Angerwing said:
First of all, you seemed to butt into his opinion sharing with no problem, so why can't I butt into this?
You need an answer - go look at his original reply to my comment - I can't recall the exact page but it's around somewhere and it warranted a response - as did his reply after that - it's called a debate. What disrupts a decent debate are people that come in and disrupt it - especially when they know nothing themselves.
He didn't enjoy a certain convention of the game, and that made him not want to continue with the game. That's his opinion.
Actually you're wrong...again... - his initial response was "I didn't like this game it was emo". Slightly different from what you're saying. Besides which, an opinion is one thing, bashing a game because he doesn't understand it is different - this again stems back to the fact you have o idea what we were discussing and therefore can't properly engage in discussion bar repeating petty lines about opinion.
You can't turn around and say "But that part of the game makes sense, you MUST love that part of the game." Because it just doesn't work like that. You don't have to understand anything in this situation.
Nope, but calling a game "emo", most certainly does warrant discussion, such as "how"?.
A part of the game of the game he didn't like. He's not wrong about that, and just because some fanboy tells him his opinion is wrong, doesn't mean his opinion will ever change. This isn't something he misunderstood, but something he didn't enjoy.
No - he's saying he didn't enjoy the game because he didn't understand it - hence the whole debate in the first place, in which I corrected his more moronic comments.
And if you say he's wrong about that, then you're thicker than I thought.
Heh, that is sly, your basically saying "if you argue back and prove my flimsy argument about an argument I know nothing about, about a game I know nothing about wrong, then your thick". Nice one - real classy, you're still wrong though - no amount of bullshit can hide it.