Crono1973 said:
Fagotto said:
Crono1973 said:
Fagotto said:
Crono1973 said:
Fagotto said:
Crono1973 said:
Fagotto said:
Crono1973 said:
Fagotto said:
Crono1973 said:
Fagotto said:
Crono1973 said:
Fagotto said:
Crono1973 said:
Fagotto said:
Crono1973 said:
Sonicron said:
Oh, for fuck's sake. Years and years parents preach that teachers need to be an important part of children's upbringing, with values like honesty at the very center of the debate, and now they ***** about a teacher being honest and "demystifying" the fictional figurehead of a commercial (yes, commercial, deal with it) holiday?!
If there is any kind of justice in the world, the teacher will not only NOT get in trouble, but the school will also make a formal statement to the parents, politely telling them to go suck it. God. Damn. D:<
If an 8 year old kid asks the teacher to explain sex, should the teacher "be honest" and do it or should the teacher refuse to discuss the subject?
The latter is what should have happened here. Santa is like religion, You could claim religious beliefs are lies too because they lack proof but then you miss the point of religion.
Let's see... is sex considered inappropriate for kids of that age? How about... yes.
Is the truth about Santa inappropriate at any age? Let's see... no.
Ok then. If a kid asked the teacher "Is there a God". What would the teacher do? Would he "be honest" and say that there is no scientific proof of a God or would he refuse to discuss it?
Let's see... is the government allowed to have an official position on God? No.
Is the government allowed to have a position on Santa Claus? Yes
Do the parents actually believe in Santa Claus? No
Might the parents actually believe in God? Yes.
This is not hard.
1) I wasn't aware the government had a position on Santa. What is the governments position on Santa?
2) I never said God and Santa were identical just that the belief is similar and not to be discussed in schools.
1) Maybe if you stopped to think a bit you might realize obvious things about the first amendment and what teachers are allowed to say given that they're employed by the government. But that would require thinking instead of reactionary BS.
2) Yes, you said they're similar and not to be discussed on school based on nothing solid, except a stupid comparison of concepts that are quite different legally(due to the 1st Amendment) and culturally.
Oh I see.
Well, let's look at your line of reasoning. It is also not illegal (according to the 1st Amendment) to answer those sex questions either. So would you be ok with the teacher telling the class all about sex because being honest is more important than the desires of parents?
It's not about legal or illegal. Religion is not discussed in schools because it is outside the scope of school as is a belief or non belief in Santa.
It's outside of the scope for a reason that doesn't apply to Santa at all. Further the teachers do not just restrict themselves to what is inside the scope of the school. The reason they restrict themselves from certain things is not JUST because they're outside the scope of the school.
Like Santa, it's outside the scope of school. Santa is for parents to talk to their kids about. Legal, illegal, neither have any bearing on this topic.
Why are you repeating 'outside the scope of the school' junk when I already addressed it?
Surely you can agree that there are some things that should be left to parents to teach. Well, IMO this is one of those things. You don't want to tell your kid that Santa is real, fine but then wouldn't you be upset if the teacher told them the opposite?
How about no, this is not one of those things. It lacks enough importance to complain about.
It's apparently important enough for you to be here arguing about.
So you're resorting to pretending you lack the intelligence to make anything but childish and stupid replies? "Hur dur, look you're replying it's important!"
Wow, this post advanced the conversation.
If it's not important then why are you putting up such an argument?
If you're not playing stupid, why are you ignoring the blatant fact that not everything someone does with their time is that important? Why are you playing a stupid game of distraction by pretending it matters?
I don't argue about things that I don't think are important. I just figured most people are like that too. Do you just argue for the fun of it?
Do you distract from the point just for the fun of it?
You've officially lost this argument. Instead of addressing what I said, you attempt to insult me. We're done.
Lolwut? Let's see... you think you can just decide that? Well wow, I didn't realize I was talking to the King of the Internet. Or wait maybe I'm just talking to someone pathetic enough they think they can just declare victory when someone points out that they're distracting from the issue by asking irrelevant questions.
I mean, how stupid is it to get all whiny over the fact I didn't address your question,
when your question had jack shit to do with the argument? "Waaaah, you won't fall for my red herring fallacy, u so mean u lose"