Nwabudike Morgan said:
TheDrunkNinja said:
Nwabudike Morgan said:
TheDrunkNinja said:
that prefers to think of their consumers as herds of sheep, easily duped into giving them even more of their money.
You just described, like, every company.
Not really. Either way, the "herds of sheep" thing was just to add some spice to my spot-on accusations of "barely-legal" and "near-monopoly" business practices.
So, what do you play games on that is made by a company that doesn't see you solely as a source of income?
Ahem.
Barely-legal and
near-monopoly business practices.
Microsoft has been skirting above the law for years now. Any idiot can understand that a company that makes profit is just doing it's job. What it
should not do is screw over everybody else in the process. This is why monopolies are
illegal. In order for the economy to thrive, there needs to be a difference between an accounting profit and the normal profit in a company in order to keep everything in check, and the prevention of barriers and heterogeneous products, which
encourages a one seller market, helps keep everything regulated. Microsoft, on the other hand, does
not hold these ideals in high regard and, therefore, acts as it will in this matter, resulting in the manipulation of the marginal revenue which segregates a section of the profits in the price and quantity relationship. The result is, Microsoft=$$ and a near-monopoly is created.