PurpleLeafRave said:
Daedalus1942 said:
PurpleLeafRave said:
I hated the first Bioshock, but I love this one. It's so much cooler being a big daddy, and the combat is a lot better.
But... you become a big daddy in the first one :S. That doesn't make any sense. How can you hate the first but love the second?
The Story was the only thing that was good about the first one in my opinion, and it just didn't scare me. I actually thought there was greater tension and combat in the second one, and the setting and story were almost as good as the first. What I'm saying is I don't enjoy games just because of one aspect.
I mean, if the story is the only good part, why would I replay it? I actually wan't to replay Bioshock 2. This is just my opinion.
I'll grant you the first one isn't scary in the least apart from that first bit in the bathysphere until you pickup the wrench, then it all goes out the window.
The first game still had an amazing, original atmosphere to it, and the graphics for it's time were top notch.
I found the combat to be quite fun with all the hacking bots to do your bidding, and setting oil on fire or electrocuting the splicers with plasmids.
Is it possible you treated it like a normal shooter and just used guns throught the game?
You would have had to use plasmids a few times, but surely you found them useful (albeit some were a direct copy from system shock II).
What sort of diappointed me about the 2nd game (I haven't played it yet) but I've seen from reviews and screenshots, that they didn't bother updating the graphics.
I would have thought this many years on, and considering how great the first games graphics were, they'd have updated the sequel, but they're clearly using the same models, same dynamic lighting, and haven't upgraded the unreal engine in any way.