That's not the point. They accepted the idea that this is all blown up to idiotic levels of panic, and then said that it's good even if politicians are fucking with our heads.
Anyway, I'm not the one to represent this, but I'll say this: Look into both sides of the coin. The IPCC may be giving us this proof, but there's no contradiction. To quote an old Arabic mathematician: "The seeker of truth does not put trust in any old consensus: he questions it, and submits his learning from it to reason & demonstration." Believe me, I was sold on the idea that we have to save ourselves from carbon doom, but I read more into it, and there is proof on the other side of the coin, but the media will never ever put these out. Yes, they can't put out things that are "lies", but they're denying scientists who've worked their asses off and found just as good proof as Al Gore or Michael Mann. Take Richard Lindzen or Anthony Watts as an example.
I will not debate this. You may reply, but I will not debate. I cannot tell you what is right or wrong, only what may be unclear. The rest is up to you to find out. If you're willing to look into this theory, I can provide sources and be glad to help, or, you can ignore my preaching. It's fully understandable, it sounds crazy from an outside perspective. We'll just wait and see who saved the world or who doomed it. Good day to you now.