Well, for a start, fuck that, but I suppose I get what you're trying to say.YamadaJisho said:I'm not gonna say whether or not the Tsunami (or any of the other natural disasters that have been happening recently) are divine punishment or not, but I think that everyone discounting it is a bit judgemental. If a God does exist, I think he'd have a right to be angry,
Here's the thing: I don't consider a viewpoint that involves baldly asserting that the victims of a hugely destructive natural disaster deserved what they got as punishment for their moral corruption, to be a valid stance deserving of respect. If someone tries to present such things as reasonable, I'm not going to hold back on describing it as the vile, self-righteous insensitivity that it is, just because it's their opinion.and if a God doesn't exist, then this is a natural tragedy that happens because mother earth is a *****. I'm getting really tired of holier-than-thou Atheists making fun of people because they have a belief other than the Atheistic belief. How about actually trying to understand what the other side has to say and realizing that their viewpoint is just as valid as yours before jumping on the intollerance train.
Moreover, this isn't an atheist issue. This is also an issue for anyone who believes in a kind, loving god. I don't even need to be that specific. If you believe in a god who isn't a complete amoral asshole, then this is an issue for you. Why you think it's only atheists who would have a problem, or only atheists that would be offended by this, or only atheists who would be able to understand why this is a disgusting thing to say... I don't even begin to understand.
Also, you should probably learn what "intolerance" actually means. It's not a synonym for "politeness", and just being polite is not the same as being tolerant. I don't think anybody's actually demanded that he lose the right to say such things, just that he is a despicable excuse of a human being for doing so.