What are you talking about? Braid? Remember all the deep and meaningful stuff done by crazies (Van Gogh)Indigo_Dingo post=9.69702.669296 said:This is free to be taken as fanboyism, but when something is described as deep and meaningful, but the person who developed it is more concerned about how much he's getting paid than its cultural impact, it sorta ruins it. Like, say, if George Lucas had compromised his third movie by just shoehorning in an entire race that made absolutely no sense at all, but was good for merchandising, and....what? What do you mean Ewoks? What? Moving on.
Its worse, they even had attack ads on TV (PC vs Mac and now Microsoft is joining in with Bill and Jerry)wordsmith post=9.69702.669310 said:You don't see the PC users bashing the Mac users to this extent, why should we have to watch you lot do it?
I find that more acceptable. It's the companies that should be doing the competing/ fighting/ (wuteva), not really the consumers (Not to this extent at least)shatnershaman post=9.69702.669318 said:Its worse, they even had attack ads on TV (PC vs Mac and now Microsoft is joining in with Bill and Jerry)wordsmith post=9.69702.669310 said:You don't see the PC users bashing the Mac users to this extent, why should we have to watch you lot do it?
So its a bad game because of that? I don't see how that affect the game itself.Indigo_Dingo post=9.69702.669327 said:Yes, I was talking about Braid.
And I didn't say craziness, I said that it really seems like it would ruin it if the guy was more concerned with getting paid than with getting his story out.
But you see PC vs Mac is not done on a Gaming site its done on tech sites and youtube videos of mac commercials.RIYA7A post=9.69702.669323 said:I find that more acceptable. It's the companies that should be doing the competing/ fighting/ (wuteva), not really the consumers (Not to this extent at least)shatnershaman post=9.69702.669318 said:Its worse, they even had attack ads on TV (PC vs Mac and now Microsoft is joining in with Bill and Jerry)wordsmith post=9.69702.669310 said:You don't see the PC users bashing the Mac users to this extent, why should we have to watch you lot do it?
Indigo_Dingo post=9.69702.668567 said:The only strength the 360 has are its exclusives and maybe price if people don't add up the costs. Those are the only reasons someone would pick it over the Ps3. No, seriously, what other sensible factors are there?
Well you obviously have a pc, so (unless the game needs vista) why dont you get the pc version?Bulletinmybrain post=9.69702.668089 said:No they are cheap bastards and are going to take their sweet time making console ports.imaroboturarobot post=9.69702.668071 said:ya it is no console could run it, my neighbor works for EA and he says it it really advanced and needs good hardware or what ever makes it not lag
http://creators.xna.com/Indigo_Dingo post=9.69702.669343 said:Or maybe, as I've already said, they were looking for something original, and the 360 doesn't have anything.
Or how I can't enjoy Ctrl-Alt-Del after finding out what a twat Tim Buckley is.Indigo_Dingo post=9.69702.669339 said:No, its sort of like....Ok, its like how listening to Metallica becomes worse after you learn what pricks Lars and Kirk are.
Apparently Fable 2 doesn't count. Oh right, because it won't live up to expectations and won't do anything new. Unlike Little Big Planet and Mirror's Edge, which will both be as totally great as the hype suggest. Because they're magic.Indigo_Dingo post=9.69702.669343 said:Or maybe, as I've already said, they were looking for something original, and the 360 doesn't have anything.
I assume by "something original" you mean something that isn't a sequel, and I suppose you're right on that front, the only non-sequel exclusive Xbox has coming out is Infinite Undiscovery, and going by Square Enix's recent track record, it won't be very good.Indigo_Dingo post=9.69702.669343 said:Or maybe, as I've already said, they were looking for something original, and the 360 doesn't have anything.Jobz post=9.69702.669336 said:Well I'm a 360 owner myself, but not at all a fanboy (The only reason I don't own a PS3 being that I can't afford one.) Anyway, onto to the original topic of this thread, which people seem to have forgotten about.
Yes the term "Best 360 Game" does imply that it should be an exclusive title, but maybe Mirror's Edge just looks better on the 360 than it does on the PS3. Now I know people will say that I'm wrong because the PS3 has better hardware, I've heard this all before, seen it happen countless times, but I can't see another reason for them to choose that as the best upcoming 360 game.
As for me, I'm trying to earn some money so I can get a PS3, dying to have Little Big Planet, Heavy Rain and whatever that super secret game is when they come out.
Dude Fallout 3 is so different from the other two because of the tech and the new FPS mode. Its a rehash of a series done in a new style. Kinda like Halo Wars.Jobz post=9.69702.669382 said:I assume by "something original" you mean something that isn't a sequel, and I suppose you're right on that front, the only non-sequel exclusive Xbox has coming out is Infinite Undiscovery, and going by Square Enix's recent track record, it won't be very good.
But I don't think sequels should be counted out of the running for best game of each console. Just because it's not something new doesn't mean it can't be great. I personally can't wait for Fable II and GOW2.
I won't pretend to know anything at all about Fallout 3 or the rest of the series, I've never played any of the games in it. As for Halo Wars I don't think it will be very good, I love RTS games but I don't think the Halo concept will work very well. But who knows, I could be pleasantly surprised.RIOT MAST3R post=9.69702.669399 said:Dude Fallout 3 is so different from the other two because of the tech and the new FPS mode. Its a rehash of a series done in a new style. Kinda like Halo Wars.Jobz post=9.69702.669382 said:I assume by "something original" you mean something that isn't a sequel, and I suppose you're right on that front, the only non-sequel exclusive Xbox has coming out is Infinite Undiscovery, and going by Square Enix's recent track record, it won't be very good.
But I don't think sequels should be counted out of the running for best game of each console. Just because it's not something new doesn't mean it can't be great. I personally can't wait for Fable II and GOW2.