I like you. I'm only 17, and I have no clue as to how I might attain a hunting license, a weapon to hunt with and lessons with that weapon, let alone if I could afford it, but when I'm older, I will probably take you up on that. I currently eat meat and you are right, if the time comes and I can't bring myself to end an animal life, then I'll give up sentient meat (I've caught fish before, and I don't think they are all that bright/self-aware, so in terms of how much their life is worth, it ain't much).Glass Joe the Champ said:-snip-
Not to rain on your parade, but I actually want to be computer savvy enough to do this one day. As for building a house, I personally think it sounds interesting and wouldn't be adverse to that. The planet one's going to be hard though...Necromancer Jim said:You live in a house, you should build one at least once.
You use a computer, you should assemble one at least once.
You live on a planet. You should ascend to godhood and create one. At least once.
It's much easier to kill something when it doesn't have a cute face.Argol228 said:It's a proven fact that no meat shrinks the brain. so I never take stock in what vegans say. their brains aren't working to standards.
Also what makes killing an animal different to killing a plant? they are both living things and plants are still alive when you are munching on them.
It's certainly required, but it's instructive. My only point is that it's good to know how things are done. I don't think it should be required by law, but I definitely think it's a good thing to do, yes. I think you might have misunderstood my "should" as some kind of forceful statement. It's more along the lines of "people should read the ingredient list when they buy food". Not a moral imperative or anything, just a good idea in my opinion.Bags159 said:If I drive my car, should I have to go to a car manufacturing company?
When I use gas, should I go to an oil refinery?
Etc.
Stupid argument is stupid.
My point is requiring people to know how everything they use is made is a waste of time and to only force one product to be understood is hypocritical.Avistew said:It's certainly required, but it's instructive. My only point is that it's good to know how things are done. I don't think it should be required by law, but I definitely think it's a good thing to do, yes. I think you might have misunderstood my "should" as some kind of forceful statement. It's more along the lines of "people should read the ingredient list when they buy food". Not a moral imperative or anything, just a good idea in my opinion.Bags159 said:If I drive my car, should I have to go to a car manufacturing company?
When I use gas, should I go to an oil refinery?
Etc.
Stupid argument is stupid.