Psycho Cat Industries said:
You're not reading me are you?Risk by association.Honestly,what is so hard to understand that if you are associated and she is caught then this whole thing ends under law.Religion has nothing to do with what I state with marriage.Atheists get married don't they?Your statement has nothing to do with the problem.Really,we're arguing for nothing.Legality matters call for risk.I do no such damning,I am not the police.Why do you assume this?The comparison is not to smoking but to your saying that it is justified by the risk.That would therefore justify any and all acts of violence.Your quickness to judge truly shows this hatred that you wish to project on me and really,why does this matter?
I don't think you're reading me: I referred exactly to Athiests getting married i.e. hypocrisy. A foot in tradition for tradition's sake, no higher thought involved other than the fact that it has been highlighted as something that must be done to be considered a human being.
Akin, I'm sure you would agree if you could comprehend, to your statements surrounding weed: thought of badly because enough people have labelled as such.
I didn't assume you were the police, I'm assuming your stance on the rules as set out on a plate to you that you seem so eager to break out the cutlery for. I didn't say it is justified for the risk, I said it isn't necessarily wrong because it is illegal.
Do not drag things out of context, you have to remember that I am in a defense in this discussion - I am merely challenging your points but you wish to reflect your feelings on the topic onto my feelings for you.
I have no hatred, only concern. I apologise if my dulcet words have given that impression. You're right, it doesn't matter. But that talk is of a defeatist, attempting to disarm me for caring too much when other discussion eludes you.