AquaAscension said:
What's going on here is that Movie Bob is probably formally trained in the profession of watching movies. Probably went to film school and all that other stuff (or at least picked up an English major somewhere). Movies like "The Blind Side" are essentially the "Twilight" of film. They're bland, have tropes for characters, and are usually boring too. Granted, it was inspirational, but really only because it followed a formula. And when films fall back on formula too much, they start to be boring for those who are professional movie watchers.
Not saying your wrong, but 'The Blind Side' is a poor choice for your argument, given that it is based (and fairly closely, if you read the book) on a true story, so you can't really say that it is formulaic in that sense. Perhaps it uses a 'standard Hollywood format' in the presentation, or glossed over some deeper issues they could've addressed in order to keep the tone light and positive, but they certainly didn't rely 'on tropes for characters', since- you know- those are real people. And comparing it to Twilight... that's just wrong on so many levels. I think you broke my head.
OT: the issue I've had with Bob's reviews sometimes is that he'll focus on one aspect of the film that really pisses him off-- in this case, it was how "bad" movies like Expendables get supported while "good" movies like Scott Pilgrim do not; in the Book of Eli review, it was the whole 'Bible as McGuffin' thing-- and he ends up conveying very little in the way of useful information about the movie that we can use to make up our own minds. This is a bad way to "review" for two reasons:
1) it actually ceases to be a critique and should be more accurately labelled an editorial, and
2) it
forces the opinion of the 'reviewer' on the audience, rather than presenting evidence, providing an opinion based upon said evidence, and then elaborating, but still ultimately leaving the decision up to the audience.
Aside from that, I just thought that- in a way- it's ironic because Bob is yelling at people for being 'Sheeple' and eating whatever slop Hollywood shovels into the trough, but if he is honest about what he said in that review, his problem really is that
the sheeple are not dining on the slop that he thinks is of higher quality. There is such an arrogance in that stance.