FogHornG36 said:FogHornG36 said:"irrelevant" So when the black check asks isn't it ironic that you are not letting them take back consent after the filming is already done, that it is Irrelevant that she brings up what the irony is based on? The black chick says she sounds like a 12 year old girl because she has lost, and what feminist do when they lose, is they attack, and insult, the change the subject, they call you a sexist, a bigot, a racist, anything to hijack the conversation and make it about you defending yourself now.Pluvia said:FogHornG36 said:I enjoyed the end part were the black chick is unable to continue the debate so she has to go right to insulting her, im suprised she didn't just call her a racist.To jump in here, the black girl does say "So you're sounding a little bit like a 12 year old because this is irrelevant" and the video then cuts. Statement about Southern sounding a little bit like a 12 year old aside, the black girl is right in this instance, Southern's rant was actually irrelevant to what they were discussing.Adam Jensen said:She was bewildered by logic. It was her first encounter with it.
Secondly, Does it mater that southern is getting agitated while dealing with these people? no, what she says maters.Except the film has yet to be used. Funny that you ignore they can still stop and not use it. But really expected you'd ignore itSecondhand Revenant said:I think it's terrible you don't think women can take back consent during sex. It was still being filmed. Also it wasn't shown to anyone yet. So not a past event! Really, you shouldn't support not being able to stop giving consent.[/quotFogHornG36 said:NOOOOOO You don't get to reinterpret what she said to make you feel better, the black chick was saying, isn't it ironic that you are not letting them take back consent after the fact?: when talking about being on camera, The irony is based on the feminist idea that woman should be able to take bake consent after sex.Skatologist said:FogHornG36 said:snip1. That was a weird cut at the end. One that looked as though the black woman was going to continue to talk.Adam Jensen said:snap
2.You do realize what that black woman could have meant, right? Withdrawing consent from sex while having it? Or even just withdrawing consent prior to the act while initially saying "yes"?
It doesn't work your way because the filming is already done.I think its terrible you think they gays should be put into death camps! what? you didn't say that? well i didn't say woman can't take back consent "DURING" sex. Stop trying to sensationalize and attack who you are debating.Secondhand Revenant said:I think it's terrible you don't think women can take back consent during sex. It was still being filmed. Also it wasn't shown to anyone yet. So not a past event! Really, you shouldn't support not being able to stop giving consent.FogHornG36 said:NOOOOOO You don't get to reinterpret what she said to make you feel better, the black chick was saying, isn't it ironic that you are not letting them take back consent after the fact?: when talking about being on camera, The irony is based on the feminist idea that woman should be able to take bake consent after sex.Skatologist said:FogHornG36 said:snip1. That was a weird cut at the end. One that looked as though the black woman was going to continue to talk.Adam Jensen said:snap
2.You do realize what that black woman could have meant, right? Withdrawing consent from sex while having it? Or even just withdrawing consent prior to the act while initially saying "yes"?
It doesn't work your way because the filming is already done.
Once you have consented to being filmed, and then have been filmed, filming is done. Much like sex, you can't decided afterwords that you didn't like the way it turned out and take back consent.
And that you can stop filming right then.