Caligula. . If you wanna know why. He watched his whole city burn while playing the violin. And forced people to watch him act (he was crap) And if they didnt like it they got executed.
Nero you're thinking of mate. And just to be clear violins hadn't been invented yet and Nero actually acted quickly and effectively to try and stop the fire.
Now Caligula, he was a much nastier piece of work. Started well, then took Bacchus' revelries a bit to far for modern liking (or ancient Roman for that matter).
Amin and Mao were the two who immediately came to mind. I think people have already explained why: Mao for being a demagogue who spurred a desperate population to commit mass atrocities, Amin for being...well, just generally awful.
This thread couldn't possibly have lasted more than 3 posts without someone making this "joke".
Classy dude. Real freaking classy.
On topic.
I would have to say that other than those two (Hitler, Stalin) It would be Jack the ripper. Like even though no one knows who he was (there are theory's) What he did was simply horrible. in the best cases all he did was skin them alive.
Honorable mentions include the folks that organized the Cambodian genocide (Pol Pot, Ta mok and the rest) that took 1.7 million lives all up and the Snow town murderers: John Bunting, Robert Wagner, Mark Haydon and James Vlassakis who all took the time to torture their 12 victims with methods such as electrocuting their genitalia and forcing them to eat their own flesh on one case.
You sir, are ridiculous. I understand your viewpoint, but I'm pretty sure he didn't INTEND to cause more damage to our environment than any other individual ever...
Sounds like you took a lot of offense there, something you want to tell us? And calling me retarded? Why? Some Pedophiles are more sick and dangerous than just people with a fetish.
No, he's not really "evil" or the "worst ever," but he does have a large part in American civilization back pedaling so voraciously and being so proud of it. He really should be taken off the air. With a sniper bullet, if that's what it takes.
Right.... Because it's such a sign of tolerance and decency to openly endorse murdering people with whom you disagree politically. Good the fuck on you.
Seriously, what the hell is wrong with you? "I don't like his show. He must die." That is some seriously bullshit logic, and I think you know it. Or, at least, you'd likely try to call someone else on it if they said that about someone you like. And, no. I don't give a shit that you claim to have been joking. I think that you backpedaled into that when you got called on your bullshit, quite frankly.
I think its hard to judge with such unclear grounds, Judging by most killed or the omtivations behind the attrocieties. In any case, apart from the afore mentioned two I would have to say Eddie Gein, although it was never proved how many people he killed when his house was searched the police found (Courtesy wikipedia)
Four noses
Whole human bones and fragments
Nine masks of human skin
Bowls made from human skulls
Ten female heads with the tops sawn off
Human skin covering several chair seats
Mary Hogan's head in a paper bag
Bernice Worden's head in a burlap sack
Nine vulvas in a shoe box
Skulls on his bedposts
Organs in the refrigerator
A pair of lips on a draw string for a windowshade
A belt made from human female nipples
A lampshade made from the skin from a human face
Well while Hitler counts around 8 milion victims and Stalin around 20 milions Mao counts around 50 milion. All in the history books it's not me doing pseudo-science, so I guess you should count him up there no problems.
I don't think in death counts, I believe horrific actions have more to say. Therefore I think Idi Amin was much worse than Mao. Mao is generally well respected in China, if he was a sick monster that wouldn't be the case. He was a massive jerk on many points, but he gave the country quite a lot of strength and independence.
None are worse than those who torture innocents for kicks, their brains are just f'ed up.
Edit: Shadowfacets example is spot on, that's just sick.
You sir, are ridiculous. I understand your viewpoint, but I'm pretty sure he didn't INTEND to cause more damage to our environment than any other individual ever...
It's less about the accidental damage to the environment than his unwillingness to look for an alternative. It was more a case of "that will do." I admit it isn't exactly evil but then evil is very subjective being a man made conception. Nothing in nature beyond the human race can be called evil the way we use it.
Sounds like you took a lot of offense there, something you want to tell us? And calling me retarded? Why? Some Pedophiles are more sick and dangerous than just people with a fetish.
Sounds like you took a lot of offense there, something you want to tell us? And calling me retarded? Why? Some Pedophiles are more sick and dangerous than just people with a fetish.
By dangerous I meant in slit the throat of the victem after they've had their fun for a few days, of course this is after they kept them locked in the basement like an animal. We have had a few cases where people have taken children and kept them as slaves. It happened in the US a couple years back, I can't remember the names but this person was kidnapped and used as a sex-slave of a pedophile for almost half of her life.
Sounds like you took a lot of offense there, something you want to tell us? And calling me retarded? Why? Some Pedophiles are more sick and dangerous than just people with a fetish.
To both of you, I was just supporting the point that it's not having a sexual attraction to children that's wrong; it's actually having sex with them. I've never personally met any pedophiles, but I gather that there are quite a few who have an attraction yet understand that the actual sex would be wrong. I'm not sure I feel comfortable saying that kind of person is evil. The example of a solider was to say that the potential to do something shouldn't be counted the same as the act.
When I said pedophile, I mean't child rapist. Getting off to kids is wrong in it's own way but as long as it doesn't escalate from a mere fetish it's tolerable.
Now I KNOW this is probably not a clever thing for me to say BUT, mistaking a paedophile for a child rapist is a HUGE error. I myself am not either of those things, but there is a difference between somebody that cannot help an attraction to something, and a RAPIST.
I am a straight male, I have an attraction to women. OP, would it be OK for you to treat me like somebody that would - or has - raped a woman? Just because I admit an attraction towards females, I am not necessarily going to rape one.
"Some Pedophiles are more sick and dangerous than just people with a fetish"
Yes, and so are some 'regular' people.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.