Leave me alone PC gamers!

Recommended Videos

Caffeine_Bombed

New member
Feb 13, 2012
209
0
0
Meh. I play consoles because that's what I grew up on. First thing I owned was a Sega Master System.
And I still use my laptop for Broken Sword.
'Nuff said.
 

Tomeran

New member
Nov 17, 2011
156
0
0
Oh for the love of MOSES! This topic has been discussed and debated in more threads then gangnam style has views on youtube.

I'll stick with my previous replies to such threads: Stop putting gamers into categories of consoles and PC-gamers, and stop working on the assumption that because you meet arseholes on both sides that either sides are all twats.

Sure, the PC may have advantages but so does the console. They both have different strong-sides and trying to sit oneself firmly in one camp and argue against the other is just stupid. People enjoy different things. People should just deal with it.

And no, I dont think there is some sort of plot against you by PC-gamers, and if you honestly think that the "gaming community" is against you for just using a console, you're paying WAY too much attention to the occassional douchebag.
 

Plazmatic

New member
May 4, 2009
654
0
0
Spade Lead said:
Personally, until there is a way to get a 32+ inch HD screen to compress into a carryable size and weight, Console gaming is invincible. There will always be guys like me who think True HD on a 60" TV is better than Semi-HD gaming on a 17" Screen. (My laptop does 1080p, but if my graphics settings have to be reduced to prevent lag, I am not running true HD, am I?)

Besides, it was just two years ago that "PC Gaming was dying!"
I sincerely hope you are trolling, this is what gets people to call people who play on consoles idiots. Most games don't have the capability on the console to produce anything more than 720p hd due to the hardware. Turning down your graphics also does not turn down the pixelation unless you specifically reduce screen resolution in the game options menu, rather than turning down particle effects, AA, post processing etc, or the HZ that your monitor runs in. Also TVs are different and inferior (for games) to computer monitors in terms of latency (which is a HUGE deal in multiplayer games) and the amount of resolution you can get at max for one of them today (apposed to over 2000 by 1600 in Computer Monitor world) However computer monitors because of latency and quality to show text are more expensive and smaller (size).
 

antidark777

New member
Aug 12, 2009
50
0
0
Caffeine_Bombed said:
Meh. I play consoles because that's what I grew up on. First thing I owned was a Sega Master System.
And I still use my laptop for Broken Sword.
'Nuff said.
Exactly the same. I grew up on consoles, the first one being the Master system. I also use a pc for age of empires, as well as point and click games.
 

soes757

New member
Jan 24, 2011
204
0
0
VeneratedWulfen93 said:
I'd have to build one myself...which isn't gonna happen because I play 40k and that is ridiculously expensive.
Funny you say that because I stopped playing 40k to build my current machine, well, that and the (what fourth?)Marine codex.
Anyway
OT: I recently stopped using my playstation, not because it's a bad machine, or because the players are stupid....well the last one is debatable, any COD games have their share of stupid.
I just find it easier to use my pc, I can download all of my games, which is nice because biking six miles to gamestop is on my weekly to do list.

Now, on the subject of these people that believe they're the 'PC gaming master race' they're idiots, thinking they're better than someone because they like something else, right guys.
I like mountain dew, therefore I'm better than all of you non mountain dew drinkers.
 

MysticToast

New member
Jul 28, 2010
628
0
0
blackrave said:
MysticToast said:
Who are you and why aren't there more of you on this forum?
Aylaine said:
I can't be too sure why. From what I observed, some people are so into their preferences that they will use them as a weapon. Again I don't see the point. I'm of the mindset that you can be proud of your preferences within a varied medium, such as gaming, without conflict or disdain for the other aspects of that medium.

Do you feel similar? :)
I think you don't understand argument here
On the software level you are right, games are games, and we all are playing games not MS Excel spreadsheets.

It is the hardware level where things get messy (at least for me, maybe I am minority amongst PC gamers)
Because consoles are slavery
While slavers have done few magnificent things (Pyramids, Coliseum, etc.), I don't like slavery.
Similarly with consoles- few good things, have plenty of bad counterparts.
Want to modify your console? You aren't allowed, because you only borrowed it from MS/Sony/Nintendo.
That may be true, but if that's how you feel, then don't get a console. Some people just want to play games and that's it. I just don't get why others get so wrapped up telling them they made the "wrong" choice.

Gamers are divided enough as it is already, we don't need to keep adding fuel to that fire.
 

General Twinkletoes

Suppository of Wisdom
Jan 24, 2011
1,426
0
0
NameIsRobertPaulson said:
My PS3: $249, 2 years ago
My PC: $520, 2 1/2 years ago

My PC cannot run most AAA games these days. I know it can't run Skyrim, Crysis, or Battlefield. It runs Torchlight 2 though.

My PS3 has never given me any problems.

Just saying.
If you bought a PC for 520$, 2 years ago and it can't run Crysis or skyrim, it's because the PC was terrible and a bad deal. Before I upgraded a few months ago, I was using a 300 dollar crappy toshiba laptop from 2007 which was only average at the time, and it ran crysis fine. As it grew older it had problems with overheating all the time, but specs wise it was still more powerful than a console.
 

snekadid

Lord of the Salt
Mar 29, 2012
711
0
0
Well I'm alittle late to the game and i refuse to read 11 pages just to see if someones posted this so:

It wasn't as big a deal way back when PCs and consoles were different things. There were console games and there were PC games and it was fine, you played what suited your taste. However now the consoles are nothing but underpowered PCs with a ridiculous amount of restrictions on how you can use them. So theres really no point in playing consoles unless theres a franchise you really like and its exclusive.... of course my PCs better than any console so I guess you could run the disc on a emulator?

To be honest I have never ever seen PC gamers insulting console gamers except when a console gamer raises the flame flag by saying their console is the best thing ever and nothing can beat it, which is like
 

Buizel91

Autobot
Aug 25, 2008
5,265
0
0
Every PC i have owned lags/crashes when i try to play a game on a decent graphical setting, so i just gave up. I have never had a problem with my 360, no game lags, i don't have to keep upgrading it and every game i put in a game it works right off the bat without having to install it first.

I don't care if your PC can play Skyrim on it's highest graphical setting and i don't care if it runs better, we are all playing the same game it's just yours is more shiny. Now, that's not say Consoles are perfect, hell no, no system is, i just prefer console. (namely the 360 because the controller fits my hand perfectly)

If anyone says there is no problem with the PC, or the 360 is perfect in every single way, then that person is stupid. Every system has its pro's and con's, don't forget that :p

Now that that is out of the way, Halo Reach is calling me.
 

MysticToast

New member
Jul 28, 2010
628
0
0
Aylaine said:
MysticToast said:
Aylaine said:
I always felt that gamers should not be prejudiced against because of how they play their games. I think that only divides the gaming community as a whole. To me, a gamer is a gamer. Whether that's on a console, PC or a handheld. I personally don't understand the need to take offense with others on how they choose to play games either. :x
Who are you and why aren't there more of you on this forum?
I can't be too sure why. From what I observed, some people are so into their preferences that they will use them as a weapon. Again I don't see the point. I'm of the mindset that you can be proud of your preferences within a varied medium, such as gaming, without conflict or disdain for the other aspects of that medium.

Do you feel similar? :)
I do. Like I said in a previous post, gamers are divided enough already.
 

BenTheWolf

New member
Dec 21, 2009
27
0
0
The main argument for consoles over pcs is simple. If i buy an Xbox 360 game and place it in my Xbox 360 it will work. If I buy a PC game and put it in my mid range laptop it will not work on anything but low settings. The barrier to entry for PC gaming is that much higher. It's all very well talking about how it allows you to mod the game and make it better, but only a small percentage of people actually know how to do that. I'm reasonably tech savvy, certainly I'm the one in my house people come to when technology breaks, and I wouldn't have the foggiest how to do it.

Suggesting I should spend more money on a PC, where software conflicts etc could render any given game unplayable whilst having to wrestle with ridiculous services such as Steam to play (it only works when your internet is on, great if you live in a magical land where internet always works but I live in the UK :p) to access benefits such as a mouse and keyboard (which apart from rts games I've never enjoyed using more than a controller DESIGNED for gaming) or modding seems odd to me. Also I see virtually every week an article about hwo PC gamers get considerably worse versions of console games, or no ports at all and yet somehow they're better off?

Maybe this is all because I dislike Minecraft...

That said my Xbox has many annoying flaws. But the workable software library trumps all for me :)
 

RobfromtheGulag

New member
May 18, 2010
931
0
0
VeneratedWulfen93 said:
However the gap between consoles and PC gets bigger as time goes on and more people switch to PC gaming.
-
Yes I know the PC is the better platform
-The gap gets periodically reset when a new generation of consoles comes out. Though that didn't work out too well for the highest powered consoles of the past 2 generations (PS3/Xbox[not360])

-As you and your friends age, the convenience factor of a PC/Laptop over consoles grows. Hence the natural shift. Though perhaps not the biggest consumers of the console demographic, the youngsters are the ones who get the most use out of them.

-In an ideal world the PC would be the best platform. However with the increased tech knowledge to keep one running from game to game, it is far more often less than ideal.
 

Entitled

New member
Aug 27, 2012
1,254
0
0
BenTheWolf said:
The main argument for consoles over pcs is simple. If i buy an Xbox 360 game and place it in my Xbox 360 it will work. If I buy a PC game and put it in my mid range laptop it will not work on anything but low settings. The barrier to entry for PC gaming is that much higher.
That's such a flawed comparison! If you buy "a console game", and try to place it in your "console", it won't work. Yes, if you buy a game for the system with the right alphanumeric designation, it will work, but the overwhelming majority of Earth's population wouldn't know that either.

Yes, it's a barrier, but not being willing to step through it says more about you, than about the offering's quality.

Even if obtaining a gamer PC would be so complicated that only a few hundred people would be willing to do it, us not being able to follow them wouldn't be an argument for how that makes cosoles better. Just because the rules of chess are more complicated and harder to learn than the rules of tag, that doesn't make tag a superior game.

BenTheWolf said:
having to wrestle with ridiculous services such as Steam to play (it only works when your internet is on, great if you live in a magical land where internet always works but I live in the UK :p)
1. No, Steam is not always-online-DRM.
2. Most games have official releseas outside of Steam.
3. The rest have unofficial cracked versions outside of Steam

BenTheWolf said:
access benefits such as a mouse and keyboard (which apart from rts games I've never enjoyed using more than a controller DESIGNED for gaming)
Controllers aren't "designed for gaming". They are designed for directly controlling a humanoid or small vehicle character with the joystick around in a space, and attacking enemies.

For any genre demanding something else than that, such as most standard RTSes, Turn-based startegies, life simulators, old-school RPGs, sim/tycoon games, point-and-click adventures, roguelikes, MMORPGs, space simulators, MMO space simulator Tycoon RPGs, or submarine simulators.
 

SnowBurst

New member
Jul 2, 2012
276
0
0
GunsmithKitten said:
SnowBurst said:
GunsmithKitten said:
SnowBurst said:
why would anyone need a console
Because I can't afford the start up cost of a gaming PC.

But hey, I'll offer you the same challenge I give to any PC "master race" type;

Show me a PC build from the ground up, WITHOUT USING "MIDNIGHT MADNESS"-style SALES OR AUCTIONS THAT PROBABLY WON'T EVEN BE AROUND WHEN I TRY IT, that can run Sleeping Dogs on max settings with the HD patch at 50+fps for 200-300$ American, and I'll burn every console I own on Youtube. You up for that?
well my laptop right now is what $300 i think now n itll run sleeping dogs on high probably but if a laptop can do tht a desktop of the same price wud do it easily u can say consoles are cheaper all u wnat but thts false if u buy a dekstop for $1000 (im british so i dno american) itll last for about 2 or 3 console gens. u invest in a pc for longevity a console is a "hurr play now" thing a pc is a "ill pay a crap load now n enjoy it for years"
Uhhh, if that were the case, this clunker of a PC I have right now, which goes back to the PS2 days, would be able to run current gen games, and it can't.

Yes, the startup cost on a gaming PC is more expensive.
stop buying alienwares then
NameIsRobertPaulson said:
SnowBurst said:
GunsmithKitten said:
SnowBurst said:
why would anyone need a console
Because I can't afford the start up cost of a gaming PC.

But hey, I'll offer you the same challenge I give to any PC "master race" type;

Show me a PC build from the ground up, WITHOUT USING "MIDNIGHT MADNESS"-style SALES OR AUCTIONS THAT PROBABLY WON'T EVEN BE AROUND WHEN I TRY IT, that can run Sleeping Dogs on max settings with the HD patch at 50+fps for 200-300$ American, and I'll burn every console I own on Youtube. You up for that?
well my laptop right now is what $300 i think now n itll run sleeping dogs on high probably but if a laptop can do tht a desktop of the same price wud do it easily u can say consoles are cheaper all u wnat but thts false if u buy a dekstop for $1000 (im british so i dno american) itll last for about 2 or 3 console gens. u invest in a pc for longevity a console is a "hurr play now" thing a pc is a "ill pay a crap load now n enjoy it for years"
My PS3: $249, 2 years ago
My PC: $520, 2 1/2 years ago

My PC cannot run most AAA games these days. I know it can't run Skyrim, Crysis, or Battlefield. It runs Torchlight 2 though.

My PS3 has never given me any problems.

Just saying.
lawl $200 2 years ago fail ofc it wont then if its $200 now then it will stupidest thing ive heard, and psn got hacked like twice? nuff said. my laptop is 2 years old $300 now ish and can run all of them fine and runs crysis 1 n 2 on full (anti aliasing cripples most hardware anyway n isnt good on consoles so is irrelevant)
 

SnowBurst

New member
Jul 2, 2012
276
0
0
matthew_lane said:
GunsmithKitten said:
SnowBurst said:
why would anyone need a console
Because I can't afford the start up cost of a gaming PC.

But hey, I'll offer you the same challenge I give to any PC "master race" type;

Show me a PC build from the ground up, WITHOUT USING "MIDNIGHT MADNESS"-style SALES OR AUCTIONS THAT PROBABLY WON'T EVEN BE AROUND WHEN I TRY IT, that can run Sleeping Dogs on max settings with the HD patch at 50+fps for 200-300$ American, and I'll burn every console I own on Youtube. You up for that?
Two things

1. Why would you want to ever play "Sleeping Dogs"

2. Why would you want to play it on max graphic settings (60+ FPS). Max settings exist for people who want to spend the money to get the best in graphics technology. The fact is that consoles don't run in maximum graphics either (battefield 3 on console last year had only half the Frame rate of the PC version).
thats pretty much it tbh consoles play same games at half the graphics of pc versions so its a piece of rubbish for like £200 for a console tht runs the game on half graphics
 

SnowBurst

New member
Jul 2, 2012
276
0
0
NameIsRobertPaulson said:
SnowBurst said:
crazyrabbits said:
VeneratedWulfen93 said:
Every forum, site and such I visit advocates PC gaming and makes it seem like consoles are the reason for everything bad in the industry.
I have an issue of PC Gamer sitting here at home that I still remember reading through quite vividly when I bought it at a news stand in 2004. That issue had a "PC State of the Union" article, which detailed the common criticisms console gamers and the industry at large leveled against PC gamers, and how (and why) computer-based gaming was still thriving.

If PC players act like elitists, it's usually because most of the industry (for a time) turned their back on them. The times of barely-working, crippled PC ports became the norm instead of the exception, and developers were more apt to cut their losses on PC development and focus exclusively on console development. I've seen various interviews over the years where developers have made excuses that it isn't financially prudent to develop for consoles, that the technology isn't there...the usual excuses. Yet, we're finally getting back into a PC renaissance...the success of games like Alan Wake and the Elder Scrolls series, along with the rise of crowdfunding and the onrush of indie games, is making the PC the place to be. Not to mention the inherent advantages PC players have always had - mod support, unofficial patches and fixes, the ability to remove DRM via No-CD patches, in-game system console access, the ability to patch in cut content/on-disc DLC, mouselook and precise control, the ability to upgrade your system at any time, emulation, etc.

That doesn't excuse the behaviour certain PC gamers have displayed towards you, though.
i cant name very many console only AAA good titles halo springs to mind but thats about it and with steam its making PC gaming cripple console gaming i have a laptop for 2 years thtll play everything tht comes out now and i can use a 360 controller with it if i want and plug a hdmi cable in and put it to my tv no problem why would anyone need a console when they can get what i have for £300 boggles my mind i have all 3 consoles over the years and i only really play them for exclusives like halo and even then its starting to not be worth it
Assuming you only like shooters.

Disgaea 4
Bayonetta
Dead or Alive 5
Uncharted
God of War

Those are just off the top of my head.
uncharted is allright but definatley not worth buying a console for and the rest are just lol
 

SnowBurst

New member
Jul 2, 2012
276
0
0
simple fact is consoles play games at half graphics for half the amount of years a pc wud whoever buys a pc for anything less then £500 is an idiot