Phyroxis said:People like to use the word piracy because it sounds cool not because of its meaning, I think. We are getting way too deep for me as I am no expert on this.AmbitiousWorm said:I hear ya. Its easily muddled. Ownership and right to use are inextricably tied when it comes to most physical things. You own your truck and are allowed to drive it. You don't own your (and technically I shouldn't even say "your" software, as its not possessed by you or me) software but are allowed to play it.Phyroxis said:[snip good call]AmbitiousWorm said:[snip cuz this ish is LOOOOONG]Phyroxis said:It is a grey area because it is easy to make copies. If it was just as easy to copy a truck we would be having the same discussion about car theft.AmbitiousWorm said:but you are paying for one of what ever it is. If every time someone downloaded a free copy of a game/movie/whatever the company that made it got money it would not be illegal. They want to own and control the rights to their productions so they can make money off them. they don't care that you broke/lost it, they want you to buy another. By downloading it you didn't pay for the second one. That's all there is to it.Timmibal said:What they consider illegal is not always the case. If it were, then every threatening e-mail you are forwarded by yout ISP after accessing a compromised tracker would be accompanied by a summons.AmbitiousWorm said:If you are going to get copies off the internet just be aware that the company that made it would, most likely, consider what you are doing illegal.
Starcraft II was supposedly the most pirated game of 2010.
You can 'Purchase' SCII, like my GOG example, by license only from battle.net, without ever actually receiving a physical 'copy' of it.
Nowhere in the EULA for Starcraft II does it say that my digital download must be obtained from blizzard/activision servers. In fact, considering that their download client is torrent based, even the 'official' downloader cannot be said to be operating purely from the official host. How accurate then can their statistics of people 'illegally' obtaining their game be said to be?
Likewise, most gamers familiar with SecuRom DRM will be familiar with being forced to crack their LEGALLY PURCHASED software in order to make it work properly. If the software is indeed licensed, not owned, as most eulas so smugly state, how is it then "Illegal" to seek to obtain a working copy of software I have obtained a legal license to operate?
Focusing on your statement of just "I know it sounds stupid but that is why pirating is illegal. Isn't it?"
Pirating is illegal because it is still theft. Theft of licenses. Theft of licenses is loss of money that could otherwise be used to feed the families (heart string pull for the win) of developers and publishers.
For fear of sounding windy. Technically Ralf's acceptance of Herbert's (again, he doesn't own it) copy of software may not be piracy at all, because there is no license theft involved. Pirates traditionally take. Ralf isn't likely to be breaking any laws by receiving. And Herbert is giving.. So is this example even piracy? If it isn't, then is getting the file (but not a fake license) over the internet piracy?
Its confusing and hard to differentiate. If its hard for the average gamer (of which I consider both of us) to get it, imagine what its like for those who don't know much about the industry or hobby. Thus we get grey and confusing and a lot of spouting.
Also I'm more of a below average gamer HA!
No more arguments? Well I'm bored, time to download some movies.