stukov961 said:By covering up sexuality and not talking about it, teenagers only get more intrested in it and the whole thing gets overhyped.
And the idea that "teaching" violence somehow is better that teaching about birth control and how to protect yourself against STDs, is just outright stupid.
Beeing open about sexuality would together with sex ed help reduce STDs and teen pregnancy not the other way around!
Besides Nudity =/= Sex
Don't get me wrong. I've got nothing wrong with it myself. My friend's uncle works at Nintendo in Washington and this is what he told us when we asked.RaziTheRed said:TEENS shouldn't have access to M rated game featuring nudity or violence now should they?
I don't understand the point of a rating system if it isn't taken seriously.
With respect to your friend's uncle, I feel that Nintendo don't do games where nudity would fit, they don't really make games like Mass Effect and Fallout, do they?Death God said:stukov961 said:By covering up sexuality and not talking about it, teenagers only get more intrested in it and the whole thing gets overhyped.
And the idea that "teaching" violence somehow is better that teaching about birth control and how to protect yourself against STDs, is just outright stupid.
Beeing open about sexuality would together with sex ed help reduce STDs and teen pregnancy not the other way around!
Besides Nudity =/= SexDon't get me wrong. I've got nothing wrong with it myself. My friend's uncle works at Nintendo in Washington and this is what he told us when we asked.RaziTheRed said:TEENS shouldn't have access to M rated game featuring nudity or violence now should they?
I don't understand the point of a rating system if it isn't taken seriously.
Not really. Violence is more acceptable in pretty much ALL types of media, except books mainly because you don't actually see it firsthand and your imagination pretty much do the exagerration for you while nudity is absolute. (you know what nudity looks like) Sorry, going off topic. It's more of a morality issue. In movies and games, we see bloodshed all the time, some of which are movies thhat the whole family would gather around and enjoy. Games are looked down upon in society (Im pretty sure all of you know that) and the rating system (compared to movies) is more strict. But though we see games in which limbs are torn off and the recipient spews enough blood to fill a kiddy pool. Why is that? Like I said before, it's a morality issue. What's the issue? There isn't one, that's the issue.It's not really morality, but the fact that society is hardened beyond the usual bloodshed. We see it everywhere: games, movies, books, even real life. But the fact that a nipple is even seen in an interactive medium, the mere witness will make anyone not familiar with the medium or it's context cast Shtstrm2 on all their enemies (ie. us) I agree that the whole "Mass Effect Scandal" was a joke, but this trend will eventually pass if we see enough of it. I would just sit back, bite the bullet, and ignore my parents as they tell me that my games are melting my brain away.Broady Brio said:So why is violence considered better than nudity?
Because I guess you can do more with pictures and scenes with nude people.
So would I. I don't mind nudity at all but that is the reason he says that they avoid the subject.stukov961 said:With respect to your friend's uncle, I feel that Nintendo don't do games where nudity would fit, they don't really make games like Mass Effect and Fallout, do they?Death God said:stukov961 said:By covering up sexuality and not talking about it, teenagers only get more intrested in it and the whole thing gets overhyped.
And the idea that "teaching" violence somehow is better that teaching about birth control and how to protect yourself against STDs, is just outright stupid.
Beeing open about sexuality would together with sex ed help reduce STDs and teen pregnancy not the other way around!
Besides Nudity =/= SexDon't get me wrong. I've got nothing wrong with it myself. My friend's uncle works at Nintendo in Washington and this is what he told us when we asked.RaziTheRed said:TEENS shouldn't have access to M rated game featuring nudity or violence now should they?
I don't understand the point of a rating system if it isn't taken seriously.
So I feel that's a bit beside the point, and even if he was an employee on say Bioware, I would still disagree.
Oh yes, we live in a misogynistic society packed full of hypocrisy and double-standards.Yokai said:I was just thinking about this the other day, or rather how ridiculous it is in film (although the following observations pop up in video games too). I've noticed it's usually acceptable to show a naked man from behind in a PG-13 movie, such as The Da Vinci Code or Beowulf, but bare female ass immediately gets an R rating, e.g. Terminator 3 although there were probably other factors in that case. Likewise, in R-rated films, male full frontal nudity is accepted (if not frequent) but god forbid you should show a woman from the waist down for more than a second or two.
My conclusion is that not only does our society find nudity harmful and thinks it turns the children into evil little rapists, but that female naughty bits are more likely to cause this than their male equivalents. What the hell does this say about us? Really, what are the implications there?
(Also, if you'd like to disprove my theory, go right ahead. I admit I have not watched large numbers of films with naked people.)