DrgoFx said:
I'm sorry if this has been mentioned before, but it dawned on me today. Imperial and Stormcloak are both bad guys. Honestly, one wants to rid the world of cultural diversity and the other just wants to ignore it and bully it. I mean the Stormcloaks are racist assholes and the Imperial are conquering asshole...It's just a choice of the lesser of two evils.
The Imperials aren't "conquering assholes"
Skyrim has been part of the Empire since the Empire was an Empire. The first Emperor was a Nord. The whole subtext of the game was about him. The Empire just finished fighting a War with the Thalmar, a war that they were losing, and then the Thalmar allowed them to surrender as long as they (along with many other stipulations) conceded that Tiber Septim never ascended to godhood, because the idea of a human ascending to godhood was completely anathema to the Thalmar.
They're trying to keep the Empire in one piece, and they have Stormcloaks in Skyrim actively attempting to sabotage all of their efforts. They're not "conquering" Skyrim. They're just trying to keep Skyrim from falling to pieces.
and while you could certainly argue that the Stormcloaks are racist, they mostly just see the Empire as collapsed - to the Stormcloaks, the thalmar beat the Empire (because they totally did), and they resent that the Empire which their race helped found has been reduced to licking Altmer boots. In their eyes, they're just the new world order, and the last line of defense against the thalmar. To them, the Thalmar and the Empire are one and the same.
Boiling the conflict between the Empire and the Stormcloaks down to "racist versus jerks that execute random people" is just not the right way to do it. It's actually a very complex and nuanced situation if you think about it. Even the Stormcloak's racism is completely justified - they're actually still fighting the war against the Thalmar - the ruling group of elves (along with the Khajiit, who folded to the Thalmar immediately) who have infiltrated their empire's highest levels and are trying to take their god away. You might not care about God, but the people of Skyrim care deeply about Talos worship. He was their guy.
imahobbit4062 said:
Anyone who doesn't side with the Empire is a fool. The facts are there that the Empire is the lesser of two evils and actually have the capability to take out the greater evil.
I disagree that the answer is as simple as that, like I said, the real question of "Stormcloak vs Empire" is, "Did the Empire Lose itself in the war against the Thalmar?" The Stormcloaks are sure that they did, and would like to see the broken Empire and its Thalmar masters (the Thalmar really kicked the Empire's ass that hard) out of Skyrim so that a new Empire can be founded in the same way Tiber Septim ascended.
The Empire sees itself as not destroyed, the Stormcloak see the empire as destroyed. And they both have good arguments. The Empire's Main argument is that it still has an emperor, and the conflict between them and the thalmar is resolved. It's trying its hardest to return things back to normal. The Stormcloaks see that the empire has fallen and been completely infiltrated by the same enemy that threatened to destroy them all. They completely hate the thalmar, and see the empire, which is rooted fairly heavily in Skyrim as a rotten core that needs to be removed so that they can be safe from the Thalmar's influence.
You're probably right that the Empire has a greater chance to bring stability to Skyrim - if they wipe out the Stormcloaks, then the last war against the Thalmar will be finished - in victory for the thalmar. Everyone will be safe, but they'll be safe under Thalmar rule, where humans are subjugated, because the Thalmar are pulling all of the strings.
Is it foolish to consider that?