I did. I was asking a question about the first part of the post. Ironic you post about me not answering the main point, while not even addressing my point. So, as you say, read the whole post.Irridium said:No, he's angry that people over-analyze things. Read the whole post please.Johnnyallstar said:So, you're angry that it promotes survival of the fittest while having humans the fittest to survive?
Well, even if it's a joke, lets dissect this. You didn't need to state "survival of the fittest" in words, but if you look deeper into it, you can find that there is a shade of Darwinism behind what you said, but it's obscure. I latched onto it because I find it funny in it's own way.Internet Kraken said:Ignoring the fact that the first part of the OP was a joke, I'm still wondering what point you were trying to make here. I never once brought up survival of the fittest in that post. I was "complaining" about the Metroid series lack of concern over the preservation of the environment. Survival of the fittest has nothing to do with that.
Humans are natural animals, and as such, we act according to our nature. If it's in our nature to butcher every critter we see and wipe out whole alien races, are we not acting out a form of natural selection? A piece of mandated Darwinism? True we are reasoning animals, but our ability to reason is part of our nature. If, then, we reason that an individual race of creatures must be eradicated for our own good, are we not acting as the hand of natural selection, and doing so within our nature?
My point is, if humans are eradicating individual species, it is a form of natural selection, because we reach our reasoning naturally, and then it comes down to survival of the fittest as to the species' ability to survive. True, humans may have an "unfair advantage" in eradicating animals, but that is because we have developed ourselves to be the fittest. It irks me that some people (e.g. radical environmentalists) think that humans are somewhat unnatural because of how we live, and that we are not doing what is their definition of "natural."