At least NASCAR lets drivers pass each other. (I watch both series religiously.)Zachary Amaranth said:I don't think the primary draw to an F1 event is the crashes.theevilsanta said:In America Nascar (our equivalent to Formula 1 i guess) is considered a "redneck" sport. Basically its biggest fans are under-educated, lower class, rural country folk. Most "intelligent" people consider a fondness for it to be a "lower class" pastime. Is it the same in the UK or Europe in general? Do upper-middle class snobs look down on it?
It always pisses me off to hear that NASCAR is a backwards, dumb sport that's all about the crashes. I hear this a lot since I live in a liberal New England town, the sort that loves their American football (a sport I don't care much for.) From what I've read in recent weeks about American football, there is a surprising emphasis on the hard hits that have recently become outlawed. It seems to me that American football fans have no right to say "NASCAR is all about the crashes", but they do anyway, the hypocrites.
To answer the OP: If you're watching NASCAR for the crashes, you're watching it wrong. I think the whole "redneck" view came about because the sport originated in the South and has a Southern fanbase. What eventually became Formula 1 started in France, but the French have done so badly in the sport that there's not really a goofy cheese-eating platoon of French drivers and fans to make fun of. And the F1 fanbase has no identifiable "center" other than Europe and Brazil. It's hard to stereotype such a diverse group.