Doug said:
Am I the only one who thinks Shakespear(*, **) plays are overhyped in this day and age? I mean, sure, in this day, everything was in context and made sense. But these days, half of the references make little to no sense, even if you decode the ole' English. I would have prefered to read Frankstein when I was in school, myself. Ok, MacBeth was good, but still not fun to read.
They make sense, but he's very overhyped. The Tempest? Frankly, I could write better in year three.
For English GCSE and A Levels, I've had to study extensively:
Romeo and Juliet
Pride and Prejudice
Saving Private Ryan (studying it sucks out the fun, I tell you)
Lord of the Flies (Egad, that book was SHIT)
A fuckton of poetry
Death of a Salesman and some other drivel by that git Arthur Miller
And some other shit I've probably forgotten.
*Shakespeare
**This one has bugged me for a while now. What the fuck is a 'Shakespeare Play?' You don't get a 'Tolkien Book' or a 'Shakespeare Poem' or 'Shakespeare Sonnet' (although you do get a '(Michael Bay's) Michael Bay Film (Directed by Michael Bay (MICHAEL BAY!!!!!!!!!!!!!11111oneone)). It's just a play, written by Shakespeare.