Evaheist666 said:
*goes beneath flame shield and transmits with long-range radio*
Every single Mario and Zelda game after Super Mario Bros on NES and Zelda 2 have been blatant plagiarism of said games. trouble is, Nintendo fanboys are as bad as (if not worse than) Apple fanboys. So it really doesn't matter. New Mario Game = Insta-buy.
Oh, and also Quantum Theory.
I like how *puts up flame shield* is always followed by possibly the dumbest statement a person could make because they know they couldn't defend their point with any evidence.
Your flame shield is broken, because you will suffer my laser guided wrath.
It isn't plagiarism if it the original creator and original company are involved. If Miyamoto had left Nintendo 10 years ago and stated he doesn't like where the franchise is going, if the characters belong to Nintendo and NOT Miyamoto, then Miyamoto cannot complain. But he's been there the whole way. He was just at E3.
By Your logic, Mark twain stole the idea of Adventured of Huckleberry Finn from Twain's Adventures of Tom Sawyer. George Lucas stole the idea and made the Star Wars prequels without the consent of the original creator because he watched Star Wars 4,5,6.
Plagiarism is the use of another person's ideas and claiming them as your own. Plagiarism would be if I took a copy of Mega Man 4, cracked the coding, removed all of the credits of the people who made it put my name in it instead and renamed it Blue Hero Boy and expecting people to not know what I did.
If I were to make as bold a statement as to say Mario games plagiarize from other Mario games, I'd sure as hell bring some evidence and be able to defend what I said.
Now, for possibly the dumbest part of your statement: Zelda games are a copy of Zelda 2? You had to pick the strange Zelda game, didn't you. Not only did you make a bold statement with intend to flame, but you also move on to show how little you actually know of the subject. How dare you? How dare you attempt to participate in this conversation with such nothing? Do you know anything about Mario and Zelda games other than they're popular with Nintendo? I doubt it.
Did Mario 1, 2 or 3 exist in a 3D world? No. Did Mario 1, 2 or 3 Allow Mario to take more than 3 hits? No. Did Mario 1, 2 or 3 involve Mario and Boweser teaming up to fight a tribe of evil robots? No. Did Mario 1, 2 or 3 have Yoshi? No. Did Mario 1, 2 or 3 involve Bowser eating Mario and Luigi and then the brother had to fight Bowser from the inside? No.
Did Zelda 2... I guess it would be easier to say which games actually were similar to Zelda 2. Actually I'm going to ignore you put the 2 on there because your statement was just too strange. Zelda games that involve shrinking Link to an incredibly tiny size? Zelda game that saw the world flooded and a child Link must team up with pirates to save his sister? Zelda game where Link is a train conductor and Zelda is actively participating in the adventure? Zelda game where Link is split into 4 different Links who must all work together to save the day? Zelda game where Link is turned into a wolf?
big question time: do all Mario game share common traits and ideas? Do all Zelda games share common traits and ideas? Of course they do. If they don't, it becomes very strange. In the 1 game where Link was 3rd Person Shooting, it was very strange. But all of the other games share the same spirit, same goes for the Mario games.
Now I'm going easy on you because I'm tired, but next time before you make some non-sense claim as you did, be prepared to back up your words because on the internet you will not always find a person as kind as I am right now.