Here, I'll try to explain it in a way that makes sense, because I've noticed a lot of people being confused by this (not in this thread, just in general).AmbitiousWorm said:If mostly everyone had laid out to me reasonably and clearly why it wasn't illegal why would I have argued through 5 pages?
Let's say you buy a game. What does that entail? It's the physical game, so it means you pay for a dvd in a case with some shrink wrap on it, which is worth around a dollar maybe. The reason we pay sixty bucks for these things is because the valuable part of the game is the actual software, which is nothing more than a series of bits that happens to be represented by burn marks on the dvd. These bits are in a certain order. This order isn't a thing, instead it's an idea, a design, a recipe for the game.
Let's make a copy of that design. We take another dvd and tell the computer to burn. What happened? Well, the design, or recipe or whatever you want to call it (the actual software) got transferred to the disk. You didn't steal the blank dvd, you bought that with your own money, so it's not stealing. You didn't steal anything physical, you just copied the design from one legally obtained physical object to the next.
Let's do exactly the same thing with the truck. You buy the truck. You take it apart and analyze it, and figure out exactly how it's built and with what parts. Then you buy replacements for all the parts individually and put them together to make an exact copy of the truck. Congratulations, you just `pirated' a truck. You took the design of the original truck that you obtained legally, and copied that design over to another physical medium that you also bought legally.
That is what you're doing with software. It's just cheaper and easier to do it with software, so the design is much more valuable than the design of the truck. Does that make any more sense?
If not it's because it's 6am now and I'm tired as fuck, I'm going to bed. If you reply I'll get it when I wake up at 3pm tomorrow afternoon.