Let's have a GENDER WAR!

Recommended Videos

Crazycat690

New member
Aug 31, 2009
677
0
0
Women would obviously win because any real gentlemen would not only not attack women, they would defend them, and since there are more women in the world and even kids can use guns all I can say is...

...I for one would welcome our new female overlords.
 

Biosophilogical

New member
Jul 8, 2009
3,264
0
0
Daystar Clarion said:
We can pee standing up.


You can't begin to comprehend just how jealous women are of that amazing ability.
I'm just going to put this out there, but gay guys would become our greatest resource. When the gender-pooh hits the proverbial ceiling fan, there is going to be a hetero-crippling lack of boobs. So guys would need to heavily rely upon the combat prowess of gay men, or surrender within a week to the booby-powers of the enemy.

OT: I think that there are two possibilities on the guy side. Either we'd become so lost in mob mentality that our competitive streak will boil over into all out war, which would probably result in prison-homosexuality (without females, there would be no real alternatives except other men, so while it wouldn't be true homosexuality, there'd still be a dramatic rise in man-on-man sexy-times[footnote]Meaning no, we would not realise that we were destroying the other half of the reproductive cycle, meaning yes, humanity would be doooooooomed[/footnote]), OR we'd mostly lose our motivation as the majority punctuates their every attempt at self-motivation with "But boobs"[footnote]For example; "We should burn their farms, blow up their factories and wipe them from this earth ... but boobs ..."[/footnote].

I'm not too sure about the girl side, you'd have to get a female to create an over-exaggerated depiction of the female mentality.
 

Ickorus

New member
Mar 9, 2009
2,887
0
0
Biosophilogical said:
Daystar Clarion said:
We can pee standing up.


You can't begin to comprehend just how jealous women are of that amazing ability.
I'm just going to put this out there, but gay guys would become our greatest resource. When the gender-pooh hits the proverbial ceiling fan, there is going to be a hetero-crippling lack of boobs. So guys would need to heavily rely upon the combat prowess of gay men, or surrender within a week to the booby-powers of the enemy.
Don't worry, we have many hidden stockpiles of porn around, we'll make it through this.
 

Carbonyl

New member
Jun 2, 2011
451
0
0
Naeras said:
Carbonyl said:
Thank you for reminding me to stop being serious! Oi, me, that was a close one.

I'll get back to work on my bra-based siege weapon designs.




Honestly though, I really take issue with women's magazines, they make me angry.
Thank you, now my computer screen and keyboard is full of coffee due to laughing.

Also women's magazines are stupid, and thankfully most women I know tend to agree on that. My girlfriend wondered how the writers of this shit hadn't been put in an asylum already, before (jokingly) claiming I was cheating because I was sitting weird.

I should also go back to working on my dumbbells with integrated hand grenades and boxing gloves, while I'm at it.

YOU WERE SITTING WEIRD? You are obviously not only cheating, but have devoured all of the many bastard children you have sired! That's what it says in my lady-dictionary, at the very least.


Now, back to the tampon bazooka prototype!
 

TheEvilGenius

New member
Apr 18, 2010
50
0
0
Well, I think men would win the the first battles, but women would win in the long run. You see, all of the men would become tremendous ass holes and therefore, the women would fall madly in love with us and thus become involved with us. Then, after the relationship is established, they would call upon the power of estrogen and clever use of what I call "Vaginal Ransom" to mind-game us into submission.

Wait... that's already happening!

 

Naeras

New member
Mar 1, 2011
989
0
0
Carbonyl said:
YOU WERE SITTING WEIRD? You are obviously not only cheating, but have devoured all of the many bastard children you have sired! That's what it says in my lady-dictionary, at the very least.


Now, back to the tampon bazooka prototype!
I didn't devour all of them. I merely sacrificed a few. Five or six, I can't remember. Most of them are still alive, they're hanging upside down in the closet.
proy3 said:
Well, I think men would win the the first battles, but women would win in the long run. You see, all of the men would become tremendous ass holes and therefore, the women would fall madly in love with us and thus become involved with us. Then, after the relationship is established, they would call upon the power of estrogen and clever use of what I call "Vaginal Ransom" to mind-game us into submission.

Wait... that's already happening!

http://i3.kym-cdn.com/entries/icons/original/000/004/077/Raisins_Face.jpg
Do your homework beforehand and make sure you become so good in bed the woman can't play the vaginal ransom card. If they'll lose more orgasms than you will on average, that plan will fail.
Other reasons that plan will fail is that as soon as everyone's an asshole, there won't be relationships. They'll just seduce the women, sleep with them once or twice and dump them while hurting their feelings and making them cut/suicide/eat so much ice cream they become fat and die of heart diseases. Either way, they lose. :V
(also women don't actually like assholes :V)
 

Marcus Kehoe

New member
Mar 18, 2011
758
0
0
Durgiun said:
Marcus Kehoe said:
If it was a real war it would be many year's.

In fighting men would ultimately win because they are naturally stronger and while woman with training may be an even fight an un-experienced man has advantage over an un-experienced woman on average.

But if it comes to a war that requires replenishment woman win, they only need a few men to impregnate many woman. So if 3 guys get captured that could be potentially hundreds of babies while with men if 3 woman get captured you got 3 babies.
Have you ever heard of cyanide tablets? And remote control bombs? And castration?
When you get to that stuff the gender line begin's to disappear. It doesn't matter who, anyone can push a button or shoot a gun, when it comes to that point it is a game of numbers.
 

Durgiun

New member
Dec 25, 2008
844
0
0
Marcus Kehoe said:
Durgiun said:
Marcus Kehoe said:
If it was a real war it would be many year's.

In fighting men would ultimately win because they are naturally stronger and while woman with training may be an even fight an un-experienced man has advantage over an un-experienced woman on average.

But if it comes to a war that requires replenishment woman win, they only need a few men to impregnate many woman. So if 3 guys get captured that could be potentially hundreds of babies while with men if 3 woman get captured you got 3 babies.
Have you ever heard of cyanide tablets? And remote control bombs? And castration?
When you get to that stuff the gender line begin's to disappear. It doesn't matter who, anyone can push a button or shoot a gun, when it comes to that point it is a game of numbers.
And women would have more of them. As I remember, I heard something about some people creating sperm out of bone marrow from a male and a female. So women would have tha advantage. But the superior numbers would bolster the ego and the the men would have to fight guerilla style.
 

D Moness

Left the building
Sep 16, 2010
1,146
0
0
Dan Steele said:
This is going to turn into "macross do you remember love" isn't it?
At least we aren't bred for war like the Zentradi and the Meltrandi.
 

GryffinDarkBreed

New member
Jul 21, 2008
99
0
0
Call me when women are deployed to frontline combat, made to enlist in the draft, and are charged almost twice as much for car insurance, and aren't favored in child custody hearings.

Until then, men aren't on equal social standing to women.
 

CODE-D

New member
Feb 6, 2011
1,966
0
0
So like actual war right, no inhibitions, no holds bar, no sympathy, no wishing to fuck the other, no care for future society just pure warring hatred and indifference?

Men of course.

Are you kidding? We would fucking murder and slaughter you all I mean c'mon are you joking.
Youd probably get a good 2/5 of us but c'mon seriously its not even a debate really.
Men are monsters in human clothing is all I can say.
 

Marcus Kehoe

New member
Mar 18, 2011
758
0
0
Durgiun said:
Marcus Kehoe said:
Durgiun said:
Marcus Kehoe said:
If it was a real war it would be many year's.

In fighting men would ultimately win because they are naturally stronger and while woman with training may be an even fight an un-experienced man has advantage over an un-experienced woman on average.

But if it comes to a war that requires replenishment woman win, they only need a few men to impregnate many woman. So if 3 guys get captured that could be potentially hundreds of babies while with men if 3 woman get captured you got 3 babies.
Have you ever heard of cyanide tablets? And remote control bombs? And castration?
When you get to that stuff the gender line begin's to disappear. It doesn't matter who, anyone can push a button or shoot a gun, when it comes to that point it is a game of numbers.
And women would have more of them. As I remember, I heard something about some people creating sperm out of bone marrow from a male and a female. So women would have tha advantage. But the superior numbers would bolster the ego and the the men would have to fight guerilla style.
But usually when it comes to fighting guerrilla style your on the defensive. Now if woman where to get the advantage they could keep it if they don't have to worry about men advancing. Then their bolster of numbers would only get bigger as the men have to sit on their thumbs.

So likely unless men where to turn the tide of the war to their side quickly in the beginning woman would again likely win.
 

Durgiun

New member
Dec 25, 2008
844
0
0
Marcus Kehoe said:
Durgiun said:
Marcus Kehoe said:
Durgiun said:
Marcus Kehoe said:
If it was a real war it would be many year's.

In fighting men would ultimately win because they are naturally stronger and while woman with training may be an even fight an un-experienced man has advantage over an un-experienced woman on average.

But if it comes to a war that requires replenishment woman win, they only need a few men to impregnate many woman. So if 3 guys get captured that could be potentially hundreds of babies while with men if 3 woman get captured you got 3 babies.
Have you ever heard of cyanide tablets? And remote control bombs? And castration?
When you get to that stuff the gender line begin's to disappear. It doesn't matter who, anyone can push a button or shoot a gun, when it comes to that point it is a game of numbers.
And women would have more of them. As I remember, I heard something about some people creating sperm out of bone marrow from a male and a female. So women would have tha advantage. But the superior numbers would bolster the ego and the the men would have to fight guerilla style.
But usually when it comes to fighting guerrilla style your on the defensive. Now if woman where to get the advantage they could keep it if they don't have to worry about men advancing. Then their bolster of numbers would only get bigger as the men have to sit on their thumbs.

So likely unless men where to turn the tide of the war to their side quickly in the beginning woman would again likely win.
Hm. We would also have to take into account the various women that might not want to part with their male children ('cause the marrow-sperm will bring about either or gender, and taking into account the maternal instincts), so there might be a chance for spies. The more feminine men would survive and thrive and be potential allies for the men.

Shit, this is too much fun.
 

Freechoice

New member
Dec 6, 2010
1,019
0
0
When speaking about replenishing numbers, none of you seem to remember that it takes 18 years to reach adulthood in most parts of the world. Even if you dropped it to, say, 15, it would still be 16 years to raise said child into a fully mature combatant. World War II didn't last a third of that (if you're Amurikan) and that was with the standard rifle being a bolt action.

Besides, what mother would let her children do that so young?
 

KeyMaster45

Gone Gonzo
Jun 16, 2008
2,846
0
0
A Gender war you say?

Fire all jockstrap cannons and raise the cootie shields!! We shall not fall to their frilly girlyness!!
 

DevilWithaHalo

New member
Mar 22, 2011
625
0
0
Women have the advantage in replenishing numbers? Hardly. They're going to kill off 1/2 of their children because they're men and the remaining females will be raised with no strong male influence. Their combat prowess will be weaksauce and their loins will burn when they encounter our rugged manliness.

Even if they didn't kill of their male offspring, they will be raised as pansies. Clearly more interested in tea time than taking the life of a fellow man. Bunch of mommas boys!

Plus we can just take prisoners of war and keep our numbers up that way.
 

Marcus Kehoe

New member
Mar 18, 2011
758
0
0
Durgiun said:
Marcus Kehoe said:
Durgiun said:
Marcus Kehoe said:
Durgiun said:
Marcus Kehoe said:
If it was a real war it would be many year's.

In fighting men would ultimately win because they are naturally stronger and while woman with training may be an even fight an un-experienced man has advantage over an un-experienced woman on average.

But if it comes to a war that requires replenishment woman win, they only need a few men to impregnate many woman. So if 3 guys get captured that could be potentially hundreds of babies while with men if 3 woman get captured you got 3 babies.
Have you ever heard of cyanide tablets? And remote control bombs? And castration?
When you get to that stuff the gender line begin's to disappear. It doesn't matter who, anyone can push a button or shoot a gun, when it comes to that point it is a game of numbers.
And women would have more of them. As I remember, I heard something about some people creating sperm out of bone marrow from a male and a female. So women would have tha advantage. But the superior numbers would bolster the ego and the the men would have to fight guerilla style.
But usually when it comes to fighting guerrilla style your on the defensive. Now if woman where to get the advantage they could keep it if they don't have to worry about men advancing. Then their bolster of numbers would only get bigger as the men have to sit on their thumbs.

So likely unless men where to turn the tide of the war to their side quickly in the beginning woman would again likely win.
Hm. We would also have to take into account the various women that might not want to part with their male children ('cause the marrow-sperm will bring about either or gender, and taking into account the maternal instincts), so there might be a chance for spies. The more feminine men would survive and thrive and be potential allies for the men.

Shit, this is too much fun.
But they would keep the children. The point of the war is not to wipe the other out but to rule them.

Again the marrow thing is not needed is one man can impregnate hundreds of woman in mere months. hell don't even need sex just milk them and you can farm sperm.
 

iLazy

New member
Aug 6, 2011
279
0
0
I don't know about physically beating you, but I'm pretty sure women will leave you with some emotional scars. You may win the war gentlemen, but years of therapy will never fix you... MUAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!