That is exactly what I was thinking when I saw this.Sacman said:No crap, that's why it's called piracy [http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/piracy]...
In my opinion, this is just Obama's way of introducing the ACTA act before it gets signed.
That is exactly what I was thinking when I saw this.Sacman said:No crap, that's why it's called piracy [http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/piracy]...
Nice to see someone mention this. People like to point at the big bands out there and talk about how rich they all are, or point to the publishing companies and their giant yearly intake, and loudly proclaim that they have enough money and no one is getting hurt. As you pointed out, however, that's not really the case at all. The big bands don't feel the pain, and they more than make up for any losses with their giant tour and merch income. The heads of the publishing houses aren't going to be feeling it either, if revenue takes a dip they're likely the last ones to take a pay cut and if someone needs to be fired they're not going to fire themselves. It's the little guys that take even "small" losses on the nose. That indie band you were going to sign? Sorry, revenues are down for this year. Gotta cut payroll? That guy who works in the mastering department or the new guy on the art team that has a family to feed are a good place to start.BonsaiK said:I know this because I work in the industry and I've seen jobs lost and companies both big and small bankrupt or downsize drastically. I know plenty of teenagers who have massive music collections and haven't paid for any of it. Big, successful bands won't give a shit, they'll survive anyway (when you're as big as Radiohead you can afford to give away your new album for free), but it's the little artists that get shafted because they simply can't get a leg up, financially - their stuff appears on Russian MP3 sites sometimes before their CDs even hit the shelves...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USA_PATRIOT_ActDeshin said:Patriot Act,
Yeah, that was a horrible mistake. World War 2 was full of them on every side. We apologized though?Deshin said:Japanese-American Internment,
That's a treaty being worked on exclusively by the executive branch. To become law it has to be passed by a supermajority of the congress. Even if all the supposed blatant civil rights issues remain, they will be easily shown as unconstitutional.Deshin said:upcoming ACTA:
Don't deny that money isn't today's ultimate power.[/quote]Deshin said:upcoming ACTA:
er, why? technically, piracy is stealing and why shouldn't someone who is stealing something be dealt with (IN AN APPROPRIATE MANNER)AndyFromMonday said:I just lost respect for this administration.
Maybe you should read this treaty a little more carefully. Have you cleared your cache since viewing this thread? Then by the terms of Acta, you're guilty of theft. It isn't just applicable to music and videos. The way this is written, any intellectual property right saved to your computer, knowingly or not, is fair game. Corporate logos, trademarks, video game characters, just to name a few examples. My avatar is a picture of Mario. That is the intellectual property of Nintendo. Because you haven't cleared your cache, you have an unauthorized reproduction of Nintendo's property without Nintendo's written consent. According to ACTA, you've defrauded Nintendo and they may pursue you (or if you're underage, your parents or whoever pays your internet bill) for punitive and compensatory damages in court if they so choose. ACTA also allows for your internet service provider to scan your hard drive without your consent looking for copy right violations and notify the "defrauded" party.SODAssault said:You're really of the opinion that obtaining something for free, when it was only able to be created because somebody sunk a lot of money into it with the intent of having their investment refunded (at the very least) by sales... is in no way a form of theft?AndyFromMonday said:I just lost respect for this administration.
It cost somebody else a lot of money to create what you're pirating. If you obtain it without payment, and without their consent, you're taking money from them without their permission. That's a very basic form of stealing.
Copyright Infringement actually.AgentNein said:Cuz it's such a stretch to consider piracy theft? I mean, the only people who've fooled themselves into thinking otherwise are pirates and idiots.AndyFromMonday said:I just lost respect for this administration.
Is it different than physical theft? Absolutely. But it's still theft.
How, exactly? :SThe Procrastinated End said:I'd be fine with this if they actually charged the people with the actual price of the things pirated, but no that's not good enough, they have to ruin some teenage lives.
Some lady was charged $80.000 per song for an album-torrent she uploaded to some torrent tracker. I doubt she will ever get back on track and will probably have an easier life by turning full time criminal.Valkyrie101 said:How, exactly? :SThe Procrastinated End said:I'd be fine with this if they actually charged the people with the actual price of the things pirated, but no that's not good enough, they have to ruin some teenage lives.
Holy shit. That's just for uploading stuff, not downloading, though? And I thought ACTA hadn't passed yet?Hateren47 said:Some lady was charged $80.000 per song for an album-torrent she uploaded to some torrent tracker. I doubt she will ever get back on track and will probably have an easier life by turning full time criminal.Valkyrie101 said:How, exactly? :SThe Procrastinated End said:I'd be fine with this if they actually charged the people with the actual price of the things pirated, but no that's not good enough, they have to ruin some teenage lives.