Jimquisition: Mass Effect 3: A Gay Erotic Love Story

Recommended Videos

Orekoya

New member
Sep 24, 2008
485
0
0
secretsantaone said:
Is it really worth it if it's cheapened? Surely it would be better to finish off this franchise and start a new one with a homosexual character, rather than shoe-horning it in so late. To me it just seems patronising, like 'here's your token gay relationship, now leave us alone.'.

On the issue of resources spent, let's have a look different at what different elements go into a videogame.


Writing - Someone has to write the romance, which characters, how it progresses, how it ends up etc.

Dialogue writing - After that, the dialogue between the characters needs to be written including multiple speech trees and paths for different conversation choices

Voice acting - Then they need to get the voice actors in to record the lines and the sound editors to get it into a fit state

Animation - Someone needs to animate the romance scenes, including a presumably unique sex scene which uses no stock animations

Coding - After that, someone needs to actually put all the different elements into the game and not have it clash with everything else

Quality control - The romance needs to be played through multiple times under different conditions to make sure there are no bugs or errors

So probably quite a bit of time I'd imagine.
This argument is so board it's pointless to even list this. I could take everything you just said and use for any argument from "Here's why they shouldn't allow any romance options" to "Here's why they shouldn't allow moral choices".

In order to have this in, it had to be planned. Back when the game was first starting, and since its elements were planned in the first one it's been in the planning since at least 2006. Nothing about Shepard beyond the actual romance dialogue trees ever seemed to say out loud what his sexual preference was, because it was always left up to the player's choice. Saying that they cheapened it and made it token seems belittling to said choice.
 

Alexnader

$20 For Steve
May 18, 2009
526
0
0
Syntax Man said:
Soooooooooooooooooooooooooo, lemme get this straight, Jim and Yahtzee can cus like sailors and the thing is fine with that, but an the mere mention of homosexuality it age gates the fucking thing?

Real mature, seems that this world still has a long way to go.

As for the actual episode...what the flying fuck was that?
Really? "The mere mention?". How was all of that a mere mention? SHEPERD POUNDING WREX'S BRIGHT GREEN ANUS DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A MERE MENTION! Yahtzee and Jim may swear but rarely are their exclamations quite so graphic or in such a high concentration. Have you ever seen those "sex story" sites or the more icky parts of deviant art? All of those stories, no less graphic than what Jim read to us now and as a whole covering a range of topics from homosexuality to heterosexuality to bestiality (as I'm told), are age gated. I have a feeling that if Jim was to graphically describe heterosexual sex, it would also be age-gated in the exact same way as his gay erotic love story.

This is not "ooh homosexuality is icky" as much as it is "ooh sex is icky" and that problem rests with Western and particularly American culture as a whole. Not the Escapist.

Anyway, the point of the story that I drew from it was to satirise mass effect fans who are complaining about their shepard having the mere potential to be gay. (Though I doubt they're complaining about the Sapphic side of things)
 

Heaven's Guardian

New member
Oct 22, 2011
117
0
0
DressedInRags said:
Heaven said:
Not that it wasn't funny, but it really was a strawman argument; I think we've had enough threads about this already, but most of the objections are about canonical authenticity and over when gay relationships were introduced.
What, so if a strait femshep decides to bat for the other team in the second installment, that's acceptable?

But when a male Shepard does it, then OMG CONTINUITY FUCKUP?

That makes no sense to me.Is femshep allowed to get away with it because they're more used to seeing girls go both ways in their porn? Has no-body told these people that men can be casually bisexual as well?
Did you play the first game at all? You do know that there was a lesbian option in the first game, right? There aren't continuity issues there. If you were referring to the ability to change your mind between games, you can't even do it in that direction; you can't start a new relationship with Liara in LotSB. And if the developers really felt the need to introduce a gay option to make a character casually bisexual when Shepard, with one exception, can't have casual sex at all, that seems like an epically poor decision, since it cannot be an action that Shepard takes in-game. So your objection is moot, and as a side note, you really should learn your homonyms.
 

notimeforlulz

New member
Mar 18, 2011
183
0
0
El Luck said:
Ok this doesn't have anything to do with the video but why am I being asked to verify my age?
The last thing this vid needs is homophobic comments: i.e: an audience under the age of 18
 

Therumancer

Citation Needed
Nov 28, 2007
9,909
0
0
Vault101 said:
[

so you say your "anti-gay"....does that mean you think gays should be "cured" in some way or another?

anyway I dont see why its a big deal, persoanlly I dont see this as "catering to a specifi group" I see it more as allowing more options for shepard..both in charachter and romance options
I've written some detailed posts on it with mixed responses, no need to start a fight about it. In short we don't have a "cure" for homosexuality that's viable right now, though ideally that will happen with time, and more akin to what I've posted in commentary on science fiction (ie have the condition elimited in the process of simply making people perfectly healthy) as opposed to some kind of witch hunt with people being run down and dragging off to surgey clinics or having needles stuck in their arm or anything.

In the short term I think gay men and lesbians need to be considered seperate issues. Men and women are differant both physically and psychologically, and this applies to homosexuals as well. Despite liberal assurances that it's not the case, the reality is that gay men ARE more likely to attack children than just about any other group. Even with the statistics put out by the left wing you see you'll notice a trend to use stats compiled from all homosexuals and then applied to the arguements, once you remove the lesbians you wind up with gays being twice as likely to attack children as straight guys which kind of destroys a lot of the point. Not to mention that such statistics are compiled with an agenda and you'd only see the left wing promoting statistics that reinforced what they wanted to say.

Most importantly though I've had a lot of experience with such things, both having been trained to deal with sexual predators, and having looked into it being a sex abuse victim myself (which does not invalidate anything I say). One thing you'll notice is that you just don't see lesbians attacking little girls, I mean sure, I'm sure there are exceptions where it's happened, but very rarely. When you hear about homosexual assault, who is it that does it? Gay men. That's not just bad press, in about a decade of working as casino security where morons leave their kids unattended off the gaming floor and don't want to pay for daycare or whatever, I have literally dealt with dozens if not hundreds of gay men trying to lure little boys, more than I've seen straight guys with little girls (and that does happen with some frequency). I have not run into a single lesbian trying to pick up little girls... so really it's not bad press, that's how it is "on the street" so to speak from someone who was paid to look out for things like this. Of course due to concerns over NAMBLA we had to treat the gay pedos with kid gloves, but that's a whole differant story.

Now don't get me wrong, I don't think gay men should be arbitrarly lined up, executed, castrated, or anything else. We're not dealing with a situation where this is the case for every gay man or anything of the sort. I do however think gay men should be registered, much like sex offenders, but without the active tracking. They should be prohibited from going places around children as a matter of policy, and probably given twice the penelties as normal for violations or if they are caught trying to actually go after children. By a lack of active tracking I mean I don't think an entire neighborhood needs to be informed that so and so is gay, but I do think schools should be basically informed, and it should be attached to IDs so if say some gay guy comes into a casino and gives his ID to be allowed to gamble casino security is aware, and can also inform the guy where to stay away from (arcades, day care, etc..) to prevent accidental tresspass and similar things.

Overall while many people would object out of hand, this is an attitude that has come from long experience, and I've gone through periods where I've been more or less extreme. This seems like a pretty middle ground compromise as it presents few limitations. To be honest as a straight guy I don't hang around schools, playgrounds, arcades, etc... unless I have a good reason (like being paid security) so really being told you can't go there isn't something that is going to hamper most people unless they are up to something to begin with. It's very much one of the cases where I actually think the maxim "only the guilty should be concerned" kind of applies. Some would talk about railing against any kind of limitation, but at the same time I'd ask WTF would an adult man with allegedly no interest in kids fight for the right to go hang around a playground or children's arcade? I mean seriously.

... and trust me, from experience, if you see some solitary guy hanging out in an arcade watching the kids there is very rarely a good reason for it. Sadly you can't do anything out of hand, but trust me, after about 10 minutes you can almost guarantee your going to have to at least step in and make your prescence known at some point (at which point the guy will almost universally go scurrying like a cockroach).

Part of it is what they called "colored glasses" when I took Criminal Justice. Basically people remain optimistic and liberal because they never really see the world properly the way how someone who does law enforcement, "high end" security work, or receives the proper training does. See, you take the right training, watch people through cameras when they don't think they are being observed, and respond to incident after incident and write (or read) report after report, you see things as they actually are, and can recognize behaviors you once wouldn't have been alarmed by for what they are.

Criminals an predators survive because they seem normal, your child molester, shoplifter, pickpocket, stairwell rapist, mugger, or whatever doesn't look like some dude from America's most wanted. He looks like your ordinary person, and can talk a good game about being harmless. Most homosexual predators for example are EXACTLY the guy who looks like the poster child for "we're unfairly maligned, and don't attack children" they don't go walking around covered in tattoos and looking like prison rapist nightmares, or dirty old men. Just like a shoplifter might be an old lady who looks like (and probably is) someone's grandmother, especially if it's part of an organized ring because people tend to be a lot more laid back with the elderly not to mention all the special laws about treating them with kid gloves and so on. You watch this crap 20 million times on a camera and it burns in.

While I'm rambling in a long post, I might as well explain how this kind of thing works as well. See, little boys are braver than girls and have immortal action and adventure fantasies in their head, they are warned, and take warnings less seriously than girls who tend to be a bit more aware of people being after them probably because people teach them more seriously. Your typical gay pedo is going to be some normal looking guy in his 20s or 30s, maybe even good looking, who hangs around an arcade or similar place, to see who has been left without parents or a sibling, and hasn't fallen in with another pack of kids. Or more indidiously for those carrying books, because kids have homework and a lot of your casino parents will have the kids their kids bring the homework to the casino. Basically the pedo will probably play a few video games, offer the kid some extra quarters or something, and then when the kid runs out offer to help him with his homework. The kid probably wants to go somewhere quiet to concentrate with a flat surface so it's pretty easy to gert the kid to enter a stairwell, where the cameras tend to be aimed at the landings. The pedo gets the kid into the stairwell and then goes to do homework with him in the middle of the landing where they can sit, or the kid can *ahem* turn around and use the steps as a flat surface. In that position it's where the pedo can do his thing and unless a security officer comes by on a patrol, at the right moment your going to find the traumatized lad crying with the guy long gone. Even if you find him, because it happened between landings there won't be a great video record since the act itself took place between landings. This is assuming the guy didn't mess with the cameras and security wasn't too busy to notice (given that there are tons of them). Now granted this rarely goes down, because well. there are procedures that make it harder to get away with, but really you'd be shocked how many normal looking dudes have tried to carry out that basic plan.
 

Zen Toombs

New member
Nov 7, 2011
2,105
0
0
manic_depressive13 said:
How was that deserving of an age verification? So crudely drawn penises are fine but the line is drawn at reading aloud slash fic?
Of course, friend. We don't want our readers turning gay, now do we?

Redlin5 said:
*slow clapping*

We are in the presence of a master satirist. Oh and that filter won't stop the kids from being turned gay.
Props.

OT: I would just like to say that even a person who enjoys the attention of men, some of that was... disturbing. To say the very least. I appreciate the satire though.
 

Panayjon

New member
Aug 12, 2008
189
0
0
All of the one-liner witticisms I want to make might get me booted from the forums for being too sexually explicit.

I now consider you awesome.

Thank you Jim.
 

Varya

Elvish Ambassador
Nov 23, 2009
457
0
0
Xanthious said:
Varya said:
Tanakh said:
I am not particulary trilled by a gay shepard, my problem is that it feels like retconning.
Realizing I'm cutting your whole rant just to bash on this one staement but I have to. This is a BS argument for several reasons.
1. A lot of people will START at ME3, and a game should, while taking it's legacy in account, try and be a stand alone work. Anyone starting at 3 have no history to "betray" by playing GayShep
2. You can play ME1 and 2 with the intention of being GayShep, but not finding a suitable partner. RPG options 4 the win.
3. People come out as gay in every period of their lives. He could have been in the closet or just bi-sexual untill now. Again, roleplay.
4 I can play as the SAME Sheppard but with different faces and different personality in all three games. They let me fuck up my own history if I want to, why on earth would that freedome not be extended to sexuality.
5 it's a friggin OPTION! If it messes with YOUR Sheppard, he can be as straight as you want to. I wanna give it to Garrus up the arse, why would you care if I do that?
Well if we accomodatd your Shepard then what about the people that want to be able to bugger livestock with their Shepard? Are they not as important as the gay crowd? What about the people out there that want a pedo Shepard? Do we accommodate them too and maybe throw a couple little boys on the ship? These are all just options after all.
So because EVERY choice isn't avaiable no choice should be? I mean come on. OK, I'm gonna go against my better judgement and take you seriously.
Having romance potions is not a new thing in ME. We're simply expanding on themes, not taking things in new directions. So expanding romance options is NOT the same as letting everyone decide if they wanna battle reapers or herd cows. Not that that is unheard of, in ME1 you couldn't pursue you lifelong goal of looking at a scanner for hours at an end, but the BioWare went crazy and let you do that in ME2, while everyone who made their Sheppard enjoy driving a car in ME1 had their experience ruined because they could no longer take long drives at the surfaces of barren worlds.
As for ypur second point, if you don't understand the difference in how appropriate it is for a character to be gay and be a pedophile, you've got serious problems. I mean, honest to god, long hours of therapy, kind of problems. If you think homosexuality is objectionable in and of itself, a so called "homofobe", which is the logical conclution I do from someone comparing homosexuality with pedophilia, then say so, so that I can dismiss you for a little twat. I sincerely hope you simply used an ill-adviced comaprison and are in fact, not a little twat.
 

Vault101

I'm in your mind fuzz
Sep 26, 2010
18,863
15
43
Therumancer said:
Vault101 said:
[

so you say your "anti-gay"....does that mean you think gays should be "cured" in some way or another?

anyway I dont see why its a big deal, persoanlly I dont see this as "catering to a specifi group" I see it more as allowing more options for shepard..both in charachter and romance options
snip.
having a "cure for the gay" is an ethical shitstorm... and the fact is pletny WONT want to be cured

also is pedopheillia the same as Gayness?


I mean is a man who molests a boy "actually" gay (gay in that he has a sex life with other gay med) or is he only interested in little boys? if so theres a difference

also..attachting a stigma to being gay like that...can you jsut imagine? what would set everything back, "coming out" would be a death sentence and nto to mention gay youth suicides

I still think your lumping all gay men together
 

GingieAle

New member
May 2, 2011
55
0
0
That was probably the most amazing thing I have ever have and ever will hear.

Thank god for Jim Sterling!
 

Orekoya

New member
Sep 24, 2008
485
0
0
Therumancer said:
What are you talking about? If you are going to say anything so dripping with bullshit please come with a source so it can be torn apart.

Prepubescent boy are inherently feminine in biological design, being nearly identical to prepubescent girls everywhere but genitalia. Gay men are attracted to MEN, aka masculine features. If you are going to do anything stupid like equating sexual deviancy to sexual preferences then at least make the most logical connection there is: straight men are the pedophiles.

But sexual deviancy isn't about sexual preferences. It's not even about sex. Power, control and anger are the always primary motives. In a study of 1300 convicted rapists, few were diagnosed as mentally or emotionally ill: most were well-adjusted people who had a greater tendency to express their anger through violence and rage.
 

Varya

Elvish Ambassador
Nov 23, 2009
457
0
0
Therumancer said:
Vault101 said:
[

so you say your "anti-gay"....does that mean you think gays should be "cured" in some way or another?

anyway I dont see why its a big deal, persoanlly I dont see this as "catering to a specifi group" I see it more as allowing more options for shepard..both in charachter and romance options
I've written some detailed posts on it with mixed responses, no need to start a fight about it. In short we don't have a "cure" for homosexuality that's viable right now, though ideally that will happen with time, and more akin to what I've posted in commentary on science fiction (ie have the condition elimited in the process of simply making people perfectly healthy) as opposed to some kind of witch hunt with people being run down and dragging off to surgey clinics or having needles stuck in their arm or anything.

In the short term I think gay men and lesbians need to be considered seperate issues. Men and women are differant both physically and psychologically, and this applies to homosexuals as well. Despite liberal assurances that it's not the case, the reality is that gay men ARE more likely to attack children than just about any other group. Even with the statistics put out by the left wing you see you'll notice a trend to use stats compiled from all homosexuals and then applied to the arguements, once you remove the lesbians you wind up with gays being twice as likely to attack children as straight guys which kind of destroys a lot of the point. Not to mention that such statistics are compiled with an agenda and you'd only see the left wing promoting statistics that reinforced what they wanted to say.

Most importantly though I've had a lot of experience with such things, both having been trained to deal with sexual predators, and having looked into it being a sex abuse victim myself (which does not invalidate anything I say). One thing you'll notice is that you just don't see lesbians attacking little girls, I mean sure, I'm sure there are exceptions where it's happened, but very rarely. When you hear about homosexual assault, who is it that does it? Gay men. That's not just bad press, in about a decade of working as casino security where morons leave their kids unattended off the gaming floor and don't want to pay for daycare or whatever, I have literally dealt with dozens if not hundreds of gay men trying to lure little boys, more than I've seen straight guys with little girls (and that does happen with some frequency). I have not run into a single lesbian trying to pick up little girls... so really it's not bad press, that's how it is "on the street" so to speak from someone who was paid to look out for things like this. Of course due to concerns over NAMBLA we had to treat the gay pedos with kid gloves, but that's a whole differant story.

Now don't get me wrong, I don't think gay men should be arbitrarly lined up, executed, castrated, or anything else. We're not dealing with a situation where this is the case for every gay man or anything of the sort. I do however think gay men should be registered, much like sex offenders, but without the active tracking. They should be prohibited from going places around children as a matter of policy, and probably given twice the penelties as normal for violations or if they are caught trying to actually go after children. By a lack of active tracking I mean I don't think an entire neighborhood needs to be informed that so and so is gay, but I do think schools should be basically informed, and it should be attached to IDs so if say some gay guy comes into a casino and gives his ID to be allowed to gamble casino security is aware, and can also inform the guy where to stay away from (arcades, day care, etc..) to prevent accidental tresspass and similar things.

Overall while many people would object out of hand, this is an attitude that has come from long experience, and I've gone through periods where I've been more or less extreme. This seems like a pretty middle ground compromise as it presents few limitations. To be honest as a straight guy I don't hang around schools, playgrounds, arcades, etc... unless I have a good reason (like being paid security) so really being told you can't go there isn't something that is going to hamper most people unless they are up to something to begin with. It's very much one of the cases where I actually think the maxim "only the guilty should be concerned" kind of applies. Some would talk about railing against any kind of limitation, but at the same time I'd ask WTF would an adult man with allegedly no interest in kids fight for the right to go hang around a playground or children's arcade? I mean seriously.

... and trust me, from experience, if you see some solitary guy hanging out in an arcade watching the kids there is very rarely a good reason for it. Sadly you can't do anything out of hand, but trust me, after about 10 minutes you can almost guarantee your going to have to at least step in and make your prescence known at some point (at which point the guy will almost universally go scurrying like a cockroach).

Part of it is what they called "colored glasses" when I took Criminal Justice. Basically people remain optimistic and liberal because they never really see the world properly the way how someone who does law enforcement, "high end" security work, or receives the proper training does. See, you take the right training, watch people through cameras when they don't think they are being observed, and respond to incident after incident and write (or read) report after report, you see things as they actually are, and can recognize behaviors you once wouldn't have been alarmed by for what they are.

Criminals an predators survive because they seem normal, your child molester, shoplifter, pickpocket, stairwell rapist, mugger, or whatever doesn't look like some dude from America's most wanted. He looks like your ordinary person, and can talk a good game about being harmless. Most homosexual predators for example are EXACTLY the guy who looks like the poster child for "we're unfairly maligned, and don't attack children" they don't go walking around covered in tattoos and looking like prison rapist nightmares, or dirty old men. Just like a shoplifter might be an old lady who looks like (and probably is) someone's grandmother, especially if it's part of an organized ring because people tend to be a lot more laid back with the elderly not to mention all the special laws about treating them with kid gloves and so on. You watch this crap 20 million times on a camera and it burns in.

While I'm rambling in a long post, I might as well explain how this kind of thing works as well. See, little boys are braver than girls and have immortal action and adventure fantasies in their head, they are warned, and take warnings less seriously than girls who tend to be a bit more aware of people being after them probably because people teach them more seriously. Your typical gay pedo is going to be some normal looking guy in his 20s or 30s, maybe even good looking, who hangs around an arcade or similar place, to see who has been left without parents or a sibling, and hasn't fallen in with another pack of kids. Or more indidiously for those carrying books, because kids have homework and a lot of your casino parents will have the kids their kids bring the homework to the casino. Basically the pedo will probably play a few video games, offer the kid some extra quarters or something, and then when the kid runs out offer to help him with his homework. The kid probably wants to go somewhere quiet to concentrate with a flat surface so it's pretty easy to gert the kid to enter a stairwell, where the cameras tend to be aimed at the landings. The pedo gets the kid into the stairwell and then goes to do homework with him in the middle of the landing where they can sit, or the kid can *ahem* turn around and use the steps as a flat surface. In that position it's where the pedo can do his thing and unless a security officer comes by on a patrol, at the right moment your going to find the traumatized lad crying with the guy long gone. Even if you find him, because it happened between landings there won't be a great video record since the act itself took place between landings. This is assuming the guy didn't mess with the cameras and security wasn't too busy to notice (given that there are tons of them). Now granted this rarely goes down, because well. there are procedures that make it harder to get away with, but really you'd be shocked how many normal looking dudes have tried to carry out that basic plan.
Holy shit, I don't even know where to begin.
I'm just gonna write a few points and then weep for the world a bit.
Pedophilia and homosexuality is NOT the same thing! I'm not gonna claim to be an expert but for pedophiles, the sex of the child is often irrelevant, but as you say, boys are braver, and therefore and easeier target. This does not mean pedophiles are gay.
I'm not even gonna try and debunk your "numbers" here but I'll just say that sexual deviances is more frequent in an evniorment where you're not accepeted as you are, so IF (big if) there's any truth to yuour numbers, it's more than likely the fault of people like you.
Equating homosexualtiy woth pedophilia is fucking disgusting, of course you'll hate gays if you thing that they are the same as pedos, but they're not.
You talk of wanting to cure the gay? News flash, they don't want to be cured and you have no fucking right to inflict your worldview on them (thank god)
And as for wanting to track Gays, holy shit you do realise what you are saying? Ever heard of innocent untill proven guilty? And as for why annyone not a pedo would be upset if they were forbidden to enter a school? How about them beng upset for being singled out and treated as jews in WWII Germany. I normaly try and avoid Goodwin but you speak of making gay's having to be marked as fucking cattle
I realise your problems are too deep to be swayed by a furious guy on a forum, but serIously, get perspective. Go get some facts, a bit of perspective.
People like you make me physically ill, and I try and maintain a civil,tone, but you are talking about some of my friends and family here so it's a bit close to home.
 

Varya

Elvish Ambassador
Nov 23, 2009
457
0
0
Orekoya said:
Vault101 said:
What are you talking about? If you are going to say anything so dripping with bullshit please come with a source so it can be torn apart.

Prepubescent boy are inherently feminine in biological design, being nearly identical to prepubescent girls everywhere but genitalia. Gay men are attracted to MEN, aka masculine features. If you are going to do anything stupid like equating sexual deviancy to sexual preferences then at least make the most logical connection there is: straight men are the pedophiles.

But sexual deviancy isn't about sexual preferences. It's not even about sex. Power, control and anger are the always primary motives. In a study of 1300 convicted rapists, few were diagnosed as mentally or emotionally ill: most were well-adjusted people who had a greater tendency to express their anger through violence and rage.
I think you quoted the wrong guy
 

Loethlin

Itchy Witch
Apr 24, 2011
199
0
0
Ooh, touchy subject.

As for the video: I felt uncomfortable looking a Jim when he was reading it. Not sure why. I probably prefer my slash in written form rather than dramatic reading. But I got the point of it.
As for the "story" itself, I've read better. But also I've read far, far worse, so good on you.

I really don't understand the people bitching about this whole issue. Noone is forcing anybody into anything.
 

DanDeFool

Elite Member
Aug 19, 2009
1,891
0
41
Syntax Man said:
Soooooooooooooooooooooooooo, lemme get this straight, Jim and Yahtzee can cus like sailors and the thing is fine with that, but an the mere mention of homosexuality it age gates the fucking thing?

Real mature, seems that this world still has a long way to go.

As for the actual episode...what the flying fuck was that?
I think it's more the graphic descriptions of homosexual coitus. A bit too spicy for the palates of the kiddies.

As for the episode itself, clearly a cautionary tale, though Jim was courteous enough not to spoil the twist ending.

The player didn't catch the gay from Mass Effect at all. Rather both our protagonist and Mass Effect were tragic victims of the same vile force.

Origin.

Yes, EA's online content distribution service, which is so gay that anything it touches immediately begins craving rock-hard dick. Note Jim's description of the player's PC, warmly accepting the Mass Effect DVD, as if to say, "ooh baby! Stick it in me!". Clearly, even the protagonist's computer was feeling the effects.

Also, that's why EA calls it "Origin". Because it's the "origin" of all gayness.

...

Okay, I'm done now.
 

Iron Lightning

Lightweight Extreme
Oct 19, 2009
1,237
0
0
Therumancer said:
In the short term I think gay men and lesbians need to be considered seperate issues. Men and women are differant both physically and psychologically, and this applies to homosexuals as well. Despite liberal assurances that it's not the case, the reality is that gay men ARE more likely to attack children than just about any other group. Even with the statistics put out by the left wing you see you'll notice a trend to use stats compiled from all homosexuals and then applied to the arguements, once you remove the lesbians you wind up with gays being twice as likely to attack children as straight guys which kind of destroys a lot of the point. Not to mention that such statistics are compiled with an agenda and you'd only see the left wing promoting statistics that reinforced what they wanted to say.
Your anecdotal evidence proves no prevailing trends. Give me some good statistics or I will be forced to conclude that you're talking out of your ass.
 

Grey Day for Elcia

New member
Jan 15, 2012
1,773
0
0
I dislike Jim a great deal. I've yet to see him do anything that doesn't involve cheap tricks at attention grabbing and over-the-top, satire riddled rants to show a point more easily demonstrable with a single paragraph. In fact, I would feel confident Jim has yet to lend his asinine, shouting voice to any topic not already covered--and in a much better way. He seems to waltz in on a topic, throw out a vulgar slam or two and cop a bunch of attention, with people praising his ability to deliver a 'no fluff punch' to the opposition. There's plenty of fluff here, folks; 99% of Jim's 'work' is fluff. The other individuals and parties more ably covering these issues are sadly overlooked when someone puts on a show and raises their voice.

Not cutting edge. Not intelligent. Not funny.

Pull a stunt like Jim here and be labeled an arrogant troll. You'd be banned in a heartbeat and you'd have an inbox full of critics. But sure enough, put it in video form and you can easily bat away what little opposition arises from the muted, over-moderated forum, with a quiff about them taking it too serious. Half of Jim's stunt writings are deliberate trolling and offensive drivel--the kind reported for being abusive and unnecessary. Yes, Escapist, by all means have two separate rule books for your content and the forum goers. There is nothing silly about profiting off loud-mouthed, arrogant rants while similtaneously hammering down on the same in your own home.

Also, the whole fake egomanical bend/god complex mask is irritating beyond compare. Saying "I'm only kidding" whenever someone critics your style doesn't make it any less idiotic and childish to spend the previous five minutes prancing about and shouting at the audience.

You can act a fool all you want, it doesn't make your point any more funny or insightful for it.

And no, there is no stick up my ass. Try again.