The Big Eye said:
catalyst8 said:
'Muslim Should Not Equal Villain' is a laughable travesty of an assertion.
Anyone who condones rape, murder, & slavery (as any Christian, Muslim or Jew must do if they follow their 'holy' texts) is a despicable sociopath in dire need of incarceration.
I'm... not sure how you expect anyone to agree with that statement.
I think the point he's making is that most other religions have grown up with the times. By a literal interpetation of The Bible it can be argued that "thou shalt not suffer a witch to live" basically makes it a Christian duty to kill all non-Christians. It's important to note that in Christianity there are only two forces, god and the devil. God always identifies himself, so thus if your not following him, even if your worshipping a benevolent seeming deity or don't believe in Christianity, your actually a devil worshipper. The idea being that to "win" and get someone's soul, The Devil who is a great deceiver does not need to get people to murder babies or anything, simply to not follow God and accept Christ as their personal savior. Thus even if all of the benevolent new-age spin on Paganism was true back in the old days (it wasn't) it wouldn't matter since killing those people and preventing the spread of their faith (and thus dooming people who believed them) is part of your Christian duty. This is how a lot of the inquisitions and witch hunts were justified, a lot of people don't get the logic quite right in talking about it.
The thing is though that you don't see that practiced. The Pope doesn't put bounties on guys like Dan Brown for making criticisms of Christianity in his writing. On the other hand Muslim countries DO engage in this kind of thing, indeed there was a book called "Satanic Verses" that was critical of The Muslim world and the author and his publishers had a bounty put on their heads (by the Ayatollah himself no less). I am not kidding:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Satanic_Verses
Something people need to get through their heads is that we're not dealing with a lunatic fringe in "The Middle East". The entire Muslim culture is pretty far gone, just as bad as other religions like Christianity were centuries ago, but got over it. It *IS* possible to practice Islam without being a supporter of the entire xenocidal agenda, however the people who do so are not parts of the Muslim culture, and themselves represent the equivilent of a lunatic fringe.
In the US and other civilized western nations, we have a lot of left wing sentiment about how all people are the same, and have trouble as a society dealing with the idea that someone who is not fighting and just going about their lives within a certain belief structure and culture can be an enemy just as much as the guy firing an RPG. Largely because it's those guys who will respect the memory of a sucide bomber, or work to hamper pursuit and retaliation after an ambush (exploiting our morality where we will not fire on the "civilians" so if a crowd closes around a sniper, he can get away more easily). Our mentality being flawed by the way we have covered things like World War II, and tried to present the Nazis as some tiny fringe of people who oppressed all the paranoid, fearful, jew-hiding Germans, while somehow also having the manpower to conquer all these other nations with enough success where overconfidence lead to a losing multi-front war. We generally don't think of all the civilians killed in the "Volkssturm", the factories, farms and towns bombed out of existance and other related things.
The bottom line here is that the culture itself is based around theocracy and literal interpetation of the holy texts, with actual social policies in places around The Middle East where you have women being forced to marry their rapists, being stoned to death, and other things even when it doesn't come to their attacks against the rest of the world. Also incidently when they aren't trying to kill non-Muslims, they tend to try and kill each other over dogmatic differances, people underestimate the sheer intensity of a lot of Muslim on Muslim conflict, and how intense the whole Iran-Iraq thing has been without any outsiders involved.
Part of the problem is of course that we can't just leave them alone anymore, because with nations like Pakistan in possession of nuclear armament, and Iran developing it and threatening Isreal, even if we could isolate the area it wouldn't be a solution. Even if Isreal isn't nuked, it's only a matter of time before one Muslim faction goes nuclear on another without any other threat.
At any rate, this is long again, but the bottom line is that Muslims aren't being demonized by The West unfairly. The opposite actually, as we have a lot of people who are willing to defend them to a ridiculous extent and even lie in their defense as part of a "peace at any price" attitude (ie letting them get away with doing bad things is better than an all out war). The goverment hasn't instituted any kind of "War Powers" like was done during "World War II" to demonize the enemy and control infrmation. There is no goverment propaganda department trying to convince people that Muslims are bad. The fact that it took this long to start seeing negative portrayals of Muslims in some places (like games) despite the war is actually kind of disturbing. What's more for all the whining about the video game front, fairly recent shows like "Lie to Me" and others have had entire episodes dedicated to the whole "Muslims aren't evil" left wing schtick. What crying your seeing is simply because there is actually an anti-Muslim voice out there in the US that is becoming harder to silence after all this time, and it bothers some people.... and honestly after decades of conflict, a decapitation strike on the US goverment, and other assorted madness it's not like people don't have fair reasons for not liking the culture.
I mean honestly, an Ayatollah puts a death warrent out on an author and his publishers for writing a novel, the guy more or less running a united church and state, and causing the outcry of millions, and I'm not supposed to form any negative opinions about this? I'd be just as critical if we currently had Catholics putting death warrents out for Dan Brown, but it doesn't happen. Sure that paticular story had a happy ending (sort of) but it's one thing after another and continues on into today.
I refuse to walk on eggshells for fear of violence from an entire civilization of xenophobic religious fanatics. "Oh no, if we don't cater to these people, or watch our words they might blow us up or kill someone". Sorry, I don't want to share a planet with a time bomb like that. If it was just a radical fringe it wouldn't be such a big problem.