Daniel Ferguson said:
Also, the 1950's woman did all the cooking and cleaning for you. You were considered king of your own household. Obviously that's dated now, but yeah. Authority.
Is that why marriage is referred to as the "ball and chain" by men nowadays?
Most people strive for the day that they no longer need to go to work, I don't see why women would want to give that up, well I do, it was big corporation propaganda. In WW2 said big corporations realised how much more money they could be making if both men and women went to work but that's a story for another time. I'd love to be a male 1950s style housewife if it was still affordable (damn corporations

).
Just saying.
Daniel Ferguson said:
No "morning after" pill, no consequences of sex (apart from any std's you may get if unprotected)
I have a problem with these two points.
The morning after pill one: I'd love a way for men to legally abort a their child, but they don't, they lose all control over the child. A man can't even abort their financial responsibility over the child if the woman refuses to listen to the man's pleas.
No consequences part: pregnancy is a consequence for the man too for reasons I just outlined.
Condoms aren't 100% effective.