There is someone I've noticed (not saying who) who seems to constantly describe themself in these sorts of threads in a positive light in regards to their attractiveness, before signing off with "but I'm asexual so it doesn't matter to me". Which leads me to scream "liar!" in my head. Its interesting, but there you go.Casual Shinji said:It does seem so, doesn't it?Woodsey said:Although if I'm honest I think asexuality is the "new bi" in that regard.
Most of the time I hear someone on this forum say they're asexual there seems to be this underlying tone of "I'm going against the current, baby! Yeah!!!"
Um... thanks?rokkolpo said:Oh wow, interesting.
That's quite an admirable trait you have there.
Maybe at the conscious (or subconscious) level that is true. But at a biological level, very few men would fit at the "3" on that scale. Then again, sexuality doesn't have to be completely about biology. What I will say is that I don't view hetero/homo sexuality as a choice. But when you actively fight your biological responses, I consider that a choice.OmniscientOstrich said:Hate to break it to you sweetie, but having a preference for one gender or the other doesn't mean someone's not bisexual:poppabaggins said:Studies show that most men who claim to be bisexual actually have a clear preference one way or another. So I'm calling bullshit on the number of guys claiming to be bi.
source: http://www.webmd.com/sex-relationships/news/20050830/study-bisexual-men-not-aroused-by-both-sexes
Women are a different story.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kinsey_scale
I'm actually interested: what experiments did you do in order to figure out your omnisexual? sounds like an... arduous process.Julianking93 said:I think it's a guarantee there's at least a few people lying about that >.<eggmiester said:omnisexual? kinky. but yeah, i, as a matter of fact , am not bisexual- i'm bi-curious! big difference. maybe alot of people who are bisexual are just bicurious- or whatever the equivalent is for gay lads. also: how many people on here are not straight? 10%? 20%? i only ask because on average, around 10% of people are either bicurious, bisexual or just plain 'ol gay. if it's reaching 20%- there may be liars among us!
As for being bicurious, yeah there are lots of people are and I think that's where the whole "bi" trend comes from. Uncertainty and in need of a label to identify yourself with. Needing placement I guess. You can refer back to the Kinsey scale for all of this though as I firmly agree with it. It's just as difficult finding a 100% straight person as it is a 100% gay person.
But then you have the people who really don't know what they want and are just experimenting which I think is something everyone should do. Can't knock it til you've tried it, after all![]()
I think it has to do with being an invisible minority. They are often mistaken for gay or straight IRL, so they are a little more sensitive to people understanding who they are. Just a theory of course.Chefodeath said:Just a little something I've noticed about the escapist is that you see a lot of people chiming in with the "I'm bi so this, this, and this ^.^"
The fact that I've always found this slightly annoying aside (Seriously, what the fuck does your sexual preference have to do with what kind of food you like?) Its always struck me as strange that we see more bisexuals proclaiming themselves than just straight up gay people doing it. It was my understanding that there are significantly more people identifying themselves as gay than as bisexual.
So, anyone have an explanation for this?
tl;dr: You see more bisexuals on the escapist than gays. Why?
Hehe, no nothing arduous.eggmiester said:I'm actually interested: what experiments did you do in order to figure out your omnisexual? sounds like an... arduous process.![]()
I can assure you I have the best intentions. (no sarcasm)Julianking93 said:Um... thanks?rokkolpo said:Oh wow, interesting.
That's quite an admirable trait you have there.
I'm not sure if that's sarcasm but thanks nonetheless.
It just basically means I like "people" without much preference to gender.
I get a lot of shit for it from people thinking that means I'm also a paedophile or into bestiality though >.>
Hehe, I kinda like the hippie ramblingrokkolpo said:[
I can assure you I have the best intentions. (no sarcasm)
If more people could just love instead of worrying about things like sex/race/gender life would be a lot easier.
But look at me rambling on like a hippy.
Sucks that you have to deal with people insulting you for it.
But yeah, they fear what they do not understand, don't let it get to you.
Ah, I remember reading that study. I call bullshit.poppabaggins said:Studies show that most men who claim to be bisexual actually have a clear preference one way or another. So I'm calling bullshit on the number of guys claiming to be bi.
source: http://www.webmd.com/sex-relationships/news/20050830/study-bisexual-men-not-aroused-by-both-sexes
Women are a different story.
And now it's 1.Comieman said:I am bi, and the amount of times I used that in arguments or explaining my preferences / tastes (not related to sex, herp derp), is equal to 0
Did not quite notice the sexual preferences of others here though
Perhaps your overthinking it a smidge, I don't think that people looking for a romantic relationship are really worried about their biology as you put it. Personally I don't know or care where exactly I would fit on the Kinsey scale as the statistics are irrelevant to the individual. Somebody could be a 1 on the scale but still find someone that they love with a person of the same sex and vice versa with someone who is a 5. Ultimately it's the person that they are attracted to not the gender.poppabaggins said:snip
I agree with you, which is what made it so frustrating when this fad showed up after I figured out I was a bisexual.DeadlyYellow said:Can't speak for everyone, but I feel somewhere along the lines Bisexualism devolved into a middle-school level of fad. It carries the ring of someone who is either a wagon-rider or just insecure about their sexuality.