Moral Question for you

Recommended Videos

JJMUG

New member
Jan 23, 2010
308
0
0
Albany or New York City. With Albany maybe i can get senators who do nothing but give all the states money to that parasite of a City New York. So Buffalo can finally work again.
 
Feb 4, 2010
116
0
0
Wha...What? Why would they need me to press the button? They're obviously fucking with me. I figure I'm screwed no matter what I do so I'm gonna spit in their face in any way I can on my way out.
 

Teh Roflchoppa

New member
Jun 24, 2009
108
0
0
The simplest answer: A family of four is nowhere near worth destruction of a city and some more around it, and even if you hit an empty place, problems will arise, radiation doesn't just dissipate, plus the country's place you hit will get pissed and they might start a war... You all have questionable ethics...
 

SPCF

New member
Jun 9, 2010
639
0
0
zombiejoe said:
Ok, this is a hard one.

Let's say a terrorist group kidnaps you, and knocks you out. When you wake up, there is a computer in front of you, with a map of the world. The terrorists demand that you pick a city on the map to drop a nuke on, or they will kill you and your family. Would you drop the nuke? If so, where? And would you take the bullet to the head instead of killing the others.

EDIT: I just got a call from the imaginary terrorists, they said they promise not to fire a nuke if you let them kill you and your family.
Doesn't it not really matter, since the terrorists are going to blow up a city anyway? I mean that's kinda what they do...
Alos, is there any reason to trust a terrorist? XD
With that reasoning, I`d probably blow something up somewhere :/

Edit: the guy above me had a much better answer :)
 

Ironwampa

New member
Dec 7, 2009
177
0
0
Would it matter what city I picked? It's not like they can actually 'DROP' a nuke on anything save their own feet. They don't have the resources to fly over a city and drop a nuke on it. But, if I had to choose, I'd go with Chicago just for the hell of it.
 

Shoggoth2588

New member
Aug 31, 2009
10,250
0
0
I would take the bullet but, the terrorists would likely just drop the nuke anyway. I don't see why they would mess around like that. Also, they would likely edit the tape to make it look like I nuked [insert city name here]
 

Blatherscythe

New member
Oct 14, 2009
2,217
0
0
They'll just kill me and family anyways, then drop the nuke. I'd pick a spot in the middle of nowhere to drop their bomb, then take a bullet in the head with a smile on my face, knowing that I delt them one hell of a blow by wasting one nuclear bomb of theirs in a lifeless wastland. Yes there is nuclear fallout, but they didn't destroy a city and release just as much fallout. So it's the lesser of two evils, nuclear weapons have some serious after effects.
 

garlicncow

New member
May 6, 2010
200
0
0
San Fransisco or DC, why? I don't like either place and one is full of people who piss me off more than anyone else.
 

Balzmann

New member
Dec 17, 2009
3
0
0
fuck can we pick more then one..... if not these terrorists are cheap as hell and they should ashamed of themselves. bad terrorists bad......
 

RetroViruses

New member
Aug 7, 2008
142
0
0
Easy, I'd drop the nuke. Hell, if I was in a bad enough mood, I'd ask if they had any more nukes: there are too many people on this planet. But I'd go for a big city in Texas or the south, or maybe some poor African country where people are in constant pain anyway.