Thaius said:
The problem with both the helmet and seat belt laws is that the only person at risk is the one not wearing one of the aforementioned equipment.
There's a lot of way you can hurt someone else by not wearing a seatbelt. If you're the driver, you can cause additional damage by losing control of the vehicle. This can harm yourself, passengers, people in other vehicles, and pedestrians.
If you're in the front seat, you can be launched through the windshield and act as a human missile. This can damage other cars or even injure the occupants, or harm pedestrians.
Even in the back seat you can injure other passengers.
So the idea that it's only you at risk is utter bull.
Physics. She's a hard taskmaster.
Further, and you may disagree with the tenet of emergency services, but as long as my taxpayer dollars are going to keep some idiot's ass alive after he cracks his skull on the pavement, it does impact me and every other taxpayer.
Now, if not wearing a helmet came with an inherent waiver that EMS got to leave your ass by the side of the road, I'd be onboard with the whole "personal responsibility" / "not hurting anyone but yourself" line.