Mom microwaves child; Another kills child over broken TV

[GiglameshSoulEater]

Simple solution: shoot them.

Cheap and cheerful (for everyone lese, at least).

 

[Madara XIII]

I am going to hell for this.

Spoiler

Did he taste good?

I am so sorry.

GYAHAHAHAHAHA XD
I might as well go to hell laughing...

~New Children's Hot Pockets~

And before any jackass starts judging me then read below.

"You lot who preach restraint and watch your waist as well, Should learn, for once, the way the world is run"
- Tom Waits

So there. Bite me. I'm just one of the few who can find humor in how fucked up the world is.

 

[Madara XIII]

Simple solution: shoot them.

Cheap and cheerful (for everyone lese, at least).

Indeed. Makes me wonder why we waste so much money on deathrow. :/ I'm not being sarcastic btw. I'm really wondering. Hell even spending money on Ammo is more economically sound.

Don't shoot it up their arm. Shoot it in their head.

That'll get the message across. Kind of a catchy slogan as well.

 

[GiglameshSoulEater]

Simple solution: shoot them.

Cheap and cheerful (for everyone lese, at least).

Indeed. Makes me wonder why we waste so much money on deathrow. :/ I'm not being sarcastic btw. I'm really wondering. Hell even spending money on Ammo is more economically sound.

Don't shoot it up their arm. Shoot it in their head.

That'll get the message across. Kind of a catchy slogan as well.

I'm glad someone agrees with my 'shoot them' option.

Maybe for illegal drug users as well (depending on the drug).

Shoot up: get shot.

 

[Raykuza]

Any moron can have a kid. This kind of reminds me of the movie Idiocracy wherein the main character lands in a dystopian future where everyone is mentally retarded. It got that way because while all the intelligent people were using contraception and waiting for the right time in their lives to have 2.5 kids, all the rednecks and dumbasses etc etc were FUCKING LIKE RABBITS and having 12 kids each. The population eventually tended towards the idiots.

 

[WOPR]

How can you be charged for both murder and manslaughter? someone explain.

The same way you get charged with "Assault" and "Battery"
they're very close in definition to one another
but they're not the EXACT same thing
so you get both slammed on you

Actually they are pretty different. Murder and manslaughter both invlove killing somebody, but with assault and battery one is physical and the other is not.

Nevertheless, she knew she did something wrong and sadly it ended in the worse possible way. Punish her by example!

As for the first case, I'm interested in knowing why she did it. Is it wrong that I hate that they are questioning her mental condition? I hear that far too much.

Ya I know what you mean, I think a microwaved baby would be a real pain in the ass to clean up. Anybody who willingly causes that kind of mess knowing they are going to have to clean it up has got to be insane.

I know and I apologize I was REALLY tired when I replied with that

the reason they get charged with that (the real reason) is because in court they just charge you with EVERYTHING they can that remotely fit the case in question, then leave it to the jury to decide which is best fitting to the case (or something like that)



Off note: anyone else experienceing Keyboard lag on this site while using firefox? I'm not joking I'll be typing along and then it'll freeze up for like 3-4 seconds and not type anything

it's not delaying the typing it's just out and out dieing
and it's ONLY on this site for me T^T

 

[Kadoodle]

Sorry, I can't help but screaming, "WHERE IS YOUR GOD NOW?"

 

[DanDeFool]

Kang Ya, a 29-year-old from Sacramento, has been taken into custody for what police are saying were fatal burns administered to her 6-week-old daughter, via microwave. Happy nightmaring.

Happy nightmaring indeed, this is exactly why I don't watch the news and try to lock myself out of any news from any media. Crap like these stories, and this: http://bit.ly/lsMOE8 make me wish there was a way that people had to register and pass some form of test to have children, sort of like how you need a pass to have a child in china. don't flame me on this, I'm not commenting on whether China's one-child system or its consequences are yay or naye, merely commenting on how the registration to have a child clearly in some manner is possible to do, and should be done o'er here, because quite frankly some people do not have the right to have children

The problem is, who determines the qualifications for being a parent? How possibly corrupt would anyone in that position become?

It's a good question, but frankly it's a problem we might just have to figure out how to overcome.

And whenever I hear stories like this, I just have to sit down for a second and repeat to myself, "Still not as bad as the middle ages--Still not as bad as the middle ages--Still not as bad as the middle ages", like a 13th century Dorothy, visiting Oz after a stay in the Vatican's dungeon.

 

[Sovvolf]

Ho God... Thanks for that... now I can't unread it. That just what I want to read today, some psycho microwaves her kid... God that's awful.. I don't even have words that can describe how much of tone shift I've just had after reading that. How unnervingly pissed off I am about it. That's one things I cannot, cannot stand. People harming children, hell I'd stand side by side with a serial rapist if the other side was someone who'd do serious damage to a child.

Now I'm not in a good mood. What makes it worse is that I know they'll be someone posting in this thread soon if they haven't already probably either defending their actions or chastising us because "What makes kids so special". .. I'm putting the kettle on... need cheering up and a cup-o-tea might be the best thing for it.

 

[James Joseph Emerald]

Kang Ya, a 29-year-old from Sacramento, has been taken into custody for what police are saying were fatal burns administered to her 6-week-old daughter, via microwave. Happy nightmaring.

http://gizmodo.com/5814366/woman-arrested-for-microwaving-her-baby-to-death

It's interesting how it goes:
"Investigation report: injuries consistent with microwave burns"
"Mom accused of microwaving child"
"Mom arrested for microwaving child"
"Mom microwaves child"

All from the same source. It's like that Chinese whispers game except, y'know, somebody's life is prematurely ruined.

Haven't you heard the expression "trial by media"?

Are you trying to imply that she -didn't- microwave the kid?

I'm implying that as the original article states: "nobody knows what happened in that house except for the woman and her baby".
And I think assuming someone is guilty just because an article says they might be is a pretty ignant attitude to take.

All I have to say is the baby sure as hell didn't microwave itself.

According to the article, they don't even know if the baby was microwaved, just that its burns were consistent with the burns of other microwave victims in three other cases (which is hardly a big sample size).

I'm not trying to defend the woman or anything, she probably did microwave the kid, but the point is you can't state it as fact until it actually is a fact. I mean, you'd probably be the first person to attack FOX News for doing the exact same thing.

 

[KingsGambit_v1legacy]

How can you be charged for both murder and manslaughter? someone explain.

That was my first question too. Surely it's one or the other. It's presumably manslaughter which is for causing death unintentionally. Murder implies intent to kill.

Tragic stuff. :-(

 

[James Joseph Emerald]

Kang Ya, a 29-year-old from Sacramento, has been taken into custody for what police are saying were fatal burns administered to her 6-week-old daughter, via microwave. Happy nightmaring.

http://gizmodo.com/5814366/woman-arrested-for-microwaving-her-baby-to-death

It's interesting how it goes:
"Investigation report: injuries consistent with microwave burns"
"Mom accused of microwaving child"
"Mom arrested for microwaving child"
"Mom microwaves child"

All from the same source. It's like that Chinese whispers game except, y'know, somebody's life is prematurely ruined.

Haven't you heard the expression "trial by media"?

Are you trying to imply that she -didn't- microwave the kid?

I'm implying that as the original article states: "nobody knows what happened in that house except for the woman and her baby".
And I think assuming someone is guilty just because an article says they might be is a pretty ignant attitude to take.

All I have to say is the baby sure as hell didn't microwave itself.

According to the article, they don't even know if the baby was microwaved, just that its burns were consistent with the burns of other microwave victims in three other cases (which is hardly a big sample size).

I'm not trying to defend the woman or anything, she probably did microwave the kid, but the point is you can't state it as fact until it actually is a fact. I mean, you'd probably be the first person to attack FOX News for doing the exact same thing.

 

[7777777777444]

Jesus... Well, now my Global Faith Has Dropped to Negitive 70...

Seriously though, what the hell? Why are people so sadistic/ Fucking Insane?! It just depresses me...

 

[silasbufu]

You just have to look at that picture of the mom to see she's mentally ill. I'm sorry some kids just don't stand a chance.

 

[PureIrony]

Y'know, I'm starting to think maybe we should regulate who gets to breed. If you don't test as completely sane, you get your womb confiscated or something like that.

 

[freaper]

People like this makes me lose faith in humanity.

Quotes like this make me lose faith in humanity...But then I remember we're not all that bad, and I move on with my life.

OT: Haven't read the article, I want to spare myself the details, but those are some cruel ways to die for a child.

 

[Char-Nobyl]

Both horrific, though there's an obvious reason behind both of them. If you want to drive a car, you first need to prove that you can actually drive. If you want to own a gun, you need to first prove that you're neither an ex-con or deranged. If you want to be a parent...all you need are the right parts to produce one, and it's assumed that you're fit to raise a human being.

This also explains why we don't let gay couples adopt in all states: genitals are clearly indicative of a person's ability to be a parent.

 

[SonofaJohannes]

Why is the world like this?

 

[Char-Nobyl]

Y'know, I'm starting to think maybe we should regulate who gets to breed. If you don't test as completely sane, you get your womb confiscated or something like that.

In that vein, I suggest we take the Starship Troopers route: if you want to conceive, you get a license to prove that you can at least probably qualified to raise a child. Base it on things like mental health history, criminal records (or lack thereof), or other gamebreaking factors, then move on to more flexible terms, like your existing number of children (meaning no more backwoods retards churning out a dozen kids when they don't even have the means to adequately support two), and state of employment/income. Protip, prospective parents: if you don't have the money to raise a child, don't have a child.

Enforcement is simple: first birth or two without prior authorization, and if found to be lacking in qualifications, will simply result in the confiscation of the child by social services. To make sure that doesn't leave us inundated with parentless children, subsequent offenses will simply be treated with mandatory sterilization or jail time.

Cold? Yeah. Oppressive? Possibly. But will it cut down on the number of tragedies like these two? Definitely.

 

[GrimHeaper]

Crazy doesnt have an age limit.

But it definately looks like its increasing as the generations come down....

Going back to the days of the Greeks we are and I somehow have to laugh at how the Wii indirectly caused a death despite it being so wrong. I mean... a Wii guys.