Metal Gear and the Xbox 360...what's the big deal?

Recommended Videos

Yog Sothoth

Elite Member
Dec 6, 2008
1,037
0
41
jboking said:
I thought that image was about the new metal gear acid game on the iphone, why do people think it means its coming to the 360? more on topic, people get pissed off because mgs has been a long time sony excluive, so its kind of shocking to the fanboys to see it branching out.
no, it hasn't... MGS2: sons of liberty was ported to xbox1...
 

songnar

Modulator
Oct 26, 2008
229
0
0
I guess I'll be the one to point this out...

Metal Gear has already been tried on the X-Box console. MGS2, anyone? It was an epic failure. Kojima Productions, unlike many dev teams, tends to learn form past mistakes. It is unlikely that they will try an x-box release of Metal Gear again.

*edit* right. Yog beat me to it by about 2 seconds. Well done and spot on. (though it was, in fact MGS2: Sons of Liberty and not MGS3: Snake Eater which was ported.
 

Hey Joe

New member
Dec 23, 2007
2,025
0
0
It's just a ideological thing.

You see, gamers tend to defend one console in a display of tribalism that is quite sad. When a game that belong exclusively to one tribe begins to appear in another, the natives flip their shit out.

Gamers without a warped sense of community belonging to their console will see this as a good thing. The more platforms a game is on, the more potential for profit which will lead to bigger budgets in the future and better production quality on the next game.
 

ShyWinter

New member
Apr 25, 2008
245
0
0
Onmi said:
shatnershaman said:
ShyWinter, what possessed you to think this would end well?
End well? it started bad, he did insult PS3 owners right in the first post

My only guess it that these loudmouth cretins are trying pathetically to justify a $500 console over a $300 one.
See?
I was insulting loudmouth cretins...just when I was starting to believe that the PS3 attracted a "mature" fan base.
 

Librarian Mike

New member
May 16, 2008
625
0
0
songnar said:
I guess I'll be the one to point this out...

Metal Gear has already been tried on the X-Box console. MGS2, anyone? It was an epic failure. Kojima Productions, unlike many dev teams, tends to learn form past mistakes. It is unlikely that they will try an x-box release of Metal Gear again.

*edit* right. Yog beat me to it by about 2 seconds. Well done and spot on. (though it was, in fact MGS2: Sons of Liberty and not MGS3: Snake Eater which was ported.
...and of course, they ported Metal Gear Solid to the Gamecube. Granted, that was a while ago but I'm pretty sure the world didn't end.
 

Joeshie

New member
Oct 9, 2007
844
0
0
Onmi said:
White Knight Chronicles, inFamous, The Ratchet and Clank series, FFXIII Versus.
There is more but I honestly can't be to arsed to go check.

It's for two reasons.

360 fanboy's don't particularly care for Metal Gear, they just want some sort of proof that the PS3 is inferior and will die, because that's what Fanboys are like they WANT hardworking people to lose their jobs.

PS3 Fanboys (And regular fans can fit in this themselves) Get pissed because said 360 fans sound like whiny immature little bitches.

Here's an Analogy, the PS3 is a Rich kid and the 360 is a Poor one, now the Rich kid already gave the poor kid some toys, but the poor kid want's ALL of the rich kids toys and doesn't want to share any of his, so he cries. A lot. and it is rather annoying.

a lot of 360 whingers I have heard have said something along the lines of 'Oh but a PS3 is to expensive' 'I don't want to shell out money for the console but I want the game' and other stuff.

Look their are 360 games I want, okay two I want Star Ocean 4 and Tales of Vesperia, the Latter probably going to follow the Tales Of Trend of being released as a Multi-Platform later. but the thing is I personally don't own a 360, but I'm not going to ***** for those games.

Either Pay the money and get what you want or shut up in my opinion, the incessant bitching can be quite annoying as you can guess.

Also XIII is only turning in the west, a move that has the actual employee's pissed off. and Versus is still an exclusive.

No console is bad, thats the simple truth of the matter, yet 90% of the community is pure Concentrated FAN HATERS!

And since EVERYONE knows how much I love TVtropes.org
Oh man. I love how you rag on 360 fanboys and turn out to be a bitter PS3 fanboy yourself.

Your butthurt is so delicious.
 

Eldritch Warlord

New member
Jun 6, 2008
2,901
0
0
songnar said:
I guess I'll be the one to point this out...

Metal Gear has already been tried on the X-Box console. MGS2, anyone? It was an epic failure. Kojima Productions, unlike many dev teams, tends to learn form past mistakes. It is unlikely that they will try an x-box release of Metal Gear again.
Going from PS2 to Xbox is pretty much the opposite of going from PS3 to 360.
 

sma_warrior

New member
Jan 23, 2008
129
0
0
Can someone tell me how this means 360?

What, cause it's in green? This can't just be Metal Gear Acid 3?

And for anyone who says that circle symbol looks like the 360 ring (of death), guess what, I see and touch that symbol every single time I turn on my PS3...
 

Syphonz

New member
Aug 22, 2008
1,255
0
0
Metal gear to 360? Okay, as a fanboy of the series, I can say this: Don't half ass it!
 

songnar

Modulator
Oct 26, 2008
229
0
0
Syphonz said:
Metal gear to 360? Okay, as a fanboy of the series, I can say this: Don't half ass it!
Y'know, I think I'm going to second that. The consoles are a secondary thing. If MGS4 had come out on the 360 instead of the PS3, I'd own a 360. If you're going to take the best series in the world and try to put it on the X-Box console, it had better darned well be done right.
 

Yog Sothoth

Elite Member
Dec 6, 2008
1,037
0
41
sma_warrior said:
*edit* right. Yog beat me to it by about 2 seconds. Well done and spot on. (though it was, in fact MGS2: Sons of Liberty and not MGS3: Snake Eater which was ported.
thanks, i caught it... had the right sub-title, but wrong number...

sma_warrior said:
Can someone tell me how this means 360?

What, cause it's in green? This can't just be Metal Gear Acid 3?

And for anyone who says that circle symbol looks like the 360 ring (of death), guess what, I see and touch that symbol every single time I turn on my PS3...
it doesn't. period... just more dreaming from xbox fanboys... i think it almost certainly indicates a new MG:AC!D, possibly for the i-phone or the DSi...
 

Joeshie

New member
Oct 9, 2007
844
0
0
I think you are all forgetting that while most electronics do in fact have the power-up icon, none of them are really associated with it the way the 360 is to it's power up lights. (Largely thanks to the RRoD).
 

songnar

Modulator
Oct 26, 2008
229
0
0
I'll add a few more cents to the pool of thoughts here.

I'd like to address the question in the title "What's the big deal?"
The big deal is that this is METAL GEAR we're talking about. A game which has been alive longer than me and which has been incredibly successful. Metal Gear was a game which changed the way that people looked at stealth in games, in fact, it can be called the first successful stealth game if we dismiss the original Wolfenstein which I suspect we can. That, my friend, is the big deal. This is real gaming history in the works.
 

ShyWinter

New member
Apr 25, 2008
245
0
0
songnar said:
I'll add a few more cents to the pool of thoughts here.

I'd like to address the question in the title "What's the big deal?"
The big deal is that this is METAL GEAR we're talking about. A game which has been alive longer than me and which has been incredibly successful. Metal Gear was a game which changed the way that people looked at stealth in games, in fact, it can be called the first successful stealth game if we dismiss the original Wolfenstein which I suspect we can. That, my friend, is the big deal. This is real gaming history in the works.
That makes sense. Like, seeing a James Bond movie with a different guy as 007, right? Or hearing that the Supreme Court is about to overturn an earlier precedent, something like that?
 

DanRSL

New member
May 14, 2008
22
0
0
Although in general multiplatform releases are a good thing, exclusives are what truly keep the industry going. Imagine if there were no exclusives, then quickly one of two competing hypothetical consoles would not sell because their hardware became apparent as the lesser of the two. Since there is no difference in software, the obvious choice would die off, and most likely pretty quickly.

Then with no opponent, creativity and competition will stifle. This is exactly why monopolies are very bad, and exclusives are very good. In fact this is happening with the Wii right now. The Wii has no competitor on its level, and poor games by any Joe Schmo developer have flooded into the Wii's library.

Additionally, timed exclusives are also a bad thing. MGS4, and other PS3 exclusives, have sold PS3s without question. For many people, the only reason they bought a PS3 could very realistically have been to play only one or two exclusive games. If within the life cycle of that console, its exclusives go multiplatform, then you have been duped into making a poor investment (if exclusives were an important part of your decision, which they generally are).

In that sense, PS3 owners have a very justifiable complaint when previously exclusive games go multiplatform, because they could have (and maybe would have) waited and bought it for another console for whatever reason (cost, hardware preference, space saving, etc). No one is offering a refund for a PS3 if MGS4 goes to the 360, and if a business announces that this will never happen, but then it DOES - this bad business will likely kill consumer confidence and act as the industry shooting itself in the foot by creating a consumer culture of mistrust and deal hunting. Consumers then won't believe in your company or product, and will only buy it once you have lost so much money on them that they sell for rock bottom prices. Not out of "fanboyism" or spite, but because they've been taught that their traditional consumer culture is dated and unrewarded.
 

Joeshie

New member
Oct 9, 2007
844
0
0
DanRSL said:
Although in general multiplatform releases are a good thing, exclusives are what truly keep the industry going. Imagine if there were no exclusives, then quickly one of two competing hypothetical consoles would not sell because their hardware became apparent as the lesser of the two. Since there is no difference in software, the obvious choice would die off, and most likely pretty quickly.
No, it just means that a console would be judged on other factors, such as online services and first-party titles released. I can imagine that if exclusive third-party titles fall apart, then Nintendo, Microsoft, and Sony will have to really up their efforts on first-party titles.