Fox12 said:Cold Shiny said:It is a good argument though. A console that was marketed towards "everyone in existence" would be the perfect console, and the most perfect piece of technology ever actually. Companies have to choose who they want to appeal to, because they can't have everyone. Nintendo, obviously, is not marketing towards the tech savvy, power hungry, GRAFAX obsessed PC crowd. They just aren't. They are marketing towards Japan. The Switch was designed for Japan, as much as people here might hate that.Fox12 said:So the same audience as the WiiU? We've already seen how well that played out.inu-kun said:People who play Nintendo games and people who want to play a new Xenoblade game (where is X2?!).Fox12 said:Well, who is it being marketed too? People who like to pay more money for a less powerful console that has a smaller library of games? It's too expensive and low power to be a worthwhile home gaming console, and it's battery life is too short to be a worthwhile handheld. Not to mention how cumbersome it is. It has the weaknesses of both handhelds and consoles and the strengths of neither. So what's the point?
I'm struggling to see what demographic this is apparently being marketed to, other then the hard core Nintendo fans. I suspect that, as a result, it will fail to find an audience and fail. But only time can tell.
People can't just deflect valid criticism by saying the game "isn't marketed to you." That's a non-argument.
Then why is it so large and cumbersome compared to a 3DS, and why does it have a terrible battery life? Are Japanese businessmen really supposed to pull this out on a crowded train to work, and keep it on their person during the day? Saying "it's not marketed to you" fails to address any of the actual criticisms being made. Therefore it's a non-argument.
Yes...but what happens after Mario and Zelda? what then? one year later another Zelda and Mario? Nintendo can only flog a dead horse so many times.