Net Neutrality being overruled. please god tell me its a joke.

Recommended Videos
Jan 19, 2011
65
0
0
A post in on the fourms that isn't about feminism, nice guys, gender orientation or consent managed to get 150 posts in 7 hours?! It's 2010 again! It's a miracle! The Golden Age is back!

*Checks comments*
*It's a few people pointlessly arguing about something that is only tangentially related to the topic*

I should have seen it coming.

OT: Seems interesting, but given the population of the Escapist these days, I'll doubt we'll have a field day with it like last time.
 

Just Ebola

Literally Hitler
Jan 7, 2015
250
0
0
Smithnikov said:
Ebola_chan said:
I like the direction the country is moving in, you don't.
I doubt you will when you learn that you can once again be treated like a second class citizen by businesses and have no legal recourse.

You never answered my question, by the by; if they have the law on their side, exactly how are you going to "confront" them? What can you actually do?
Oi, did you miss the part where I said I was done with this thread? It's already been derailed past the point of recognition. PM me if you really want to pick my brain, but I'll answer this because everybody gets a freebie.

Like I already said, most homophobic/racist assholes are going to be homophobic/racist assholes regardless of what protections are or aren't in place. Maybe read through some of my other posts, you'll see that I've already given my opinion on most of these things.

Someone denies me service because of their puritanical hang-ups? Fine, it's as simple as me not seeking them out again, maybe throwing in an expletive as I walk out, if I'm feeling particularly vindictive. I'm not going to yell about how they'll be "hearing from my lawyer". Call me old-fashioned but I'm of the mindset that if you don't want anything to do with me, I don't want anything to do with you. What you need to realize is that people who deny business to people based on their prejudices will eventually cripple their own business model. In the sense that "Oh, I would've made an extra $3,000 this month if I wasn't such a homophobic ****." Meanwhile businesses that don't discriminate will get a boost in revenue from all the customers that get turned away from other small businesses and will either buy out or render obsolete the ones that do. There you go, the market is Darwinian and sorts itself out, no lawsuits needed.

Smithnikov said:
Ebola_chan said:
I abhor racism to, as well as homophobia (obviously).
So why do you want businesses to be able to engage in legally supported anti-gay bigotry (I HATE the word homophobia, it's quite inaccurate)?
Since you quoted me twice to say basically the same thing, I can direct you to the post you're currently reading for your answer. As far as 'homophobia' being inaccurate- I suppose it is. It refers to an irrational fear rather than an irrational hatred. But using the 2 interchangeably has become part of the common parlance, so I'll continue to use it. Words mean what the majority decides they do these days.
 

Saelune

Trump put kids in cages!
Legacy
Mar 8, 2011
8,411
16
23
@Ebola_chan: Yes, bigots will be bigots, but when the law punishes them for it, that is justice. But what then when the law sides with the bigots?
 

Just Ebola

Literally Hitler
Jan 7, 2015
250
0
0
Saelune said:
@Ebola_chan: Yes, bigots will be bigots, but when the law punishes them for it, that is justice. But what then when the law sides with the bigots?
Look, I explained the reasons behind my thinking, I don't know what else you want from me. We disagree, that's it, and you can't muster the ability to argue 1: civilly and 2: coherently.

I've already said my piece and tried to leave it at that, I even let you have the last word you were clamoring for, since I'm such a nice guy. So the real question here is why can't you let sleeping dogs lie?

If you are so desperate to hear my opinions, take it up with me by PM like Smithinikov. Otherwise we're done, I'm not contributing to the growing mess this thread has become any more.
 

Saelune

Trump put kids in cages!
Legacy
Mar 8, 2011
8,411
16
23
@Ebola_chan: I will keep responding as long as I have something to say. You are free to not respond.

Because we disagree is why I continue. I would much prefer we did agree. If we agreed, Id probably have nothing more to say.
 

Just Ebola

Literally Hitler
Jan 7, 2015
250
0
0
Saelune said:
@Ebola_chan: I will keep responding as long as I have something to say. You are free to not respond.

Because we disagree is why I continue. I would much prefer we did agree. If we agreed, Id probably have nothing more to say.
Well that isn't going to happen anytime soon, I think I'll always disagree with you. If you want to work yourself into a lather about it, no flesh off my bones. Do you have so little consideration for other denizens of this site who didn't come to this thread to see the shitshow it's turned into that you'd keep posting nothing, just for your own self-gratification?

I mean, I guess you've already answered but still. That's a symptom of the behavior I've been talking about this whole time.

If you want to waste time on a fruitless task, knock yourself out. I'm not drinking your kool-aide.
 

Saelune

Trump put kids in cages!
Legacy
Mar 8, 2011
8,411
16
23
@Ebola_chan: "Always disagree with you" is a rather tall order.

This is a public forum. People are free to read or not read our posts.

And so you are aware, you act like I am forcing you to respond. You choose to respond, and continue along with me. We are both guilty of this, not just me.

Edit: And its not like I am spamming you with inbox notices anyways.
 
Dec 10, 2012
867
0
0
This. This thread is why we are so, so much more fucked than many people realize.

Reason and facts don't make any impact anymore. We are so entrenched in our positions that a carpet bombing of information still isn't enough to dislodge us. You can confront a Trump supporter with facts, and he will say 'cite your sources.' You cite a source, he says that it's biased liberal media. You cite a conservative source, he says 'I don't have time to read all that.' Even if he does read it he says 'it doesn't literally mean what it says, it's a figure of speech.' There is no winning any more arguments, because no one is interested in whether they are right or wrong, it's all about embarrassing the opposing side. And with Breitbart and it's ilk running wild, anyone can find a story that supports anything they choose to believe springing from their personal biases, prejudices, or outright insanity.

The national debate is over. The good guys lost, the bad guys won, and we all just have to suck shit for 4 years and hope the actual state of things wakes people up by then.