Meh. I play consoles because that's what I grew up on. First thing I owned was a Sega Master System.
And I still use my laptop for Broken Sword.
'Nuff said.
And I still use my laptop for Broken Sword.
'Nuff said.
I sincerely hope you are trolling, this is what gets people to call people who play on consoles idiots. Most games don't have the capability on the console to produce anything more than 720p hd due to the hardware. Turning down your graphics also does not turn down the pixelation unless you specifically reduce screen resolution in the game options menu, rather than turning down particle effects, AA, post processing etc, or the HZ that your monitor runs in. Also TVs are different and inferior (for games) to computer monitors in terms of latency (which is a HUGE deal in multiplayer games) and the amount of resolution you can get at max for one of them today (apposed to over 2000 by 1600 in Computer Monitor world) However computer monitors because of latency and quality to show text are more expensive and smaller (size).Spade Lead said:Personally, until there is a way to get a 32+ inch HD screen to compress into a carryable size and weight, Console gaming is invincible. There will always be guys like me who think True HD on a 60" TV is better than Semi-HD gaming on a 17" Screen. (My laptop does 1080p, but if my graphics settings have to be reduced to prevent lag, I am not running true HD, am I?)
Besides, it was just two years ago that "PC Gaming was dying!"
Exactly the same. I grew up on consoles, the first one being the Master system. I also use a pc for age of empires, as well as point and click games.Caffeine_Bombed said:Meh. I play consoles because that's what I grew up on. First thing I owned was a Sega Master System.
And I still use my laptop for Broken Sword.
'Nuff said.
Funny you say that because I stopped playing 40k to build my current machine, well, that and the (what fourth?)Marine codex.VeneratedWulfen93 said:I'd have to build one myself...which isn't gonna happen because I play 40k and that is ridiculously expensive.
That may be true, but if that's how you feel, then don't get a console. Some people just want to play games and that's it. I just don't get why others get so wrapped up telling them they made the "wrong" choice.blackrave said:MysticToast said:Who are you and why aren't there more of you on this forum?I think you don't understand argument hereAylaine said:I can't be too sure why. From what I observed, some people are so into their preferences that they will use them as a weapon. Again I don't see the point. I'm of the mindset that you can be proud of your preferences within a varied medium, such as gaming, without conflict or disdain for the other aspects of that medium.
Do you feel similar?![]()
On the software level you are right, games are games, and we all are playing games not MS Excel spreadsheets.
It is the hardware level where things get messy (at least for me, maybe I am minority amongst PC gamers)
Because consoles are slavery
While slavers have done few magnificent things (Pyramids, Coliseum, etc.), I don't like slavery.
Similarly with consoles- few good things, have plenty of bad counterparts.
Want to modify your console? You aren't allowed, because you only borrowed it from MS/Sony/Nintendo.
If you bought a PC for 520$, 2 years ago and it can't run Crysis or skyrim, it's because the PC was terrible and a bad deal. Before I upgraded a few months ago, I was using a 300 dollar crappy toshiba laptop from 2007 which was only average at the time, and it ran crysis fine. As it grew older it had problems with overheating all the time, but specs wise it was still more powerful than a console.NameIsRobertPaulson said:My PS3: $249, 2 years ago
My PC: $520, 2 1/2 years ago
My PC cannot run most AAA games these days. I know it can't run Skyrim, Crysis, or Battlefield. It runs Torchlight 2 though.
My PS3 has never given me any problems.
Just saying.
I do. Like I said in a previous post, gamers are divided enough already.Aylaine said:I can't be too sure why. From what I observed, some people are so into their preferences that they will use them as a weapon. Again I don't see the point. I'm of the mindset that you can be proud of your preferences within a varied medium, such as gaming, without conflict or disdain for the other aspects of that medium.MysticToast said:Who are you and why aren't there more of you on this forum?Aylaine said:I always felt that gamers should not be prejudiced against because of how they play their games. I think that only divides the gaming community as a whole. To me, a gamer is a gamer. Whether that's on a console, PC or a handheld. I personally don't understand the need to take offense with others on how they choose to play games either. :x
Do you feel similar?![]()
-The gap gets periodically reset when a new generation of consoles comes out. Though that didn't work out too well for the highest powered consoles of the past 2 generations (PS3/Xbox[not360])VeneratedWulfen93 said:However the gap between consoles and PC gets bigger as time goes on and more people switch to PC gaming.
-
Yes I know the PC is the better platform
That's such a flawed comparison! If you buy "a console game", and try to place it in your "console", it won't work. Yes, if you buy a game for the system with the right alphanumeric designation, it will work, but the overwhelming majority of Earth's population wouldn't know that either.BenTheWolf said:The main argument for consoles over pcs is simple. If i buy an Xbox 360 game and place it in my Xbox 360 it will work. If I buy a PC game and put it in my mid range laptop it will not work on anything but low settings. The barrier to entry for PC gaming is that much higher.
1. No, Steam is not always-online-DRM.BenTheWolf said:having to wrestle with ridiculous services such as Steam to play (it only works when your internet is on, great if you live in a magical land where internet always works but I live in the UK)
Controllers aren't "designed for gaming". They are designed for directly controlling a humanoid or small vehicle character with the joystick around in a space, and attacking enemies.BenTheWolf said:access benefits such as a mouse and keyboard (which apart from rts games I've never enjoyed using more than a controller DESIGNED for gaming)
stop buying alienwares thenGunsmithKitten said:Uhhh, if that were the case, this clunker of a PC I have right now, which goes back to the PS2 days, would be able to run current gen games, and it can't.SnowBurst said:well my laptop right now is what $300 i think now n itll run sleeping dogs on high probably but if a laptop can do tht a desktop of the same price wud do it easily u can say consoles are cheaper all u wnat but thts false if u buy a dekstop for $1000 (im british so i dno american) itll last for about 2 or 3 console gens. u invest in a pc for longevity a console is a "hurr play now" thing a pc is a "ill pay a crap load now n enjoy it for years"GunsmithKitten said:Because I can't afford the start up cost of a gaming PC.SnowBurst said:why would anyone need a console
But hey, I'll offer you the same challenge I give to any PC "master race" type;
Show me a PC build from the ground up, WITHOUT USING "MIDNIGHT MADNESS"-style SALES OR AUCTIONS THAT PROBABLY WON'T EVEN BE AROUND WHEN I TRY IT, that can run Sleeping Dogs on max settings with the HD patch at 50+fps for 200-300$ American, and I'll burn every console I own on Youtube. You up for that?
Yes, the startup cost on a gaming PC is more expensive.
lawl $200 2 years ago fail ofc it wont then if its $200 now then it will stupidest thing ive heard, and psn got hacked like twice? nuff said. my laptop is 2 years old $300 now ish and can run all of them fine and runs crysis 1 n 2 on full (anti aliasing cripples most hardware anyway n isnt good on consoles so is irrelevant)NameIsRobertPaulson said:My PS3: $249, 2 years agoSnowBurst said:well my laptop right now is what $300 i think now n itll run sleeping dogs on high probably but if a laptop can do tht a desktop of the same price wud do it easily u can say consoles are cheaper all u wnat but thts false if u buy a dekstop for $1000 (im british so i dno american) itll last for about 2 or 3 console gens. u invest in a pc for longevity a console is a "hurr play now" thing a pc is a "ill pay a crap load now n enjoy it for years"GunsmithKitten said:Because I can't afford the start up cost of a gaming PC.SnowBurst said:why would anyone need a console
But hey, I'll offer you the same challenge I give to any PC "master race" type;
Show me a PC build from the ground up, WITHOUT USING "MIDNIGHT MADNESS"-style SALES OR AUCTIONS THAT PROBABLY WON'T EVEN BE AROUND WHEN I TRY IT, that can run Sleeping Dogs on max settings with the HD patch at 50+fps for 200-300$ American, and I'll burn every console I own on Youtube. You up for that?
My PC: $520, 2 1/2 years ago
My PC cannot run most AAA games these days. I know it can't run Skyrim, Crysis, or Battlefield. It runs Torchlight 2 though.
My PS3 has never given me any problems.
Just saying.
thats pretty much it tbh consoles play same games at half the graphics of pc versions so its a piece of rubbish for like £200 for a console tht runs the game on half graphicsmatthew_lane said:Two thingsGunsmithKitten said:Because I can't afford the start up cost of a gaming PC.SnowBurst said:why would anyone need a console
But hey, I'll offer you the same challenge I give to any PC "master race" type;
Show me a PC build from the ground up, WITHOUT USING "MIDNIGHT MADNESS"-style SALES OR AUCTIONS THAT PROBABLY WON'T EVEN BE AROUND WHEN I TRY IT, that can run Sleeping Dogs on max settings with the HD patch at 50+fps for 200-300$ American, and I'll burn every console I own on Youtube. You up for that?
1. Why would you want to ever play "Sleeping Dogs"
2. Why would you want to play it on max graphic settings (60+ FPS). Max settings exist for people who want to spend the money to get the best in graphics technology. The fact is that consoles don't run in maximum graphics either (battefield 3 on console last year had only half the Frame rate of the PC version).
uncharted is allright but definatley not worth buying a console for and the rest are just lolNameIsRobertPaulson said:Assuming you only like shooters.SnowBurst said:i cant name very many console only AAA good titles halo springs to mind but thats about it and with steam its making PC gaming cripple console gaming i have a laptop for 2 years thtll play everything tht comes out now and i can use a 360 controller with it if i want and plug a hdmi cable in and put it to my tv no problem why would anyone need a console when they can get what i have for £300 boggles my mind i have all 3 consoles over the years and i only really play them for exclusives like halo and even then its starting to not be worth itcrazyrabbits said:I have an issue of PC Gamer sitting here at home that I still remember reading through quite vividly when I bought it at a news stand in 2004. That issue had a "PC State of the Union" article, which detailed the common criticisms console gamers and the industry at large leveled against PC gamers, and how (and why) computer-based gaming was still thriving.VeneratedWulfen93 said:Every forum, site and such I visit advocates PC gaming and makes it seem like consoles are the reason for everything bad in the industry.
If PC players act like elitists, it's usually because most of the industry (for a time) turned their back on them. The times of barely-working, crippled PC ports became the norm instead of the exception, and developers were more apt to cut their losses on PC development and focus exclusively on console development. I've seen various interviews over the years where developers have made excuses that it isn't financially prudent to develop for consoles, that the technology isn't there...the usual excuses. Yet, we're finally getting back into a PC renaissance...the success of games like Alan Wake and the Elder Scrolls series, along with the rise of crowdfunding and the onrush of indie games, is making the PC the place to be. Not to mention the inherent advantages PC players have always had - mod support, unofficial patches and fixes, the ability to remove DRM via No-CD patches, in-game system console access, the ability to patch in cut content/on-disc DLC, mouselook and precise control, the ability to upgrade your system at any time, emulation, etc.
That doesn't excuse the behaviour certain PC gamers have displayed towards you, though.
Disgaea 4
Bayonetta
Dead or Alive 5
Uncharted
God of War
Those are just off the top of my head.