Yep. It has ALL of those implications and problems. But it remains true. You don't actually have to be a member of any given racial group to be discriminated against as if you were.The_root_of_all_evil said:So you can be racist against someone purely by what race you SAY they are, rather than what race they actually are?Lukeje said:Race isn't just phenotypical, it's social. As long as people associate with being Welsh (or people are associated with being Welsh) they continue to be a separate race (according to the very fuzzy definition of race commonly in use, anyway).
You do realise the shit-storm that brews up, don't you? Especially given that Kelis is American. Not Nigerian. Or can Kelis claim ancestry of Puerto Rico, China, Africa, Nigeria and America at the same time?
She is claiming racism against her race which isn't her race, while being racist to people she doesn't know the race of.
As long as you have enough similarity to such a group (as far as a narrow-minded racist conceives of it, anyway,) you can be subjected to racism.
Unfortunately, what you think of yourself won't figure into it unless the person being racist will actually listen to you in the first place.
Anyway, this whole thing is rather stupid. the UK has plenty of racists, but it's also a rather different culture to the US. Expecting people to react to it the way they do there is... Well, strange.
(And what kind of person in the UK would imply a black woman was a slave anyway? Most of the UK's black population have no history of slavery at all... It makes so little sense it's almost bizarre.)