More school, yay or nay?

Recommended Videos

Aqualung

New member
Mar 11, 2009
2,946
0
0
Rutawitz said:
Aqualung said:
Rutawitz said:
Aqualung said:
Rutawitz said:
thats the dumbest idea i ever heard
Well, maybe if you went to school more, your spelling would improve. Just a thought.
ooo grammer. dont be too picky
Oh, I'm not being picky. I'm just mildly miffed that you're killing my native language. That's all.

Were English a person, she would lie weakly in a hospital bed, cursing the ailments that plagued her with wonderful words unbeknownst to you.
if you had a high horse youd ride it all the time
It's a better advantage than sitting, rooted ignorantly on the ground.
 

Shapsters

New member
Dec 16, 2008
6,079
0
0
I think they should have classes for idiots that are at school for socializing, and classes for people hat actually want o do work. One class explains well and lets you do you work, the other lets you dick around like 80% of people in high-school want to do.
 

Jinx_Dragon

New member
Jan 19, 2009
1,274
0
0
poncho14 said:
Why don't they just increase the quality of the teaching?
Seconded, or whatever it is up to now. Simply put, if you don't have quality schooling then being forced to endure more of it is NOT going to improve the problem what so ever.
 

Aqualung

New member
Mar 11, 2009
2,946
0
0
Rutawitz said:
Aqualung said:
Rutawitz said:
Aqualung said:
Rutawitz said:
Aqualung said:
Rutawitz said:
thats the dumbest idea i ever heard
Well, maybe if you went to school more, your spelling would improve. Just a thought.
ooo grammer. dont be too picky
Oh, I'm not being picky. I'm just mildly miffed that you're killing my native language. That's all.

Were English a person, she would lie weakly in a hospital bed, cursing the ailments that plagued her with wonderful words unbeknownst to you.
if you had a high horse youd ride it all the time
It's a better advantage than sitting, rooted ignorantly on the ground.
so because i happen to accidentally spell something wrong on an online forum, it makes me stupid and ignorant? its a fucking forum. who gives a shit
Well, I'm going to move myself and my 'high horse' onto higher ground and stray away from your needless flaming. I'm only suggesting that you strive to better yourself and embrace such a beautiful language, which generations upon generations of people, from Shakespeare to even Tolkien, have so wonderfully mastered. Maybe while you do so, you could adjust your temper, as well. As you said- "It's a 'fucking' forum." No need to be angry.

Apologies to the thread creator for straying so far from the road.
 

Jinx_Dragon

New member
Jan 19, 2009
1,274
0
0
Rutawitz said:
so because i happen to accidentally spell something wrong on an online forum, it makes me stupid and ignorant? its a fucking forum. who gives a shit
You know what I can't help but feel... the irony! English is a bastardised language after all. Yet here is someone complaining that we are not 'using the proper spelling and grammar.' English ripped off several languages, and butchered the sentence structure something horrid as any Gallic derived speaker will happily point out, and now we are meant to be all upset cause something isn't spelt just right or someone uses a different format then what 'masters of the tongue' would of used.
 

Sosakitty

New member
Aug 12, 2008
544
0
0
I will be quite upset if any part of this bill passes, as will I be upset if any of the plans posed by anyone that has posted on this thread are somehow put into effect. Why should I have to suffer because the majority of students in the USA don't put forth the same effort that my fellow gifted students and I do? It's not fair.

Maybe it's because I get my education at this school [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suncoast_High_School], but a lot of the plans put forward by the people that have posted on this thread would not have the desired effect on me. I don't need better teachers. The cream of the crop teaches at my school. It was the same in middle school because all of the best teachers taught the Advanced classes (the ones I was in). I haven't had to deal with a bad teacher since elementary school. My classes are already an hour and thirty minutes each. I already have to get up at 5:30 and usually don't return until twelve hours later. I already apply myself enough that I actually learn in my classes, get good grades, and will probably be headed off to university in the near future. I definitely don't need to be punished because of the lack of willingness to learn of other students in the country. I am going to continue to abuse italics for dramatic effect. I would happily join my classmates in protest of these education reforms being put into effect.
 

VicunaBlue

New member
Feb 8, 2009
684
0
0
LyonLee said:
There is something that hasn't been mentioned before in this forum: not increasing the school hours, but increasing the school calendar.
Currently, the American school system is based upon an agrarian calendar, summer vacation is long, so kids can go help their parents work on the farm. However, this creates a big blank hole in the educational development of children. Studies have shown that kids lose about 2-4 months worth of education over the two-month summer vacation. If this time was shortened considerably, say to three weeks, they would lose far less then they currently are.

I say: increase class hours so that each class is about 1h 30m, instead of 45m, which is about average, and increase the length of a break-time between classes, instead of 5 minutes to rush from one class to the next, give them 15 minutes to actually decompress a little, then get to their next class. Also: make the summer vacation shorter, and all other vacations longer. 2 weeks during the winter, 2 weeks during the spring, and 3 weeks during the summer.

Also, I hate to say this, but increase the amount of homework. It sounds cruel, but practice really does make perfect. Every kid probably spends about 2 hours doing homework, and spends the rest of the time zonking out in front of the TV. Make it 3-4 hours, and really let the assignment sink in. This way, lessons do not have to be repeated ad nauseum.

The biggest problem is that people are saying we should teach better, not increase hours, but in reality learning is a 24 hour experience. A kid receiving 45 minutes of history isn't going to learn very much, and the half-hour of homework isn't going to help matters. A large problem with this is that most of school is rote memorization, of course it's boring, whereas college should be more about learning how to research.

People here are right, sometimes it's the teacher that makes a difference, and I couldn't agree more. My best teachers were the ones who made their subject interesting, who spoke about them with excitement and odd facts that help draw in their students. Unfortunately, not only has there been a dirth of accredited teachers entering the system, but the system itself has failed to correct itself on countless occasions, advising the removal of schools and teachers that do the worst, when, very likely, these are the ones who need the most help. The creation of pass/fail programs, rewarding the best and punishing the worst has only exacerbated the problem, forcing teachers to hammer into their students only the questions that will be on the test, rather than actually teaching them.
Going by your plan, I would be at school 15-17 hours a day, added the 3-4 hours of homework, and about an hour in the morning, plus 30 minute bus ride each way, I'm getting 2-4 hours of sleep a night. The voices wouldn't like that.
 

ReincarnatedFTP

New member
Jun 13, 2009
779
0
0
I remember in my Frnech II class Junior Year studying the way the French did their schooling.

IIRC, they had shorter year-round breaks instead of an agrarian Summer break cycle, and the same amount of hours but later in the day.

I like that system alot better.

Also, the public school system in Alabama is a joke, and IMO honors is where standard should be and the AP classes are at about the right level.

Extracurricular activities is what kills, not the classes.
When every college is hounding you because they want a list of ten thousand clubs on your resume, or they need to see "leadership skills" and you try to juggle three clubs with your schoolwork plus having a social life/or personal time it destroys your time management so you move to energy drinks and not getting enough sleep.
These are probably the same people who are going to abuse Adderral and Dex so they can get through college.
 

Supreme Unleaded

New member
Aug 3, 2009
2,291
0
0
We don't need more hours we need better teachers ans have to kill half the population of dumbasses. That would solve all of our problems.[sup]and you know im right[/sup]

O.T. Acually in my school we WANT more hours. The reason is because we want a study hall and a "recess" (spelling? i havent spelled that word in like 10 years) of sorts. You know a time to go out side and talk to friends.

Plus with the study hall we wouldnt have homework, so its a win/win. This would only add like an hour to our day as well.
 

hxcfreak

New member
Feb 7, 2009
149
0
0
High School in South Georgia operates on two schedules period and block. In period scheduling you generally have 45 minutes in 6 classes I think. In block scheduling you generally have 4 classes that are 90 minutes long. My school uses block and at some point in the 90 minutes the whole class shuts of and goofs around. Adding more time is pointless to me.
 

ccdistancerunner

New member
Sep 11, 2008
191
0
0
Problems I've run into from my experience in public schools.
1) Students who aren't learning at the same pace as everyone else are pushed along if they are ready or not, thanks to the No Child Left Behind Act.
2) Items learned are repeated, repeatedly(yes I know that's bad English, but it stresses the point). Learning the same thing like it's brand new to the students every year is both dumb and unnecessary. That's why the school systems should have classes that go back to basics for those who need it, not for all.
3)Most school systems are top heavy. Administrators make 100-150 thousand dollars a year. Teachers make maybe 35 in my area. Too many administrators mean more secretaries eating up the budget gotten from the tax payers that should go to finding qualified candidates for teaching positions. On top of that the administrators don't listen to the children or their parents about the needs of each individual. You're supposed to be an individual an easily herd-able flock, which is never the case with a true individual. Schedules are supposed to give "basics" and in that, classes that people have a hard time relating to (such as history or math) are forced on them at a level which they can or do not want to learn on.
4)Classes are boring, most of the time not relating to skills actually needed in today's world, using information that most people don't want to know, or even preparing people for post-secondary education. In no school is it told to you that life will kick you repeatedly until you have had enough and decide to do something about it, ie. nothing is handed to you.
5) Students have no incentives anymore to do well in school. College for most is something that's too far away to grasp for middle school age kids, who learn to do nothing and get by. By the time high school comes around they no longer apply themselves to anything. Parents are also to blame, as most don't give a flying fuck about their kids (shown by decreasing numbers at school open house), as long as they are happy.
 

MelziGurl

New member
Jan 16, 2009
1,096
0
0
hxcfreak said:
High School in South Georgia operates on two schedules period and block. In period scheduling you generally have 45 minutes in 6 classes I think. In block scheduling you generally have 4 classes that are 90 minutes long. My school uses block and at some point in the 90 minutes the whole class shuts of and goofs around. Adding more time is pointless to me.
Our high school had 7 x 35 min classes when I started in grade 8. By grade nine, they changed it to 5 x 1hr classes which was alot better. You learnt nothing in 35mins, whereas in 1hr the teachers could cover more ground in their lessons. Mind you, in Australia not many schools have a locker system which means carrying every text book for each lesson in your bag on your back, shoulder etc. I liked longer classes.
 

Clashero

New member
Aug 15, 2008
2,143
0
0
manaman said:
Clashero said:
I was a victim of American public school for 2 years. Two wasted years, mind you. I got the worst possible education I could imagine. The coursework was piss-easy, the teachers were inept, and the students were idiots (HOW CAN YOU NOT KNOW HOW TO DO PERCENTAGES IN SEVENTH GRADE!?). Geography knowledge was, at best, atrocious. PE was a joke, since you were graded on "effort" solely, and not on ability, aptitude or skill at all. "Science" class was basically doing my 4th-5th grade Natural Sciences class again. All tests were multiple choice, even mathematics (as if it weren't easy enough to have a test on perimeters of basic geometric shapes in seventh grade).
You don't need more hours, you need to get better teachers, who'll make the children work hard and study their asses off.
Then you where not taking the right classes, you didn't care to try and get anything out of the system, didn't know how to, or where at one of the few schools that offers no advanced lesson plans.

I went to high school in Texas, should you want to you could skate by and earn what was basically a "went to school" degree. Or you could apply your self and graduate with honors as they called it. The level of education of the classes you had to take to graduate with honors was an a whole different level. I know I spent 3 years on that track before dropping out going to alternative (a work at your own pace type school)and completing the last year in three months. It was that easy because they did not offer the honors track in the alternative school.

Seriously you gotta work for your education here in the US, but most schools will allow you to excel and if you truly apply your self obtain a good education. We need to work on motivating kids to want the best education they can get, and start phasing out the easy classes.
I didn't study a single minute during my two years of American public school and my lowest grade at the end of either year was a 94 or 95. Hell, I even had over 9000 100 in some subjects, which I thought was physically impossible.

And I did take the right classes. PE, because I had been mislead to believe that there would be actual physical excertion (Was I wrong. Everyone trained and dieted for weeks before a mile-long timed run we had. I did shit about it and still finished in under 5 minutes, while everyone was 10 minutes in and fighting for every breath of air), Art, because I love art, although all we learned that year was a bit of colour theory, perspective and colouring on pastels. I took Computing, no complaints there. Lots of MS Office and HTML. My other optional class was... er... right, I can't remember its name, but it was meant to help you figure out what career to choose. It consisted of one semester listening to music, and another semester getting really damn good at Flight Simulator.

Mind you, I was top o' the class in every class I took (even English, which, being a foreigner, was a bit unexpected), and they were all High-level/Advanced classes. I finished the "Advanced Mathematics" course book in about 5 hours, while everyone else took 5 months. Those 5 hours include having to learn your nonsensical measuring system.

A test I took told me I read like someone who's at college-level education, which, judging by how little English I knew then compared to what I know now, means your colleges have really, really low expectations.
 

shotgunbob

New member
Mar 24, 2009
651
0
0
I learn plenty from my school. Im smart and so are most people. But for some people in my school they just don't give a crap about what their grade is and thats the problem
 

Thamous

New member
Sep 23, 2008
396
0
0
Yes because more of an awful education system will make it ten times better. God forbid you improve the education its self.
 

ccdistancerunner

New member
Sep 11, 2008
191
0
0
Clashero said:
manaman said:
Clashero said:
I was a victim of American public school for 2 years. Two wasted years, mind you. I got the worst possible education I could imagine. The coursework was piss-easy, the teachers were inept, and the students were idiots (HOW CAN YOU NOT KNOW HOW TO DO PERCENTAGES IN SEVENTH GRADE!?). Geography knowledge was, at best, atrocious. PE was a joke, since you were graded on "effort" solely, and not on ability, aptitude or skill at all. "Science" class was basically doing my 4th-5th grade Natural Sciences class again. All tests were multiple choice, even mathematics (as if it weren't easy enough to have a test on perimeters of basic geometric shapes in seventh grade).
You don't need more hours, you need to get better teachers, who'll make the children work hard and study their asses off.
Then you where not taking the right classes, you didn't care to try and get anything out of the system, didn't know how to, or where at one of the few schools that offers no advanced lesson plans.

I went to high school in Texas, should you want to you could skate by and earn what was basically a "went to school" degree. Or you could apply your self and graduate with honors as they called it. The level of education of the classes you had to take to graduate with honors was an a whole different level. I know I spent 3 years on that track before dropping out going to alternative (a work at your own pace type school)and completing the last year in three months. It was that easy because they did not offer the honors track in the alternative school.

Seriously you gotta work for your education here in the US, but most schools will allow you to excel and if you truly apply your self obtain a good education. We need to work on motivating kids to want the best education they can get, and start phasing out the easy classes.
I didn't study a single minute during my two years of American public school and my lowest grade at the end of either year was a 94 or 95. Hell, I even had over 9000 100 in some subjects, which I thought was physically impossible.

And I did take the right classes. PE, because I had been mislead to believe that there would be actual physical excertion (Was I wrong. Everyone trained and dieted for weeks before a mile-long timed run we had. I did shit about it and still finished in under 5 minutes, while everyone was 10 minutes in and fighting for every breath of air), Art, because I love art, although all we learned that year was a bit of colour theory, perspective and colouring on pastels. I took Computing, no complaints there. Lots of MS Office and HTML. My other optional class was... er... right, I can't remember its name, but it was meant to help you figure out what career to choose. It consisted of one semester listening to music, and another semester getting really damn good at Flight Simulator.

Mind you, I was top o' the class in every class I took (even English, which, being a foreigner, was a bit unexpected), and they were all High-level/Advanced classes. I finished the "Advanced Mathematics" course book in about 5 hours, while everyone else took 5 months. Those 5 hours include having to learn your nonsensical measuring system.

A test I took told me I read like someone who's at college-level education, which, judging by how little English I knew then compared to what I know now, means your colleges have really, really low expectations.
And this is the reason why America has fallen from first in the WORLD to damn near last in all sciences and math education. Other countries 3rd graders are doing what our 7th graders are. That's why you see tons of foreign doctors, scientists, ect. in skilled positions.