats the right punishment. But then again its in another part of the world to me so maybe its different there. So I am NOT a hypocrite!
You sir... are a jackass!
Over here, I'd get 20 to 30 years (which is considered a life sentence, I know it seems rather stupid. Hell, it is, but hey) if I'd throw you into a river and ensure you'll never get out. She just gets a 6400 dollar fine for (possibly, taken into consideration that this whole deal is just a clever hoax with a somewhat realistic look) killing off six puppies. I don't know about you, but taking six lives seems to be a lot cheaper than taking one.Zyst said:I honestly think that Animal Cruelty is not good. But I think 6400 dollars is overdoing it a bit.
im taking it you didnt see the video. She threw a bucket of baby dogs into a river 1 by 1 saying WHEEEE as some flew into the water. Comming from someone who dosnt find may things sick...this is sick... The puppies eyes were barely openZyst said:I honestly think that Animal Cruelty is not good. But I think 6400 dollars is overdoing it a bit.