So would I, I'd love going around to all the various destroyed landmarks.JediMB said:Personally I'd love to play a game that took place in a post-apocalyptic (or just plain apocalyptic) version of my home town.
So would I, I'd love going around to all the various destroyed landmarks.JediMB said:Personally I'd love to play a game that took place in a post-apocalyptic (or just plain apocalyptic) version of my home town.
Wait, what? Are you saying the developers are sick because they never depict America getting blown up? (something which happens quite a lot in entertainment media) Or is this sarcasm? (maybe I'm dumb)DVSAurion said:And no form of entertainment has never ever blown up American cities at all. I am stunned by the sickness of the developers. They must have serious issues with their life for playing and developing video games.
Is it just me, or if that argument were made by the MAKER of the game, it would be a positive? I mean, that seems a lot more compelling. It's why Fallout 3 (which was made after 9/11 and showed and discribed not only a nuclear weapon exploding over the white house, but the result of 250 years of detritus and debris after an apocalyptic war in washrington DC) was so good"In the upcoming Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2... the gallant mansion reduced to rubble doesn't belong to some crazed separatist dictator hellbent on all kinds of nefarious acts. Instead, it's the White House," he wrote. "The scenes of post-apocalyptic scenes of carnage play out not in some fictional town in eastern Europe, but in Washington D.C. itself."
Thank you Dan Brown. How about something relevant to the topic now that you did not just learn from Angels and Demons?gRiM_rEaPeRsco said:"Christian Science Monitor"?? not too long ago christians murdered hundreds of scientists most of who were devout christians.