I'm not sure to side with you.-Zen- said:The egg came first.
Animals laid eggs long before chickens existed.
Your point is moot.
That's what I thought. It always made sense to me.Daveman said:Surely an egg containing what is now known as a chicken came out of something very similar to but not quite a chicken. Hence the egg came first. That's what I always thought, seemed obvious.
Lets follow Freeman!Andrecova said:Freeman, who worked on HECToR with counterparts at Edinburgh's Warwick University....
your logic... ITS AMAZING!Qufang said:Of course the egg came first, I don't think anyone has a chicken for breakfast, but loads of people eat chicken for lunch and dinner.
An egg! What's the point in proving the chicken came first when they don't know where the chicken came from?Andrecova said:The only problem now is discovering how the chicken came to be in the first place, though.
no, its "what is "1337% of pi?"Miles Tormani said:What is six times eight?AndrewOfHell said:Question answered, now can we please find the 'Question' to the answer of 42?
yes but the actual answer is ''what came first the (chicken)egg or the chicken?''-Zen- said:The egg came first.
Animals laid eggs long before chickens existed.
Your point is moot.
This is an easy question, people are stupid, these scientists are stupid.Andrecova said:Lul wut?.
i understand this but i always assumed it was a chicken egg, not a random eggT-Bone24 said:Well then, I don't think you quite understand how evolution works. The egg would have been layed by something that is nearly a chicken and the offspring would be a mutation that is a chicken. That chicken then passes on its genes and more chickens are made, and eventually the previous species dies out.Poofs said:i always thought evolution came first
then chicken
then egg
then more chickens
then more eggs
Therefore, the egg comes first.