Gemini used to describe me very well. I do not like the idea of being a taurus...oh wait, I don' believe in this stuff
New Zodiac Signs. Apparently people care about it.
- Thread starter Krion_Vark
- Start date
Recommended Videos
Well then good sir, carry on.silasbufu said:
(I wonder if this sense of smugness will spread throughout the sagittarii population because of this XD)
Ah too bad. Becuse you know what they say: It's better to be a crab than having crabs.. Or something like that.PrimoThePro said:
The hell! I used to be a nice wholesome Virgo and now I'm a damn fuzzy Leo?
Tell those Astrological Assholes to stop screwing around.
Tell those Astrological Assholes to stop screwing around.
Okay? This is kinda stupid if you ask me. I liked being an Aries and i still am one, not gonna be some gay ass pisces
No offence to any people born under the pisces starsign
I dont actually buy into this but its just sorta cool telling people im an Aries
No offence to any people born under the pisces starsign
I dont actually buy into this but its just sorta cool telling people im an Aries
This has been known for quite a long time. Lately it's just reached the eyes of the populace at large. I know I found it interesting that I am both Cancer and Leo with this new Zodiac. A water zodiac and a fire zodiac.
The only problem with this is that the zodiac that we use for astrology has never been about the position of the stars, but about solstices. For example, some constellations take much larger room in the sky than others, yet the zodiac traditionally had zodiac signs take up equal parts of the calendar, about a month. The zodiac brought up to light recently does indeed show that their position in the sky has changed, but it doesn't affect your horoscope if you originally followed the seasonal zodiac.
With the seasonal zodiac, the zodiac capricorn takes it's place on the calendar during the winter solstice, and Cancer during the summer solstice. That's why we have the tropics of Cancer and Capricorn. All the other zodiacs take place evenly between these two zodiacs. So in the model we traditionally use, new positions of stars have no affect on what your sign is.
Personally, I'd rather follow the astrological zodiac than the seasonal one. Seems to have more of an otherworldly feel to it.
The only problem with this is that the zodiac that we use for astrology has never been about the position of the stars, but about solstices. For example, some constellations take much larger room in the sky than others, yet the zodiac traditionally had zodiac signs take up equal parts of the calendar, about a month. The zodiac brought up to light recently does indeed show that their position in the sky has changed, but it doesn't affect your horoscope if you originally followed the seasonal zodiac.
With the seasonal zodiac, the zodiac capricorn takes it's place on the calendar during the winter solstice, and Cancer during the summer solstice. That's why we have the tropics of Cancer and Capricorn. All the other zodiacs take place evenly between these two zodiacs. So in the model we traditionally use, new positions of stars have no affect on what your sign is.
Personally, I'd rather follow the astrological zodiac than the seasonal one. Seems to have more of an otherworldly feel to it.
Great, I moved from "Libra" to "Virgo". That's......Great. I'd rather be the new one. It means "snake-bearer" in ancient Greek.
Uh uh. Yeah. Those guys are freakin' lucky.
Uh uh. Yeah. Those guys are freakin' lucky.
What the fuck is this shit? I'm a cancer now? That's never happened before. Should I be happy?
Whatever, astrology is stupid. At least I'm not associated with the weakest mobile suit EVER anymore.
Why couldn't I be a taurus or the new whatever the fuck it is. Everything is terrible.
Whatever, astrology is stupid. At least I'm not associated with the weakest mobile suit EVER anymore.
Why couldn't I be a taurus or the new whatever the fuck it is. Everything is terrible.
I don't believe, but the starsigns have always had an air of interesting character development aspects to them to the point of being eerily accurate to some people like me. Libra always worked in some strange, coincidental way.
In light of this all, I am not a Virgo. Besides, wouldn't this only count for those born after the switch?
In light of this all, I am not a Virgo. Besides, wouldn't this only count for those born after the switch?
So I have gone from a water poring dude, to a water poring goat fish? Surely they mean: "Capricorn Jan. 20 - Feb 15?"Krion_Vark said:
On topic: I really don't care that much, and since I really don't read or take much mind of horoscopes this in't going to effect me much.