Most Evil Human In History Aside From the Big Two

Recommended Videos

Baradiel

New member
Mar 4, 2009
1,077
0
0
Besides the views of good and evil being exactly that, views, I would probably go with many people involved in the Bosnia-Serbia conflict.

Reading through the accounts of the genocide... I felt genuinely shocked and disgusted, and I don't shock/disgust easily.
 

Jon Shannow

New member
Oct 11, 2010
258
0
0
While definitely not the most evil when compared to some people it'd still like to put him forwards as pretty evil: Thomas More, he burned people because they had the gall to own a bible in english
 

Turing

New member
Dec 25, 2008
346
0
0
gbemery said:
Well if you want to go with strictly instant death counts I might say Harry Truman for giving the go ahead on the a-bombs on Japan...but if you delve deeper you get into all the options he had to way..so..then you could say the Emperor of Japan at the time since he technically allowed it to happen a second time...but then he maybe wasn't sure if we had another bomb... ;/ I don't know OP this is something I need to ponder...hmm maybe FDR (Franklin D. Roosevelt) for passing all that "New Deal" crap and social security?
I'm sorry, did you just claim that "New Deal" was an evil thing?


OT: I don't believe in evil, or good. Under the right circumstances we're all equally capable of committing atrocities and it doesn't have anything to do with some sort of meta-physical, imaginary moral compass.
 

Pyotr Romanov

New member
Jul 8, 2009
575
0
0
Blatherscythe said:
By dangerous I meant in slit the throat of the victem after they've had their fun for a few days, of course this is after they kept them locked in the basement like an animal. We have had a few cases where people have taken children and kept them as slaves. It happened in the US a couple years back, I can't remember the names but this person was kidnapped and used as a sex-slave of a pedophile for almost half of her life.
Now, I happen to like people of the opposite sex who are about my own age, such a terrible offense! I could potentially lock one up and slit her throat after I'm bored of her, I must be a monster because of my sexual preferences!
Yeah, I doubt it works the way you think, friend. Non pedo's do wrong too, perhaps more often than pedophiles because there are more of them.

When I said pedophile, I mean't child rapist. Getting off to kids is wrong in it's own way but as long as it doesn't escalate from a mere fetish it's tolerable.
That sounds better, using the correct wording helps, at least we now know what you're talking about.
And yeah, I agree it's one of the worst things you can do to an individual, rape them in their childhood. I wouldn't call it the most evil thing in the world, though, as that insinuates the whole world has something to do with it.
That said, I think I'd go for Mao, like so many others have.
 

Blobbert

New member
Dec 10, 2010
8
0
0
Hamish Durie said:
Before reading furthure please note that I am not saying that you are evil for folling christianity.

dam just one guy or a whole group if a whole group it would have to be christianity from about 2000 years ago not mordern day christens very very very sorry if you took offense and if modderaters take this down i understand but considering that they basiclly had more power then any one else at the time from about 1000AD and 1600AD they ruled your life in Europe.

some priests had heratics, witches, and homosexuals tourtued or burned at the stake (thats where the term ****** was inveted to mean gays, they tossed them on witches fires saying that they where faggots of wood)
They started a holy war killing thousands and making a feud that goes on to this day destroyed many many native religions when exploration started
science and further human advancement barely moved and inch
not saying that any mordern christiens are evil today just saying that much pain and suffering has been done by those who say they do Gods work.


I know that christiens have done alot of good but in my own opinion christianity has alot against it.
So essentially, not Christians, but Dark-ages Catholics. Them and the Westboro Baptist Church.
 

ABLb0y

New member
Aug 27, 2010
1,075
0
0
Going to have to say Jeffery Dahmer. Mostly because he kidnapped a teenage boy, who escaped, and then he manipulated the police into thinking he was his 19-year-old lover, (He was infact 14, same age as me.) and promised to "Take care of him."

Poor kid was dismembered later that night.
 

Rockchimp69

New member
Dec 4, 2010
427
0
0
Blatherscythe said:
falconsgyre said:
Blatherscythe said:
falconsgyre said:
Blatherscythe said:
Nouw said:
Pedophiles? Oh come on OP, you can't help being retarded just like you can't help being a pedophilia. At least that's what Wikipedia tells me...

Anyway, I have no idea. My definition of 'evil' isn't fixed.
Sounds like you took a lot of offense there, something you want to tell us? And calling me retarded? Why? Some Pedophiles are more sick and dangerous than just people with a fetish.
A soldier is more dangerous than the average person. Are they necessarily more evil?
By dangerous I meant in slit the throat of the victem after they've had their fun for a few days, of course this is after they kept them locked in the basement like an animal. We have had a few cases where people have taken children and kept them as slaves. It happened in the US a couple years back, I can't remember the names but this person was kidnapped and used as a sex-slave of a pedophile for almost half of her life.
Dulcinea said:
falconsgyre said:
Blatherscythe said:
Nouw said:
Pedophiles? Oh come on OP, you can't help being retarded just like you can't help being a pedophilia. At least that's what Wikipedia tells me...

Anyway, I have no idea. My definition of 'evil' isn't fixed.
Sounds like you took a lot of offense there, something you want to tell us? And calling me retarded? Why? Some Pedophiles are more sick and dangerous than just people with a fetish.
A soldier is more dangerous than the average person. Are they necessarily more evil?
You took that out of context.

OT: the man who raped me. Yeah, maybe selfish, but whatever.

Looking past myself, the most evil person in history would have to be... Hm... That's a tough call. So many ways to judge evil. I dunno. Too hard!

To both of you, I was just supporting the point that it's not having a sexual attraction to children that's wrong; it's actually having sex with them. I've never personally met any pedophiles, but I gather that there are quite a few who have an attraction yet understand that the actual sex would be wrong. I'm not sure I feel comfortable saying that kind of person is evil. The example of a solider was to say that the potential to do something shouldn't be counted the same as the act.
When I said pedophile, I mean't child rapist. Getting off to kids is wrong in it's own way but as long as it doesn't escalate from a mere fetish it's tolerable.
Getting off to kids is NOT wrong. Some people are born with attractions to children, as long as they don't rape them why is that a fucking problem?

What about gays?
What about transexuals?
What about people who aren't sexual?
Why not burn them all because they're different?

The person i think is the most evil human being ever is the one that says being different is wrong,
The religious fanatic,
The racist dictator etc.

Edit: and just to be clear, i'm not a childmolester trying to stick up for my "buddies". I am a teenager who doesn't feel like being molested just as mch as anyone else.
 

YuheJi

New member
Mar 17, 2009
927
0
0
A name I want to put forth is Atila the Hun. Sortta like Genghis Khan conquering a bunch of nations, but while Genghis Khan wanted to create an empire, Attila only wanted to kill and rape and pillage.
 

CliveMurdoc626

New member
Apr 1, 2009
176
0
0
I kinda want to say Kim Jong-il or Andrei Chikatilo(who was like the worse version of Jeffery Dahmer or Ed Gein) but I think they were more crazy than evil(still evil but the crazy kinda diminishes some responsibility "SOME"). I think a strong candidate for this is the President of Zimbabwe Robert Mugabe. Basically he is the most corrupt and unscrupulous bastard I've ever heard of. I believe he instituted a program called clean the filth where he pretty much evicted everyone below the poverty line into camps like District 9 except not as nice, whoever doesn't comply is executed. In addition he has an admiration of Hitler and has compared himself by saying "This Hitler has only one objective: justice for his people, sovereignty for his people, recognition of the independence of his people and their rights over their resources. If that is Hitler, then let me be a Hitler tenfold". I think the estimate of casualties of his regime is over six million people.
 

Casual Shinji

Should've gone before we left.
Legacy
Jul 18, 2009
20,519
5,335
118
I'll go with something more current: The evangelical pastors of the Nigerian state Akwa Ibom.

Children of that state are the target of witch persecution, and those preachers are mainly the cause of it all.
You can read the messy details here: http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2007/dec/09/tracymcveigh.theobserver
 

William MacKay

New member
Oct 26, 2010
573
0
0
i find it worrying that someone was suspended for saying Mao Zedong.
OT: id have to say Gadaffi, because of what happened last month.
 

ScumbagEddie

New member
Mar 29, 2011
137
0
0
Gilles de Rais

Served in the Hundred Years' War and fought alongside Joan of Arc thru the Siege of Orléans. Went on to rape and murder children. Disgusting.
 

NightHawk21

New member
Dec 8, 2010
1,273
0
0
I'm gonna take a most likely controversial stance in that I think that all these people should remain in history as they are now (yes, even Hitler and Stalin). What I think you seem to be forgetting OP is that sometime you have to fuck up real bad before people realize how bad a thing actually missed. Arguing for the non-existence of any of these murderous individuals would only give rise to a new and larger tyrant and most likely a later time, with more destructive power than ever in his hands and without any protocols or past experiences about what these kind of people can/ will do. Arguing for the non-existence of some evil people is like arguing that the atomic bomb shouldn't have been dropped at the end of WW2, and say what you will, but its better that they dropped it 70 years ago than they didn't and decide to drop one of these new nukes in an upcoming war. Fuck ups lead to experience, which leads to people doing something for once.
 

Adamc-mh

New member
Jun 6, 2010
328
0
0
Ian Brady the one of the people who committed the "moor's murders" he taped a little girl pleading for her life and then slaughtered her.
 

Zac Smith

New member
Apr 25, 2010
672
0
0
Archduke Franz Ferdinand, if he hadn't have been born it would mean he wouldn't have been assassinated which means no WWI, which in turn would lead to no WWII, Stalin or Hitler. Or the jewish holocaust either
 

Turing

New member
Dec 25, 2008
346
0
0
Zac Smith said:
Archduke Franz Ferdinand, if he hadn't have been born it would mean he wouldn't have been assassinated which means no WWI, which in turn would lead to no WWII, Stalin or Hitler. Or the jewish holocaust either
Wouldn't that make Gavrilo Princip the evil one, or can you apply "evil" to person simply for being born?
 

deshorty

New member
Dec 30, 2010
220
0
0
Well..imo, Stalin is actually the 3rd or 4th most evil human if that. In history and now, there are so many more evil people that haven't even contributed anything to the world. At the very least Stalin gave Russia a decent standard of living. But enough about that. In my opinion, the Empress Dowager CiXi, is the most evil human in history (aside from Hitler). She indirectly killed hundreds of people in the Boxer Rebellions, (which ended in failure for everyone involved), she put China back several decades technologically because of her desire for power and overall put China in the worst state it had been in since the first opium war.