Most Evil Human In History Aside From the Big Two

Recommended Videos

John the Gamer

New member
May 2, 2010
1,021
0
0
The world leaders anno 1900-1914(pre-WWI) as they actively steared the world towards a war which threw the world into relative chaos for a better part of the century:

-1914-1918 WWI
-1936-1945 WWII
-1946-1989 Cold War and all its conflicts
-1990's-2011 Mostly religious wars and conflicts over oil.(post-colonial conflicts mostly)


I chose these guys: (Germans, French, British, Russians, Americans, Ottomans and Italians)

As they set the stage for the murdering of between 55 000 000 and 137 000 000 in the two World Wars alone.

WWI killed | 0.8%-3.6% of the world population,
WWII killed | 1.7%-3.1%

Btw, the biggest conflict in history was the An Lushan Rebellion in China (755-763 AD), killing 14.0%-15.3% of the world population (33,000,000-36,000,000 people at the time)

Anyways thats it, and don't forget:
France is a bastard. Lol.


P.S.: Look this up, China is really good in getting lots of people killed in wars, famines, genocides and the sort. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_wars_and_anthropogenic_disasters_by_death_toll

P.P.S: And no, I do not bear a grudge against the French, Chinese or anyone else. If you feel offended in anyway, just go and cry on your mothers shoulder or something.

EDIT: I also just found this on google:
http://listverse.com/2007/09/05/top-10-most-evil-men/
http://listverse.com/2007/09/09/top-10-most-evil-women/
 

HardkorSB

New member
Mar 18, 2010
1,477
0
0
Blatherscythe said:
READ THE WHOLE POST

As a species we have produced some rather poor specimens. We have had dictators, serial killers, pedophiles and other degenerates in our society. But which is the worst? Which person is the epitome of human scum?

The answer to that question varies from person to person, we have seen many wastes of skin in our brief time on earth. From Stalin to Charles Manson there are plenty of human garbage to pick from.

So who get's your vote for most evil human in history? It can be anyone, but to avoid repeat answers I'll have to ask you to refrain from answering Hitler or Stalin. So aside from them, who is one person that you wish was never born? And please explain why.

Personally, Idi Amin comes to mind. He was born in a Ugandan tribe and joined the army, he was an immense human being with incredible physical strengths. When the British left Uganda he was promoted to Colonel, and began to commit murders and steal money. Before he was delt with he disposed of the current leader at the time in a military coup and began to build he army to get himself more money and power. His army was made up of thugs who raped and tortured many people under Amin's orders, they ran a jail that had only 7 survivors who only survived because they ate human flesh and drink their own urine to live. Amin was thought to be a canibal. He even kept the heads of certain victems in his fridge and had photos of people being tortured in his jails for his own pleasure. He even chopped up his first wife when she displeased him.

He also purged anyone who wasen't a born Ugandan from Uganda, leading to an economic crisis in the country when no one knew how to run the stores they were given. Amin made his thugs step up their cruelty. He eventually was taken out of power when he invaded another African country and his thugs only knowing how to bully civilians got their asses kicked. There he fled to Saudi Arabia and got asylum there, he never paid for his crimes.

I picked this monster because unlike many leaders at the time he had no real politcal agenda, he was just a greedy bastard with a drive for power.
This guy maybe?
 

Harry Mason

New member
Mar 7, 2011
617
0
0
Brockyman said:
Harry Mason said:
Brockyman said:
Harry Mason said:
I'm going with this guy...

No, he's not really "evil" or the "worst ever," but he does have a large part in American civilization back pedaling so voraciously and being so proud of it. He really should be taken off the air. With a sniper bullet, if that's what it takes.
I don't get why someone can get banned on this website for posting "First" on a forum, but when you advocate the murder or a TV personality b/c you disagree with him... Maybe you should add your name to the list..
Yeah... The sniper assassination part? That was a joke. The "[being] a large part in American civilization back pedaling so voraciously and being so proud of it?" That was the sentiment. I have no issue with people I disagree with, some I even love (Yahtzee, to name someone on this site). The problem I have with Mr. Bill is the amount of power he wields over the American public... Power no one political figure, much less journalist, should ever have.

Did you actually think I was "advocating murder?" Because, if so, you have officially upstaged the original joke!
Honestly, if you want to make a joke, you need to put a "lol" or something to show your joking. Sarcasm doesn't come across well in posts...

Also, he really doesn't have that much "power". He has a TV and radio show, just like Ed Shultz, Rachel Maddow, Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, Glenn Beck, Keith Olberman (use too, Lawrence O'Donnell, Chris Matthews, and many other Liberal and Conservative commentators. They are opinion/commentary shows and I know for a fact that most of these people don't frame themselves as "journalists" (a term i don't think really exists anymore), but commentators who put the news in the perspective of their believes.

The issue is, the liberal ones are never really successful commercially. Most MSNBC commentators are liberals while most of Fox News are conservatives (Ironic that the people who ***** about Fox News won't point out the liberal bias on MSNBC/NBC News, but I digress...). MSNBC constantly gets their butt handed to them by Fox News and center left leaning CNN.

When most Americans have a choice to watch a commentator, they choose Bill, or Sean, or Beck, not Rachel, or ED, or Lawrence.

This is because the majority of the country is center-right/libertarian/conservative. There is a loud group of hard-left liberals and communist/socialist that have a large voice in the news and entertainment media that have great sway, but it never sticks.

So, to sum it all up.
1.Sorry I misunderstood the joke, but you may want to denote that its a joke next time to protect yourself
2. The only power Bill has is the one given to him by a fan base and a nation that doesn't always agree with him, but have more libertarian/Conservative values
The day I write the world "lol" on the internet or anywhere else is the day a secret society of ninjas swoop in through my window, slit my throat, and gain access to all of internet accounts to slander me. Chatspeak is the work of demons.

I understand what you are saying, but ratings and surveys have shown time and again that Bill is one of the most trusted sources of "NEWS" anywhere. People, too many people, take what he says at face value without a second thought. There is no one else in "news" who holds the scale of sway that he does. The only person who can compete with his ratings is John Stewart, who is a fucking COMEDIAN.

I see Bill's power over the American public as problematic because of my personal opinions and views. As far as I'm concerned, his blindly religious, pro-life, homophobic, sexist "opinions" being pawned off as fact by "Faux News" are detrimental in the highest possible way to the psyches of an already delicately stupid viewing audience.

The thread is about people's opinions on evil human beings, not on qualifying factors that everyone agrees are present in evil human beings. I think he's a scary fuckhead with an army of dimwitted Bible Thumpers backing him up. I don't like him, lol.
 

kayisking

New member
Sep 14, 2010
676
0
0
Blatherscythe said:
Nouw said:
Pedophiles? Oh come on OP, you can't help being retarded just like you can't help being a pedophilia. At least that's what Wikipedia tells me...

Anyway, I have no idea. My definition of 'evil' isn't fixed.
Sounds like you took a lot of offense there, something you want to tell us? And calling me retarded? Why? Some Pedophiles are more sick and dangerous than just people with a fetish.
I do not think he is calling you retarded. He is saying that, like retards, pedophiles can't change what they are (something I by the way do not agree with).
 

Gotterdammerung

New member
Jan 13, 2011
42
0
0
I'll probably go with Gengis Khan, purely for destroying what chance the East had at becoming the major nations of the world.

I mean, they had universities and schools, and they were the most advanced nations in the world, and were destroyed by the Mongols.

Want an example? Baghdad. The second city to reach a million citizens (the first being Rome), and was a seat of learning and wisdom. And the Mongols sacked it, set it on fire, and salted it's fields and destroyed it's irrigation system. Long story short, desertification set in, and it became the arid land you see today.

So much wasted opperunity, and the Crusades didn't really help, destroying the tolerant culture that accepted men of all creeds, and instead replacing it with the conservative, xenophobic one that you can still see today.
 

Raddra

Trashpanda
Jan 5, 2010
698
0
21
Vuljatar said:
Mao Zedong.
This x2.

Absolutely evil scumbag. His rule from 1949 to 1976 is believed to have caused the deaths of 40 to 70 million people.
 

Trolldor

New member
Jan 20, 2011
1,849
0
0
Mohammud, there are a few popes and saints to pick from too. Mother Theresa... hmmm, who else...
 

The_ModeRazor

New member
Jul 29, 2009
2,837
0
0
That Temuchin dude? What's his other name... oh yeah, Genghis motherfucking Khan. Murdering people left right and center with his unstoppable army? Check. Terrorizing them further with heads mounted on pikes/whatever? Check. Doing this on a fucking global scale, spanning more than one continent? Check. Directly responsible for the spread of the Black Death? Check. More people died because of him than because of Hitler and Stalin put together? Check.

I'd say he was a pretty bad person.
 

hiks89

New member
Oct 22, 2008
261
0
0
Hamish Durie said:
Before reading furthure please note that I am not saying that you are evil for folling christianity.

dam just one guy or a whole group if a whole group it would have to be christianity from about 2000 years ago not mordern day christens very very very sorry if you took offense and if modderaters take this down i understand but considering that they basiclly had more power then any one else at the time from about 1000AD and 1600AD they ruled your life in Europe.

some priests had heratics, witches, and homosexuals tourtued or burned at the stake (thats where the term ****** was inveted to mean gays, they tossed them on witches fires saying that they where faggots of wood)
They started a holy war killing thousands and making a feud that goes on to this day destroyed many many native religions when exploration started
science and further human advancement barely moved and inch
not saying that any mordern christiens are evil today just saying that much pain and suffering has been done by those who say they do Gods work.


I know that christiens have done alot of good but in my own opinion christianity has alot against it.
DAWKINS WILL PREVAIL!!!
 

alinos

New member
Nov 18, 2009
256
0
0
God,Jesus,(person who wrote bible) however you want to put it.

Religion had resulted in more deaths than anything else, person who created the belief should be erased from history
 

SL33TBL1ND

Elite Member
Nov 9, 2008
6,467
0
41
Blatherscythe said:
Nouw said:
Pedophiles? Oh come on OP, you can't help being retarded just like you can't help being a pedophilia. At least that's what Wikipedia tells me...

Anyway, I have no idea. My definition of 'evil' isn't fixed.
Sounds like you took a lot of offense there, something you want to tell us? And calling me retarded? Why? Some Pedophiles are more sick and dangerous than just people with a fetish.
I think he was just saying (impolitely, I might add) that paedophiles suffer from a mental problem. I don't think listing someone with issues is fair in this list, it isn't their fault they like the kiddies.
 

WarCorrespondent

New member
Sep 27, 2010
114
0
0
I hate people with a certain personality defect. I'm not quite sure if they are classified as "sociopaths" or something else, so I've nick-named them "Black Hole Personalities".

Basically, it's people who can never get enough of that one thing. Money is certainly a common one, you've met that person that argues with the manager for an hour to get that 2 for one deal that ended yesterday.

I've met a guy who'd convince a girl against her will to bonk him. While this isn't rape, it was using his endless and uncaring need for sex that preyed upon her lesser self-confidence.

So yes, I'm pretty sure they are sociopaths, and I hate them.
 

pliusmannn

New member
Dec 4, 2008
245
0
0
i guess hitler and stalin wasn't so bad, there was this mass of ignoraant pathetic people who did everything that those two said to do, the mass is evil, human as a person thinking for himself is not
 

gbemery

New member
Jun 27, 2009
907
0
0
Well if you want to go with strictly instant death counts I might say Harry Truman for giving the go ahead on the a-bombs on Japan...but if you delve deeper you get into all the options he had to way..so..then you could say the Emperor of Japan at the time since he technically allowed it to happen a second time...but then he maybe wasn't sure if we had another bomb... ;/ I don't know OP this is something I need to ponder...hmm maybe FDR (Franklin D. Roosevelt) for passing all that "New Deal" crap and social security?
 
Jun 26, 2010
85
0
0
Hamish Durie said:
Before reading furthure please note that I am not saying that you are evil for folling christianity.

dam just one guy or a whole group if a whole group it would have to be christianity from about 2000 years ago not mordern day christens very very very sorry if you took offense and if modderaters take this down i understand but considering that they basiclly had more power then any one else at the time from about 1000AD and 1600AD they ruled your life in Europe.

some priests had heratics, witches, and homosexuals tourtued or burned at the stake (thats where the term ****** was inveted to mean gays, they tossed them on witches fires saying that they where faggots of wood)
They started a holy war killing thousands and making a feud that goes on to this day destroyed many many native religions when exploration started
science and further human advancement barely moved and inch
not saying that any mordern christiens are evil today just saying that much pain and suffering has been done by those who say they do Gods work.


I know that christiens have done alot of good but in my own opinion christianity has alot against it.
Agreeing with this.
 

Yokai

New member
Oct 31, 2008
1,982
0
0
Dr. Mengele. He was so coldly rational about using humans as lab rats, and the vast majority of his experiments were downright horrifying. Being insane and sadistic is one thing, but having full control of your mental facilities and still believing there is nothing wrong with dissecting living humans...well, you really can't get much more evil than that.
 

DrathLegion

New member
Mar 28, 2011
8
0
0
If we are looking to more modern versions of evil, Uganda is full of them;

Vincent Otti
Dominic Ongwen
Okot Odhiambo

I'm putting all three here because if I've understood correctly they are/were (who knows when that's going to an all out form again) all, sort of, on the same side in the northern Uganda conflict. And they are all charged with the same things; rape, slavery, sex slavery, forced recruitment of child soldiers, mass murder, mutilation of several thousands.
All are still at large, and all are still alive (far as we know) today. We really don't need to look far to find some evil fucking assholes in this world.