I feel sorry for him that he had to cut his vacation with his daughter short just to record a demo for GaGa to hear were in fact it's her beat and rhythm in Al Weird lyric. I listen to the demo and it's good so what the hell Gaga?
Because recording and producing a song, even a song-parody that uses already set music, takes very long to do, and costs quite a bit of money. He receives no money from the song being on Youtube or for a free mp3. Not only that, but if you read the blog post, you'd see that he delayed release of his album so he could do the Lady Gaga song.MiracleOfSound said:Seems like a dick move on his behalf. Why does this musical moral code of his not apply to Youtube and MP3s?
He had every right to release the song without Gaga's consent. Instead he decided that he wouldn't and respect her opinion, but he already went through all the trouble to make the song (despite the fact Gaga had plenty of opportunity to say "No" somewhere earlier down the line) so he figures he might as well share it with his fans. I don't see how that makes him a dick.Generic Gamer said:According to his blog it was because:MiracleOfSound said:Yeah... I don't get that. Why would he release it on Youtube if he didn't put it on his album out of some moral code?Generic Gamer said:Also releasing it anyway was pretty fucking petulant.
which just makes him sound like a dick. I think he's so used to people saying yes that he came to believe they would always say yes. I mean, yeah, as an artist that's a royal pain in the arse but I'd have thought that was the kind of crap he's have contingencies for."However, given the circumstances, I have no problem with allowing people to hear it online, because I also have a personal policy not to completely waste my stinking time."
Because he doesn't make money off of YouTube or free MP3s?MiracleOfSound said:Seems like a dick move on his behalf. Why does this musical moral code of his not apply to Youtube and MP3s?Virgil said:He'll post the MP3s as well. He's done it in the past - for example, with You're Pitiful [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/You%27re_Pitiful].CM156 said:Might want to grab it while you can
He's legally allowed to release them - parody is a long-standing fair use exception to copyright - he just chooses not to sell them unless he gets permission. Normally he doesn't even make them until he gets permission, but in the rare exceptions he's had no problem releasing them for free.
Recording and producing a parody does not take a lot of time and money. No more love and time and effort than the original writer spent creating it.HigherTomorrow said:Because recording and producing a song, even a song-parody that uses already set music, takes very long to do, and costs quite a bit of money. He receives no money from the song being on Youtube or for a free mp3. Not only that, but if you read the blog post, you'd see that he delayed release of his album so he could do the Lady Gaga song.
Great song xDCM156 said:You do know that it is on youtube, right?
Might want to grab it while you can