Johnnyallstar said:So, you're angry that it promotes survival of the fittest while having humans the fittest to survive?
Ironic wouldn't you say?
<youtube=WY_amJ0YZrM>
Johnnyallstar said:So, you're angry that it promotes survival of the fittest while having humans the fittest to survive?
Most people (and I've been guilty of this myself) feel they can get the gist of an article with 3 of 5, or 4 of 5 paragraphs read. This is something you need to expect if you are going to put your work online to be read. Also using the last third of your post to change the nature of the first two is poor writing, inefficient and ignores the practical use of the thesis.Internet Kraken said:I don't expect people to read the whole thing. However, I do expect that if you're going to make a reply, you would read the whole thing. If someone doesn't feel like reading a long post, that's perfectly understandable. What I don't understand is why someone would bother responding if they don;t even want to read the entire post.Sanctus Hospes said:Dude, it's the Internet. Personally I feel it's a bit naive to post this much written word online and expect people to read every single bit. This is a forum; it is to opinions what hookers are to sailors. My recommendation is to put your intention at the beginning if you want people to get what you are doing.Internet Kraken said:I really didn't think people would still be missing the point at this time. You'd think that if someone didn't read the entire OP, they would at least look at the end of it.
Otherwise, keep putting at the end and pretending to be smarter or making a point no one is really going to get behind (that people don't read it all).
And I'm not pretending to be smarter than anyone. If you got that impression, I apologize. Most people around my age on this site are probably smarter than me anyways.
The point of changing the subject of the paper in the last few paragraphs is meant to further reinforce my point. If I just announced from the start that everything I was saying was a joke and was not meant to be taken seriously, it might influence people's opinion. I wanted people to think the first part was serious.Sanctus Hospes said:Most people (and I've been guilty of this myself) feel they can get the gist of an article with 3 of 5, or 4 of 5 paragraphs read. This is something you need to expect if you are going to put your work online to be read. Also using the last third of your post to change the nature of the first two is poor writing, inefficient and ignores the practical use of the thesis.
This is kind of off-topic, but I'm pretty sure the plot in Black and White, at least from what I've heard, is actually about this. The generic villain group this time is a bunch of Pokemon abolitionists who think that Pokemon shouldn't be used to battle. Or something like that.Souplex said:I would over-analyze Pokeymanns by saying it promotes animal abuse, but that's the entire crux of the game.
I think it's because there's so much to take in that people forget what they were going to post and drift off to do another thingInternet Kraken said:EDIT: Do people just run away from anything more than 3 paragraphs long? Number of views seems really high considering how many responses this has.
Of course there is room for flexibility, but part of what makes a good writer is realizing how effective it will or won't be BEFORE making it public. In this case, it was naive of you to think it would actually work and (unfortunately) it just made you sound like a know-it-all.Internet Kraken said:The point of changing the subject of the paper in the last few paragraphs is meant to further reinforce my point. If I just announced from the start that everything I was saying was a joke and was not meant to be taken seriously, it might influence people's opinion. I wanted people to think the first part was serious.
You don't have to do everything by the book when it comes to writing. There is room for flexibility.