Louzon said:
The weirdest thing that they say, from my point of view, is the overpriced games part. I understand that PC gaming has its advantages, but from a financial standpoint (speaking as a married father of two with a very low gaming budget), it seems like PC gaming is actually MORE expensive, due to the fact that almost every 6 months you have to update your system to play the newer games, and I can play a PS3 for years, or the WiiU (again, family man, we have a Wii for the kids to play, and thus already have four controllers for the next system to save me that $200+, lol) and still have games that they make for the console for years and years.
What? That's rubbish. You should only be having to upgrade every 3-4 years MAX (you could easily run most games nowadays with a 4 year old system that was mid-range at the time of purchase) with these overly long console cycles.
Let me break it down for you.. many people NEED computers, whether it be for work, emails, internet usage etc. Now, add $300-400 to that cost, and you can get your self a decent mid-range PC that will last you for quite a while, and you can do a helluva lot more than play games on it.
Or you can pay $300 for an archaic, underspecced, closed source system, which you aren't allowed to modify, and if you want to get the full experience (seeing as most systems don't have anywhere near enough exclusives on their own to justify them as your sole gaming machine), you have to buy 3 consoles, each at $200-300, and with $60 games at launch.. unless you buy them secondhand in which case you can't play online, or some other bullshit like that.
I'm a PC only gamer, and mostly because I can't afford spending $300+ dollars on ancient hardware solely dedicated to playing videogames, to play games at 720p with shitty textures, with many games dumbed down to accommodate the fact that your average controller only has 11 buttons.