Metroid represents everything wrong about our treatment of the enviornment.

Recommended Videos

Internet Kraken

Animalia Mollusca Cephalopada
Mar 18, 2009
6,915
0
0
The Metroid series has been going on for years, and has earned a special place in the hearts of many gamers. I myself have played many of them, and enjoyed them quite a bit. However, something has always bothered me about the series for years. There is an inherent problem with the Metroid series, and I have only just now realized what it is; the Metroid games represent everything wrong about our society's attitude towards the environment.

You may be wondering how I came to such a conclusion. After all, what does a bounty hunter blowing up space pirates have to do with our treatment of the environment? Far more than you might think. Consider this; how many animals does Samus regularly slaughter during her various campaigns? She single-handedly eradicates entire colonies of animals. She uses her various weapons to destroy their homes. She completley alters her surroundings to accomplish her current task, not even once thinking about the long term impacts of her actions. Detonating a thermonuclear device to breach a shield? Sure that's fine, couldn't possibly cause any problems down the road. Samus has done massive damage to countless numbers of species and planets, and may have even wiped out some rare ones completely. Samus shows no concern over the potential impact this could have on numerous fragile ecosystems.

And this is only looking at the little picture; consider for a moment what the objective of many of Samus's missions entail. Often times her goal is to wipe out an entire species. Why? Because these species pose a "threat" to humanity, even when they are incapable of space travel. Or she needs one species to fix her ship, so she commits genocide in their name (Metroid Prime: Echoes). The game doesn't even attempt to address the moral issues surrounding the extinction of an entire species in the name progress, let alone because her ship is busted. Suddenly the actions of Samus are a lot more horrifying. For every planet she "saves", she usually wipes out a whole species and does irreparable damage to the planets ecosystem in the process.

As if this wasn't bad enough, the games even suggest that this careless and unwarranted destruction is a good thing. The climax of Metroid: Fusion involves Samus throwing a space station out of orbit and into the planet below. Why? To wipe out the unique species that has evolved on the station, of course. Genocide seems to be her strong suit. Not only is she killing off yet another species, but she is destroying all of the environmental research and progress that the station has accomplished in the process. On top of all this, the impact of the station when it crashes into the planet below will no doubt cause massive destruction. This is an environmental nightmare, so the Galactic Federation rightly attempts to arrest Samus for her crimes. But the game suggests that her insane actions are somehow justified. That she is doing the right thing, even though she is causing destruction on an immense scale.

I'm not trying to suggest that Nintendo and Retro are run by Saturday morning cartoon villains that burn down trees for the sake of being evil, but they clearly didn't consider the message their games are sending. Samus's complete disregard for the preservation of the environment shows just how little our own society cares about our own environment. The Metroid series actively promotes the destruction of countless species and ecosystems for any reason, no matter how poorly justified it is, because most people don't consider this to be an issue. These games reflect a dark, undeniable truth about the current state of our society. There is no doubt that soon we shall be traveling through space, discovering new worlds and species. But Metroid is influencing us to greet these new species with a missile launcher to the face.
_________________________________________________________________________________

If you're reading this, then that means you have actually bothered to read the 5 paragraphs listed above. Or you just skipped to the end. I wouldn't blame you for doing so, since everything above this is nothing but vapid drivel. Anyone who has played the Metroid games noticed that I am clearly over-analyzing it, searching for hidden messages in places were none exist. And by carefully omitting important details about the series, I was able to better support the ridiculous claims I made.

The point of this was to show that you can claim there is a hidden meaning behind anything when you over-analyze it and omit the details that would ruin your assertion. It's quite easy to make any game, book, or movie look bad when you examine them in such a fashion. Obviously I'm taking a jab at the subject of Movie Bob's new series, in which he did the exact same thing with the Halo series and hidden racism. The difference being that I made this as a joke, while he was being dead serious. However, both are just as meaningless when you stop selectively excluding various details.

Try it for yourself; over-analyze one of your favorite games and try and make a convincing argument about some ridiculous message it supposedly promotes. See what hilariously wrong statements you can come up with. Also, this thread might serve another purpose; pointing out how many Escapists don't bother to read an entire topic before commenting.
 

TaboriHK

New member
Sep 15, 2008
811
0
0
I have to contest this. In Super Metroid I totally rescued the animals that taught me how to wall jump and hyper run.
 

Internet Kraken

Animalia Mollusca Cephalopada
Mar 18, 2009
6,915
0
0
SomethingAmazing said:
You've played the Prime games right? Well, her entire mission was to prevent the spread of a toxic chemical from infecting the environment. This chemical happens to be extremely useful and provides bountiful amounts of energy.
Of course. That's just one the details I omitted to make my argument more convincing. As a result, simply playing most of the games causes my argument to fall apart.


Okay, Metroid 2: The Return of Samus was a piece of crap that says that it is okay to eradicate an entire species. After all, it's not like there are any creatures that it keeps in check or anything...


Wait, there really wasn't any justification for killing the metroids in the second game? I kind of assumed there was. Weird. Still, thinking that this has any reflection upon our treatment of other species in real life is pretty silly.
 

Quaidis

New member
Jun 1, 2008
1,416
0
0
If anything, I think Samus's need to wipe out entire species has to do with saving planets. It's kind of like the Cane Toad in Australia or the Asian Carp in the United States. The Metroid creatures were introduced due to a lack of care when disinfecting ships from planet-to-planet and were harming each planet's natural ecosystem already from being generally hazardous and invasive. Samus is just systematically removing the menace to save not only humanity, but the other creatures on the planet from being wiped out from this alien menace.



Mind you, you could still question the methods she uses, but I'm sure that either the type of planet's living bio-environment could support thermo-nuclear explosions or that the thermo-nuclear explosions she uses are so advanced in technology of bio-weapons that it stays in a remote area or self-dissipates.



So yeah. Don't think of it as Samus committing speciecide for the good of mankind, think of it as Samus being ordered to go out on clean-up duty to save Australia from a viscous brain-sucking, acid-spitting cane toad. Or something like that. =P
 

Bloodstain

New member
Jun 20, 2009
1,625
0
0
The three paragraphs under the line made me so very happy you weren't serious.
And you're right. You can interpret anything in anything if you just try hard enough.
 

Taneer

New member
Sep 1, 2008
179
0
0
People arguing about the Metroid series are just proving this person's point even more.

I see exactly what you're getting at, and thank god someone sees how common this is done. It's one of the most common ways for video games to be denounced, and hopefully it will make people think a bit more.
 

Johnnyallstar

New member
Feb 22, 2009
2,928
0
0
So, you're angry that it promotes survival of the fittest while having humans the fittest to survive?
 

Irridium

Ā 
Apr 28, 2008
14,634
0
0
I must say, that was actually pretty hilarious.
And very true. About the over-analyzing part, not the Samus kills environments part.

And I find it equally hilarious that people seem to be completely missing the point of your post.
 

Irridium

Ā 
Apr 28, 2008
14,634
0
0
Johnnyallstar said:
So, you're angry that it promotes survival of the fittest while having humans the fittest to survive?
No, he's angry that people over-analyze things. Read the whole post please.
 

Internet Kraken

Animalia Mollusca Cephalopada
Mar 18, 2009
6,915
0
0
Johnnyallstar said:
So, you're angry that it promotes survival of the fittest while having humans the fittest to survive?
Ignoring the fact that the first part of the OP was a joke, I'm still wondering what point you were trying to make here. I never once brought up survival of the fittest in that post. I was "complaining" about the Metroid series lack of concern over the preservation of the environment. Survival of the fittest has nothing to do with that.
 

Sanctus Hospes

New member
Sep 18, 2009
105
0
0
I'm also going to have to agree with the arguments against you. I appreciate you actually submitting your points with ideal spelling and grammar, but Samus fights monsters (animals) to keep the ratings low to sell to the little kiddies.
 

Drakmeire

Elite Member
Jun 27, 2009
2,590
0
41
Country
United States
Samus doesn't want to kill all the creatures, she has no choice they attack her first and by the end of the game the villain blows up the planet. she saved the last Metroid at the end of return of samus, proving that she cares about creatures as long as they don't want to eat her. then again it's a game and shooting things is fun.
 

Internet Kraken

Animalia Mollusca Cephalopada
Mar 18, 2009
6,915
0
0
Sanctus Hospes said:
I'm also going to have to agree with the arguments against you. I appreciate you actually submitting your points with ideal spelling and grammar, but Samus fights monsters (animals) to keep the ratings low to sell to the little kiddies.
Drakmeire said:
Samus doesn't want to kill all the creatures, she has no choice they attack her first and by the end of the game the villain blows up the planet. she saved the last Metroid at the end of return of samus, proving that she cares about creatures as long as they don't want to eat her. then again it's a game and shooting things is fun.

I really didn't think people would still be missing the point at this time. You'd think that if someone didn't read the entire OP, they would at least look at the end of it.
 

d3structor

New member
Jul 28, 2009
222
0
0
Didn't moviebob also say that he was over analyzing halo and that he doesn't believe that bungie are trying to send out that message?
 

Hira

New member
Oct 17, 2010
39
0
0
Damn.
Brilliant.
Post.

There's two things I love about this. One: How you managed to make a five paragraph post about this and managed to make it sound intelligent all the way, and two: How right you are about people complaining about things they haven't bothered reading through entirely, as proven by several comments made before this one.

Brilliant. ^^
 

JoJo

and the Amazing Technicolour Dream Goat 🐐
Moderator
Legacy
Mar 31, 2010
7,170
143
68
Country
šŸ‡¬šŸ‡§
Gender
♂
I really lol'd at this, well done for the whole making-a-point-about-overanalysing thing, I love how your Metroid "argument" actually sounded well-thought out and serious =D
 

Eicha

New member
Oct 7, 2009
168
0
0
Ha, sounds like Samus is 100% bona-fide American. Destroying things they get in the way for the sake of "the good of humanity."

On topic, I do agree. You can look for the 'secret messages' in ANYTHING. That's why I hated all English classes in high school.